Multi-platform food order management
RaftLabs co-built Gula to normalise orders from three delivery platforms and route them to restaurant POS and kitchen workflows. Results are specific to that product.
Restaurant Automation Software Development
Restaurant automation for one order-to-settlement workflow.
We automate a bounded restaurant workflow across channels, menus, orders, acknowledgements, kitchen handoff, fulfilment, inventory events, suppliers, labour data, payments, exceptions, and reconciliation. The operator, POS and delivery vendors, payment providers, accountants, food-safety leads, and advisers own menu, pricing, tax, allergens, staffing, purchasing, service, safety, and legal decisions.
Bring the problem, the current workflow, or the existing code. We reply with a practical next step within one business day.
Trusted by
The brief
Start with what is not working.
Good software decisions begin with the constraint, not a list of features or a preferred technology.
01
Do channel orders, POS tickets, kitchen state, stock movements, refunds, and daily totals disagree after a busy service?
02
Can managers see which integration, rule, person, or exception changed an order, ingredient, supplier request, shift, or settlement?
Plain answer
Restaurant automation connects order channels, POS events, kitchen handoff, fulfilment, inventory, suppliers, labour data, payments, and reconciliation. It should expose exceptions rather than automate judgement blindly. RaftLabs delivered Gula for multi-platform order consolidation and scopes one restaurant workflow first, with a written scope and fixed price agreed before development starts.
The order was accepted twice and cooked once.
A delivery platform retried its webhook, the integration created a second POS ticket, and the kitchen dismissed one as a duplicate. Settlement still counted both. The automation needed a shared event key, explicit acknowledgement, visible exceptions, and reconciliation from source order through kitchen and payment state.
Published restaurant delivery
- restaurants joined in month one
- 50+
- Gula multi-platform order case
- order errors reported after launch
- 0%
- Client-specific Gula result
- published delivery time
- 16 weeks
- Gula first platform release
These results belong to Gula, an Indonesian B2B product that consolidated GrabFood, GoFood, and ShopeeFood orders and handed them to existing POS and kitchen systems. They do not forecast another restaurant, geography, vendor stack, error rate, adoption, margin, labour, waste, safety, or revenue outcome.
Proof
Direct restaurant automation evidence
Direct restaurant ordering platform
Grubly demonstrates menu, QR ordering, payments, live order state, and kitchen-display delivery. It is adjacent to operations automation, not proof for every integration.
Bella Skin Institute runs a fully automated loyalty program with no vendor lock-in
We built a gamified mobile loyalty platform for a medical spa, enabling patients to earn points with built-in urgency mechanics and redeem rewards, supporting a business model where patient lifetime value depends on returning every 3-6 months for cosmetic treatments.
Automate a restaurant workflow when its events, exceptions, owners, and baseline are observable.
Configure a supported platform when it already connects the workflow and carries the update and service burden.
A fit
A high-frequency order, kitchen, inventory, supplier, labour-data, payment, or reporting workflow crosses systems and creates measurable manual work.
Operations, kitchen, finance, food-safety, IT, privacy, security, accessibility, support, and product owners can approve release.
Exact vendor access plus representative peaks, duplicates, delays, refunds, outages, corrections, and reconciliation cases are available.
Not a fit
A supported POS, restaurant platform, integration marketplace, or simple configuration already covers the workflow reliably.
The process lacks a stable owner or baseline, or depends mainly on nuanced service, staffing, purchasing, or food-safety judgement.
The operator expects automation to guarantee sales, margin, labour savings, food safety, order accuracy, or vendor compatibility.
Choose the service by the workflow it owns
| Need | Best fit | Primary boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Customer discovery, menu, ordering, loyalty, and delivery experience | Restaurant app development | Customer-facing product and channel |
| Orders, tenders, and outlet record | Restaurant POS | Authoritative transaction and supported hardware |
| Cross-system restaurant operations | Restaurant automation | Events, rules, exceptions, writes, monitoring, and reconciliation |
| Hotel outlet charge to guest stay | Hotel F&B integration | Guest verification, PMS folio posting, reversal, and night audit |
Scope
What belongs in one restaurant automation
Event and record contract
Define source, location, channel, order or operational identifier, version, timestamp, state, owner, permissible transitions, deduplication key, acknowledgement, correction, retention, and authoritative system.
Order and kitchen handoff
Normalise supported channel events, validate menu and modifier mappings, create an idempotent POS or kitchen handoff, record acknowledgement, route rejects, preserve changes and voids, and expose delayed or partial state.
Inventory and supplier workflow
Turn approved sale, recipe, count, waste, receipt, transfer, or threshold events into visible stock and purchasing tasks. Managers approve substitutions, quantities, suppliers, food-safety decisions, and purchase commitments.
Labour, payments, and reporting handoff
Move approved schedule, clock, payroll, tender, refund, settlement, or journal data between systems with clear authority, privacy, permissions, retry, audit, exception handling, and reconciliation.
