Vector Database Development Services

Vector Database Development

Semantic search, RAG pipelines, recommendation engines, and AI memory all depend on the same underlying infrastructure: a vector database that stores embeddings and retrieves similar content fast.
We design and build vector database systems for production AI applications, selecting the right store, building the embedding pipeline, and integrating retrieval into your AI workflows.

See our work
  • Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Chroma, and pgvector depending on your requirements

  • Embedding pipelines from your documents, products, and structured data

  • Hybrid search (semantic + keyword) for higher precision retrieval

  • Production-grade indexing, updates, and retrieval monitoring

Recent outcomes

RAG pipeline · Enterprise knowledge base

Built hybrid vector retrieval on Weaviate for a US legal firm's internal knowledge base. Reduced failed-search rate by 40% versus keyword search.

40% fewer failed searches

Conversational AI · Operational workflows

Embedded vector memory layer into a customer support chatbot. 70% of routine queries handled without human intervention after launch.

70% automation rate

Semantic search · E-commerce catalog

Deployed pgvector-powered product search for a UK retailer with 500K SKUs. Query latency under 80ms at production load.

80ms query latency
4.9 / 5 on ClutchSee all work

Recognition

Sound familiar?

  • RAG system returning irrelevant results that make your AI answer poorly?

  • Evaluating vector database options for your scale and budget requirements?

In short

RaftLabs builds vector database systems for RAG pipelines, semantic search, and AI memory in the US, UK, and Australia. We select the right store (Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector), build the embedding pipeline, and ship production retrieval in 12 weeks.

Trusted by

Vodafone
Nike
Microsoft
Cisco
T-Mobile
Aldi
Heineken
GE

AI development, by the numbers

AI products shipped in 24 months
20+
from kick-off to production-ready AI product
12 weeks
rated by clients on Clutch
4.9/5
years shipping software and AI products
9+

Retrieval quality is what makes RAG work

The language model is the visible part of a RAG system. The vector database is the foundation. If retrieval is poor, returning irrelevant documents, missing the most relevant content, or retrieving at too high a latency, the model cannot produce good answers no matter how capable it is.

Most RAG systems that produce poor outputs have a retrieval problem, not a model problem. We build the retrieval layer right.

Capabilities

What we build

RAG pipeline infrastructure

Complete retrieval infrastructure for RAG systems, the layer that determines whether your AI assistant returns accurate, grounded answers or plausibly-worded hallucinations. Document ingestion handles PDFs, Word documents, HTML, Confluence pages, SharePoint libraries, and database records; preprocessing removes boilerplate, headers, and noise that pollutes retrieval quality. Chunking strategy is chosen based on document structure: fixed-size windows (512-1024 tokens) for homogeneous text, paragraph-boundary chunking for structured reports, hierarchical chunking (chunk + parent document retrieval) for documents where individual chunks lack sufficient context. Embedding model selection balances accuracy and inference cost: text-embedding-3-large for high-accuracy domain-specific retrieval; text-embedding-3-small or all-MiniLM-L6-v2 for high-volume pipelines where cost matters. Vector store setup (Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, or pgvector) based on your operational preferences and scale. Hybrid retrieval combines dense vector search with sparse BM25 keyword search using Reciprocal Rank Fusion; a cross-encoder re-ranking pass improves top-K relevance before context is assembled. RAGAS evaluation framework measures Faithfulness, Answer Relevance, Context Precision, and Context Recall against a curated query set before launch and on a scheduled basis in production.

Semantic search

Search applications that understand meaning rather than matching keywords, so a user searching for "ways to reduce employee turnover" finds content about "retention strategies" and "staff engagement programmes" because they mean the same thing, not because they share lexical tokens. The failure mode of keyword search (exact-match hits on irrelevant content, zero results when the query uses different terminology than the document) is replaced by cosine similarity on dense embeddings that capture semantic proximity. For knowledge bases, help centres, internal document search, and product catalogues, semantic search reduces failed-search rates by 30-50% versus BM25-only search. Implementation uses bi-encoder models (sentence-transformers, OpenAI text-embedding-3-large) for candidate retrieval via approximate nearest neighbor search (HNSW indexing in Qdrant, Weaviate, or pgvector) and an optional cross-encoder reranking pass for top-K results where higher precision justifies the added latency. Metadata filtering applies structured attribute constraints alongside semantic similarity, searching a product catalogue by category + semantic query simultaneously. Search result explanations surface the passage that matched so users understand why a result was returned.

