
AI OCR Software Scales Gas Station Operations With 20K+ Transactions
- 20K+
- 70%
- 40+
Security teams are piecing together visibility from a dozen vendor tools that don't talk to each other, writing detection rules in SIEM platforms that weren't designed for their specific threat model, and managing access reviews in spreadsheets with no enforcement mechanism. The security infrastructure is there. The operational tooling isn't.
Security operations tooling, threat detection, alert triage, and incident response dashboards
Identity and access management, user provisioning, access reviews, and privilege management
Vulnerability management, asset scanning integration, risk-based prioritisation, and remediation tracking
Security compliance automation for SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, and custom control frameworks
Recognition
Security team spending 60% of analyst time triaging false positives from tools that weren't tuned to your environment, instead of investigating the threats that actually matter?
Access reviews done quarterly in a spreadsheet because there's no system that pulls current access data, routes review tasks to managers, and enforces revocations automatically?
In short
RaftLabs builds custom cybersecurity software for security teams and delivers most projects in 10 to 16 weeks at a fixed cost. Products include SOC dashboards and threat detection tooling, identity and access management systems, vulnerability management platforms, and security compliance automation for SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, and custom control frameworks. RaftLabs is a software development company, not a penetration testing firm or managed security service provider. We build the operational tools your security team uses every day: platforms that aggregate alerts, route access reviews, track remediation tasks, and generate audit evidence.
Companies we've built for


Security teams have more vendor products than ever. SIEM, EDR, CSPM, vulnerability scanners, identity providers. Yet less operational clarity than they should have. Each tool generates its own alerts, applies its own severity scores, and lives behind its own console. Analysts context-switch constantly. Risk doesn't get aggregated. Decisions get made on incomplete data.
We build the software layer that sits on top of those tools: dashboards that unify alert data, workflow systems that route tasks to the right people, platforms that track remediation against SLA targets, and compliance tooling that collects evidence automatically. Not replacements for your security vendors. The operational software that makes your security vendors actually usable.
Alert fatigue from a SIEM firing hundreds of alerts a day, most of them noise your team can't afford to chase
When the majority of alerts are false positives, analysts spend their shift on triage rather than investigation. Real threats get missed. The signal-to-noise ratio is too low and the cost is a slower response to the incidents that actually matter. According to IBM's Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024, organizations take an average of 194 days to identify a data breach and a further 64 days to contain it, a total of 258 days. Custom SOC tooling with environment-specific prioritisation logic, deduplication, and routing rules cuts the analyst alert queue down to the investigations worth acting on.
Quarterly access reviews done in a spreadsheet with no enforcement mechanism for the revocations that come out of them
When the access review process runs on a spreadsheet populated from system exports and emailed to managers for sign-off, the review is slow and incomplete. Revocations rarely get actioned consistently. A year later, former employees still have active accounts. An access certification workflow that pulls current access data, routes reviews automatically, tracks completions, and enforces revocations replaces the spreadsheet with an auditable process.
Vulnerability remediation tracked in a shared spreadsheet with no SLA enforcement and no clear owner per finding
When critical vulnerabilities sit in a shared spreadsheet for weeks because nothing assigns them to the right team with a deadline attached, the CISO can't report remediation status accurately. Auditors find the same vulnerabilities open at successive reviews. A vulnerability management platform that routes findings to the correct team, attaches SLA targets, and reports fix rates by severity and owner turns remediation from informal to trackable.
Compliance evidence assembled manually by the security team in the weeks before each audit cycle
When SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit preparation means a security engineer spending three weeks pulling logs, exporting configuration states, and formatting evidence packages by hand, the compliance programme is expensive to run and the evidence is always retrospective. Automated evidence collection that pulls from cloud infrastructure, SaaS tools, and identity systems continuously produces an always-current audit library. Prep time drops from weeks to hours.
Custom SOC platforms that aggregate alerts from your SIEM, EDR, and cloud security tools into a single analyst interface. Alert triage workflows apply your specific severity logic and routing rules. Incident response case management handles evidence collection, timeline tracking, and closure documentation. SOC manager dashboards show analyst workload, mean time to respond, and detection coverage by threat category. Built around how your security operations team actually works, not a generic ticketing system handed to security and asked to adapt.
Custom IAM platforms for user provisioning and deprovisioning, role-based access control management, and access review workflows. Joiner-mover-leaver automation triggers access changes from your HR system when employees join, change roles, or leave. Privileged access management covers admin accounts with session recording and just-in-time access controls. Access certification workflows route reviews to the right managers, track responses, and enforce revocations. The audit trail shows compliance auditors that access is actively managed, not assumed.
Custom vulnerability management platforms that aggregate scan results from Tenable, Qualys, or Rapid7, apply risk-based prioritisation against your asset criticality and business context, and route remediation tasks to infrastructure, development, and application teams with SLA targets attached. Fix rate tracking and SLA compliance reporting gives your CISO a defensible answer when auditors ask how quickly critical vulnerabilities get remediated. Replaces the Excel-based vulnerability tracking process most security teams still rely on.
