Loyalty platform migrated to a new stack for an energy provider
- 300,000+
- user records migrated to a new stack
Cloud Database Migration Services
Databases carry years of operational data. A migration that loses records, corrupts data, or takes your application offline for half a day is not an acceptable risk. Most database migrations fail not because the technical approach is wrong, but because the validation is insufficient and the cutover plan is made up on the day.
We migrate databases to managed cloud services, PostgreSQL to RDS, MySQL to Aurora, MSSQL to Azure SQL, Oracle to PostgreSQL, and NoSQL migrations, using replication-based strategies that keep downtime measured in minutes. Every migration includes schema validation, data integrity verification, and a documented cutover runbook tested in staging before the production window.
Schema conversion and data validation completed before any production cutover is attempted
Replication-based cutover strategy for relational databases, measured in minutes of downtime, not hours
Automated post-migration data validation comparing row counts, checksums, and data samples at the record level
Post-migration database tuning so query performance on the managed service matches or exceeds the on-premises instance
Recent outcomes
Voice AI · Research
6× deeper insights
Text-based interviews converted to automated phone calls
AI Automation · Ops
20k+ txns day one
Manual invoice OCR across 40+ gas stations
Loyalty · Retail
1,062 users in 4 weeks
SuperValu & Centra loyalty platform with receipt validation
SaaS · Logistics
2,000+ shipments yr 1
Multi-carrier shipping hub for Indonesian eCommerce
The problem
Database migration planned as a weekend maintenance window hoping it completes before Monday morning, with no validated rollback path if it does not?
Migrating between database engines (Oracle to PostgreSQL, MSSQL to Aurora) and the schema differences are larger than the initial assessment suggested?
Short answer
RaftLabs migrates databases to managed cloud services, PostgreSQL to RDS, MySQL to Aurora, MSSQL to Azure SQL, and Oracle to PostgreSQL. Every migration uses CDC replication for near-zero downtime cutover, with automated row-count and checksum validation before production goes live. Like-for-like single database migrations cost $15,000 to $30,000; cross-engine migrations requiring schema conversion run $40,000 to $80,000 at fixed price.
Key takeaways
Trusted by


A database migration is not a copy operation. It moves the operational record the business runs on: customer data, transaction history, and configuration state. That has to happen without losing a single record and without taking the dependent application offline longer than the business can accept.
The risk in database migration is not the technical approach. The risk is the gap between what was tested in staging and what exists in production: data quality issues that only appear at scale, stored procedures that behave differently under replication load, application queries that assume engine-specific behaviour that the destination does not have. The migration plan that accounts for this starts with a complete inventory and ends with automated validation at the record level.
According to Gartner's report "Data Migration: Put Your Data First or Your Migration Will Come Last," 83% of data migration projects either fail outright or exceed their budgets and timelines (Gartner). The consistent root cause is insufficient validation: teams discover data quality issues and schema incompatibilities in the production cutover window, when there is no time to fix them safely.
Capabilities
Migration of PostgreSQL and MySQL databases from on-premises servers to managed cloud services. Replication-based migration for near-zero downtime cutover, with automated data validation comparing row counts, checksums, and representative samples before cutover is executed. Post-migration parameter tuning for query performance, read replicas for read-heavy workloads, and automated backup and point-in-time recovery from day one.
Full Oracle to PostgreSQL migration including schema conversion, stored procedure rewriting, and data migration with validation. Automated assessment identifies incompatible objects and the manual work required to resolve them, stored procedures and Oracle-specific data types are converted and tested, and application SQL is reviewed for engine-specific syntax. Functional testing of the converted application before production cutover. The migration that removes the Oracle licence cost without leaving schema compatibility debt behind.
SQL Server migration to Azure SQL Database or Managed Instance. A compatibility assessment identifies features that need resolving before migration: linked servers, SQL Agent jobs, CLR objects, and cross-database queries. Managed Instance covers near-complete SQL Server compatibility where Azure SQL Database is too restrictive, and continuous replication during the window keeps downtime minimal. Elastic pools optimise cost across multiple databases.
Schema conversion for cross-engine migrations: incompatible data types, constraints, indexes, and procedural objects identified and resolved before data migration starts. Each object is categorised as auto-converted, converted with modifications, or requiring manual rewrite. Transformation scripts are built and tested against a full copy of production data in staging, then validated with per-table row-count checksums and sample comparisons before the cutover window opens.
Cutover planning and execution for migrations where extended downtime is not acceptable. The source database replicates continuously to the destination until lag is under a second, then the application switches over in a window of seconds to low minutes. Every production cutover follows a documented runbook, rehearsed in staging, with defined validation checks and rollback steps, and row counts and checksums on the highest-volume tables must pass before the source is decommissioned.
Database performance tuning after migration to ensure the managed cloud service matches or exceeds the on-premises baseline. Query performance analysis identifies regressions introduced by the move, indexes and parameter groups are tuned for the specific workload (transaction-heavy OLTP versus read-heavy reporting), connection pooling is set up for high connection counts, and vacuum tuning is applied for PostgreSQL. The database that performs as well after migration as the application team expects.
We do not run a production cutover blind. The first shippable step is a pilot migration into a staging copy of the target: a full rehearsal against a production-sized dataset that surfaces the real conversion errors, timings, and reconciliation gaps before a production window is ever scheduled. Only once the rehearsal passes do we set a date.
The two cutover strategies below cover most migrations. The choice is decided by database size and how much downtime the business can absorb, not by preference.
| Dump and restore (big-bang) | CDC replication (trickle) | Insight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Downtime | Hours: the full export, transfer, and restore run inside one window | Seconds to low minutes: only the final replication lag is applied at cutover | Replication wins when the business cannot lose an evening |
| Best fit | Smaller databases with a predictable restore time and an acceptable maintenance window | Production databases where extended downtime is not an option | Size and tolerance decide the method |
| Setup cost | Lower: one export and one restore, scripted and rehearsed | Higher: replication tooling, lag monitoring, and a rehearsed cutover runbook | You pay in setup to buy back downtime |
| Rollback | Restore the source from backup and repoint the application | Source stays read-only and current for a defined rollback window | Replication keeps a live fallback longer |
| Data drift risk | None during the window: the source is frozen | Managed by continuous sync; a final reconciliation pass closes the gap | Both are safe when validation gates the switch |
Under the hood the sequence is the same each time. A bulk backfill copies the existing data, CDC replays each insert, update, and delete made since the backfill started, a reconciliation pass compares row counts and checksums table by table, and only then do writes switch over. For the highest-risk tables we can run a dual-write phase so both databases receive writes while the destination is verified, with the source held read-only as the rollback path.
Tell us the engine, size, and acceptable downtime window. We will design the migration approach and give you a fixed cost before work starts.
Cloud Migration, full cloud migration capability overview
AWS Migration, migrating your full application stack to AWS, including databases
Azure Migration, migrating SQL Server and Windows workloads to Azure
Microservices Migration, decomposing monolithic applications alongside database migration
What clients say
Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