Recommendation engines

Product, content, and document recommendation systems using vector similarity, matching items to users based on semantic proximity rather than requiring exact keyword overlap or collaborative filtering's need for dense interaction matrices. Item-to-item similarity recommendations use embeddings of product descriptions, images (via CLIP), or behavioral sequences to find semantically similar items, handling cold-start for new catalog additions that have no interaction history. User preference modelling encodes a user's interaction history into a preference vector using weighted aggregation or a learned user encoder; the preference vector is queried against the item vector index for real-time personalized ranking. Two-tower neural network architectures separate user and item encoding for high-volume serving, the item index is pre-computed; only the user query vector needs to be computed at inference time, enabling sub-50ms recommendation latency for catalogs of millions of items. An A/B testing framework with holdout groups validates lift in click-through rate, conversion rate, or session depth against a non-personalized baseline before full rollout.

AI memory systems

Long-term memory architecture for AI assistants and agents that need continuity across sessions, the component that enables an AI to remember that a specific customer's integration issue was escalated to tier 2 last week, or that a user prefers concise responses and works in the healthcare domain. Memory items (key conversation turns, user preferences, resolved issues, established facts) are embedded and stored in a vector database; at the start of each new session, a similarity search against the current context retrieves the most relevant past memories rather than loading the entire history into context. Memory types handled separately: episodic memory (specific past interactions with timestamps), semantic memory (learned facts about users, accounts, or topics), and procedural memory (successful action sequences the agent has executed). Recency and relevance weighting controls whether a memory from 3 months ago gets retrieved when a newer but less relevant memory exists. For multi-user applications, strict isolation ensures that User A's memory is never retrievable in User B's session, a security requirement that cannot be an afterthought in production memory systems.

Multi-modal vector search

Vector indexing for images, audio, and mixed-modal content alongside text, enabling applications that need to search across content types in a unified semantic index rather than maintaining separate search systems per modality. CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) embeddings enable cross-modal retrieval: a text query for "red leather sofa in modern living room" returns visually matching product images from an e-commerce catalog, even when the product descriptions don't contain those exact words. Image-to-image similarity search handles content deduplication, visual product matching, and forensic content identification. ImageBind handles joint embedding across image, text, audio, depth, and IMU data for IoT and media applications that need unified search across sensor types. Multi-modal indexes store both the raw content metadata and the embedding in the vector store, enabling metadata filters (product category, color attribute, upload date) to apply alongside semantic similarity ranking. For high-volume image catalogs with 1M+ images, approximate nearest neighbor search maintains sub-100ms retrieval latency without exhaustive comparison.

Embedding pipeline engineering

Production-grade embedding infrastructure that keeps your vector index current as your data changes, the engineering component that most RAG prototypes skip and then struggle with in production when the source data evolves. Document preprocessing extracts clean text from PDFs (PyMuPDF, pdfplumber), Word documents (python-docx), HTML (BeautifulSoup with boilerplate removal), and Confluence/SharePoint via API; noise removal strips navigation elements, headers, footers, and formatting artifacts that dilute embedding quality. Batch embedding API calls handle rate limits with exponential backoff and queue-based throughput management, enabling processing of large document corpora without manual intervention. Incremental indexing detects content changes using hashing or timestamp comparison and only re-embeds and re-indexes documents that have changed. Deletion and update handling propagates document changes to the vector store immediately, including cascade deletion for chunked documents where all child chunks must be removed when the parent is deleted. Metadata schema design ensures that structured attributes (document type, author, department, creation date, access level) are stored alongside vectors for hybrid filtering at query time.

How we work

From scope to shipped

Every vector database project follows the same four phases. Scope is locked and price is fixed before development starts.

  1. Week 1
    01

    Discover and design

    We map your data sources, query patterns, expected volume, and retrieval accuracy requirements. You leave week 1 with a written scope document covering vector store selection, embedding model choice, chunking strategy, and a fixed-price quote. No development starts without your sign-off.

  2. Weeks 2-4
    02

    Build the embedding pipeline

    We build the document ingestion and preprocessing pipeline, configure the vector store, and set up the embedding model integration. Incremental indexing and metadata schema are designed here. The pipeline runs against your real data before the retrieval layer is built.