Custom compliance platforms for SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and custom control frameworks. Automated evidence collection pulls access logs, configuration states, and policy acknowledgments from your cloud infrastructure and SaaS tools without manual export. Continuous control monitoring alerts you when controls drift from their required state. Policy management tracks employee acknowledgments. Audit evidence libraries organised by control reduce compliance prep from weeks to hours. Built for your specific framework, not a generic GRC tool.
Custom threat intelligence platforms that ingest feeds from commercial, open source, and proprietary sources, normalise indicators of compromise into your detection environment, and surface relevant threat context to analysts during incident investigation. Threat actor tracking, TTP mapping to MITRE ATT&CK, and automated indicator enrichment in your alert triage workflow. The operational layer that turns raw threat intelligence into analyst-facing context at the moment it matters: during an investigation, not in a weekly report nobody has time to read.
Custom security analytics dashboards for CISOs, security managers, and board-level reporting. Security posture metrics tracked over time: mean time to detect, mean time to respond, vulnerability backlog by severity and team, control compliance rates, and user access risk scores. Trend analysis shows whether your security programme is improving or stagnating. Reporting pipelines pull data from your security tools automatically and produce consistent metrics on a defined schedule. No analyst manually assembling a report from six different systems every quarter.
We map the security tooling environment: the alert sources and volumes, the access management landscape, and the compliance framework obligations. We identify where the operational gaps are, what the current tools can't surface, what the team does manually, and agree a fixed-price scope before development begins.
We design the data model around your specific security environment: the alert taxonomy and routing logic, the identity data schema for access reviews, the control mapping for your compliance framework, and the integration points with existing vendor tools. Security architecture requirements including audit logging, role-based access, and encryption are designed in from the start.
Two-week sprints with working software at each checkpoint. The highest-priority use case, whether that's alert aggregation, access certification, or compliance evidence collection, ships first. Integrations with additional security tools and reporting layers follow in subsequent sprints.
Phased rollout starting with a subset of use cases before full deployment. Monitoring covers data pipeline health and alert processing latency. Post-launch support covers new tool integrations, detection rule updates, and compliance framework changes as the security programme evolves.
No. We're a software development company. We build the security software tools that security teams use: dashboards, platforms, workflows, and automation. We don't perform penetration testing, red team exercises, vulnerability assessments, or managed detection and response. We're not an MSSP. If you need a pen test or managed security services, a dedicated security firm is the right partner. If you need custom software to make your security operations more effective, a SOC platform, an IAM system, a vulnerability management tool, that's what we build.
Off-the-shelf security platforms are built for the median use case. Custom tooling makes sense when you need to integrate multiple vendor products into a unified operational view your analysts can actually work from. It also makes sense when your threat model or data sources are specific enough that standard platforms don't handle them well, or when you need to build security tooling into your own product rather than buying a standalone tool. Custom also makes sense when the ongoing licensing cost of a vendor platform exceeds what a purpose-built tool would cost to build and run. We assess that trade-off honestly during scoping.
We follow a secure SDLC: threat modelling during architecture, input validation and output encoding throughout, authentication using industry-standard protocols (OAuth 2.0, OIDC, SAML), encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access control designed to minimum necessary access, and full audit logging of security-relevant events. We document the security decisions made during development so your security team can review the architecture and your compliance team can reference it in assessments. Secure software is a baseline requirement, not an optional feature.
A focused security tool, single use case with one or two integrations, for example a threat detection dashboard or an access review workflow, typically runs $25,000 to $70,000. A full security platform with multiple data sources, compliance automation, access management, and analytics runs $70,000 to $200,000 depending on scope and integration complexity. We scope each project before pricing it. You get a fixed cost before development starts, not a time-and-materials bill that grows as requirements become clear.
Access certification workflows include escalation logic for non-responses. When a manager hasn't completed their assigned review tasks within a configurable threshold, typically 5 to 7 business days, the system sends a reminder. If the review is still incomplete after a second threshold, it escalates to the manager's own manager or a designated security team member. Non-response doesn't mean the access is automatically approved. You configure the default behaviour, which for most organisations means flagging uncertified access for security team review rather than treating silence as approval. The full audit trail shows every review request, every response, every escalation, and every revocation action: the evidence auditors need to confirm the process was enforced.
Security operations software
SOC dashboards, alert triage workflows, and incident response case management
Identity and access management software
User provisioning, access reviews, and privileged access management
Vulnerability management software
Scanner integration, risk-based prioritisation, and remediation tracking
Security compliance software
Automated evidence collection, control monitoring, and audit-ready compliance platforms
What clients say
Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

All of the sprints were completed on schedule and on budget. We highly recommend RaftLabs!
01 / 02
Tell us what your security team is trying to do and what the current tooling isn't giving them. We'll design the software and give you a fixed cost.