Monitoring and operational control
Track freshness, queue age, duplicates, rejects, vendor errors, rate limits, failed writes, notification delivery, reconciliation gaps, and site health. Provide authorised pause, replay, correction, recovery, and manual fallback.
How it works
From operational baseline to one reconciled restaurant workflow
- Phase 101
Define event, owner, and baseline
Choose one workflow, sites, channels, systems, records, rules, exceptions, approvals, food-safety and finance boundaries, owners, current effort and error baseline, risks, and acceptance measures.
- Phase 202
Prove integrations and failure paths
Test exact vendors, versions, API access, sample events, identifiers, menu and order states, duplicates, delays, rate limits, outages, permissions, settlement data, exports, and manual fallback.
- Phase 303
Build the bounded automation
Set up event capture, normalisation, approved rules, acknowledgements, queues, human review, writes, retries, role access, audit, one or two integrations, monitoring, recovery, and reconciliation.
- Phase 404
Pilot through live service and hand over
Run normal and adverse scenarios through representative service periods, compare the baseline, reconcile records and money, test permissions, downtime, support, training, monitoring, and staged rollout.
Risk
What the automation contract must settle
- Vendor capability
- Confirm exact product, version, market, licence, API or export, events, writes, sandbox, rate limits, certification, support, and commercial terms. A named integration is not a guarantee.
- Food and service judgement
- The operator owns menu accuracy, allergens, stock suitability, purchasing, substitutions, staffing, food safety, customer service, alcohol policy, accessibility, and incident response.
- Duplicate and delayed events
- Use stable keys and state transitions, tolerate retries and reordering, show data age, quarantine ambiguity, support authorised replay, and reconcile source and destination.
- Money and records
- Define authority for orders, tenders, refunds, settlements, invoices, payroll, inventory and accounting. Restrict consequential writes, preserve history, and make every mismatch visible.
Related services
- 01
Restaurant App Development
Build customer-facing discovery, menu, ordering, loyalty, and delivery experiences.
- 02
Workflow Automation
Automate governed cross-system work beyond restaurant operations.
- 03
Invoice Processing Automation
Extract, validate, match, approve, post, and reconcile supplier invoices.
- 04
API Development
Create reliable event and data contracts between operational systems.
Work with us
Bring the workflow, systems, baseline, and exceptions that consume the most manager time.
Share sites, channels, POS, kitchen, inventory, supplier, labour, payment, accounting, events, manual touches, errors, owners, access, and service constraints.
- Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
- Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
- Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
- 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
- All conversations are NDA-protected.
Common questions
Good candidates have structured triggers, records, owners, outcomes, and frequent repetition: channel-order intake, POS or kitchen handoff, menu availability updates, stock events, supplier requests, invoice matching, approved labour-data handoff, daily reporting, and reconciliation. Food-safety, staffing, purchasing, pricing, and service judgement remain with accountable people.
Usually not. We first test the exact product, version, market, account tier, API or export access, authentication, events, writes, rate limits, certification, and vendor support. If a reliable path exists, automation can sit between systems. A named platform or past integration never guarantees compatibility with another account.
Agree a baseline before building: manual touches, handling time, duplicate or missing events, queue age, reconciliation effort, correction rate, and operational delay. Compare the same defined workflow after a controlled pilot. Revenue, margin, food waste, labour, customer satisfaction, and safety depend on wider operations and are not guaranteed.
Use idempotent events, explicit state transitions, validation, confidence or rule reason, bounded permissions, human approval for consequential changes, retry and dead-letter handling, visible exceptions, audit, reconciliation, monitoring, alerts, rollback, and a tested manual path. Start with one workflow before expanding.
Software first. Software automation, such as order routing, kitchen handoff, and inventory triggers, costs less than hardware, deploys faster, and tells you which workflows are actually worth robotizing. Automate the events before you automate the arms.
Partially, and the honest version matters. The workflows that automate well are the repetitive, rules-based ones: order handoff, ticket routing, stock triggers, schedule-to-payroll data. The work that stays human is judgment: substitutions, food-safety calls, guest recovery. Automate the repeatable; staff the judgmental.
The only honest test is forecast accuracy against real sales, not the architecture diagram. Demand a baseline of your current speed of service and forecast error, then the automation's numbers against it. TCO is subscription plus transaction fees plus hardware plus setup plus integrations plus additional services: measure the return against all of it, not the subscription alone.
Ask for a live demo of your exact workflows: booking to reservation, online order to kitchen, not a feature list. Ask which POS systems it integrates with and how: integration mechanics, not marketing. Check the exception path: what happens when an order is accepted twice and cooked once? Ask about support availability, onboarding, training, and escalation before signing. And run the baseline test: if the vendor cannot measure your current state, they cannot prove improvement.
A first release covers one operational workflow, one location or bounded group, approved rules, exception handling, one or two proven integrations, monitoring, reconciliation, and handover. Multi-site data, several POS or delivery vendors, forecasting, hardware, payments, or broad process change increase scope.