  3. Weeks 4-10
    03

    Implement retrieval and integrate

    Hybrid search, re-ranking, and metadata filtering are implemented and measured against an evaluation dataset using Recall@K and MRR metrics. The retrieval layer is integrated into your AI application. Bi-weekly demos show working software at a staging URL.

  4. Weeks 10+
    04

    Launch and monitor

    Production deployment with retrieval monitoring activated on launch day. Retrieval quality metrics are tracked in production. 8 weeks of post-launch support included in every project.

Why us

Why teams choose RaftLabs

  1. Senior engineers build what they scope

    The engineers who assess your retrieval problem also build the solution. No bait-and-switch, no offshore handoff after the contract is signed. The team you meet in week 1 ships in week 12.

  2. Fixed price before development starts

    We scope the work, calculate the cost, and lock it in writing before any development starts. A scope change is a change request: priced, agreed, or dropped. It never absorbs into the project and appears on the final invoice.

  3. 9 years and 100+ products shipped

    Clients include Vodafone, T-Mobile, Aldi, Nike, Cisco, and Lockheed Martin. Track record across AI, SaaS, mobile, automation, and enterprise platforms across healthcare, fintech, logistics, and hospitality.

  4. Compliance built in from the start

    GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2 — compliance requirements are scoped in week 1, not retrofitted before launch. We have shipped HIPAA-compliant AI systems for US healthcare clients and GDPR-compliant products for European markets.

Ready to scope your vector database project?

30 minutes. You walk away with a clear cost, timeline, and team. No commitment.

Frequently asked questions

A vector database stores high-dimensional vector representations (embeddings) of text, images, or other data, and retrieves the most similar vectors to a query vector at high speed. Language models represent meaning as vectors, similar concepts produce similar vectors. A vector database makes it possible to find semantically relevant content rather than just keyword-matching content. This is the foundation of RAG pipelines, semantic search, and AI memory.

Pinecone is fully managed and production-reliable but costs more at scale. Weaviate is open-source with native hybrid search and a broader data model. Qdrant delivers high performance with low resource usage, well suited for self-hosted deployments. pgvector keeps vector search inside PostgreSQL with no additional infrastructure, sufficient for most applications under 10M vectors. Chroma is best for prototyping. We recommend based on your scale, operational preference, and existing infrastructure.

Hybrid search combines semantic vector search with traditional keyword (BM25) search and merges the results. Semantic search excels at finding conceptually similar content even when the exact words differ. Keyword search excels at exact term matching, product codes, proper nouns, and technical identifiers. Hybrid search outperforms either alone for most real-world retrieval tasks. For RAG pipelines where retrieval quality directly affects answer quality, hybrid search is usually worth the additional complexity.

Small, fast models like text-embedding-3-small and all-MiniLM-L6-v2 offer lower cost and sufficient accuracy for most general-purpose retrieval tasks. Large, accurate models like text-embedding-3-large and BGE-large-en deliver better accuracy for domain-specific content at higher cost. Domain-specific fine-tuned embeddings significantly outperform general models on medical, legal, or technical vocabulary. We select the embedding model that balances accuracy requirements, inference cost, and query latency for your specific content and use case.

We measure retrieval using Recall@K (what fraction of relevant documents appear in the top K results), Precision@K (what fraction of the top K results are relevant), MRR (Mean Reciprocal Rank, where does the first relevant result appear), and NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain). We build an evaluation dataset from representative queries and expected relevant documents, then measure your retrieval system against this benchmark. Poor retrieval is the primary cause of poor RAG output and evaluating it explicitly is not optional.

Building a production vector database system with embedding pipeline, indexing, hybrid retrieval, and AI application integration typically runs $15,000 to $45,000 for a focused use case. More complex systems with custom re-ranking, multiple collections, multi-modal indexing, and evaluation frameworks run $40,000 to $90,000. Ongoing infrastructure costs depend on vector count and query volume. pgvector is the most cost-effective for self-hosted; Pinecone is the most operationally simple for managed.

Work with us

Tell us what you need. We'll tell you what it would take.

We scope Vector Database Development Services in 30 minutes. You walk away with a clear cost, timeline, and approach. No commitment required.

  • Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
  • Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
  • Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
  • 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
  • All conversations are NDA-protected.