All of the sprints were completed on schedule and on budget. We highly recommend RaftLabs!
Stay on topic

Article
AI coding tools build MVPs, not businesses
Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, and v0 can build a working demo in an afternoon. But a demo is not a product. Here is what they skip and why it costs 3x more to fix later.
Read more
Article
Cloud Migration Strategy: The Business Leader's Guide
Most cloud migrations fail not because of technology but because of strategy. Here's how to build a cloud migration plan that delivers real business outcomes - not just infrastructure changes.
Read more
Article
Microservices vs Monolith: When Should You Actually Migrate?
Microservices is the right architecture for some businesses and a costly over-engineering mistake for others. Here's a decision framework for CTOs who need to decide - not just learn.
Read moreThe approach that avoids extended downtime is replication-based migration rather than dump-and-restore. We set up ongoing replication from the source database to the destination, using AWS DMS, Azure Database Migration Service, or native database replication depending on the source and target engines. The destination database receives a continuous stream of changes from the source as replication runs. When the replication lag drops to seconds, we execute the cutover: write traffic switches from source to destination, replication stops, and the source becomes read-only for a rollback window. The cutover itself, the window where writes are unavailable, is measured in seconds to low minutes, not hours. This approach is only possible when the migration has been running in replication mode for long enough that the destination is fully caught up. Dump-and-restore is appropriate for smaller databases where a maintenance window is acceptable and the restore time is predictable.
Change Data Capture (CDC) replication captures every insert, update, and delete from the source database's transaction log and replays those changes on the destination database in near real time. For a migration, this means the destination is kept continuously in sync with the source as replication runs, days or weeks before the cutover window. When the cutover window arrives, the replication lag is typically under a second. The application is pointed at the destination, the source is set to read-only, and any remaining replication lag is applied. The downtime window is the time between making the source read-only and the destination being fully caught up, usually seconds. AWS DMS supports CDC for most common database engines. Native database replication (PostgreSQL logical replication, MySQL binlog replication) is used where DMS introduces limitations. CDC replication is the standard approach for production database migrations where extended downtime is not acceptable.
Cross-engine migrations (Oracle to PostgreSQL, MSSQL to Aurora PostgreSQL) involve schema conversion, not just data movement. Oracle and MSSQL have proprietary data types, functions, and procedural language features that do not have direct PostgreSQL equivalents. AWS Schema Conversion Tool (SCT) or similar automated tools identify incompatibilities and produce a conversion report with the items that require manual resolution. Common issues: Oracle NUMBER types mapped incorrectly to PostgreSQL NUMERIC, Oracle stored procedures using PL/SQL syntax that must be rewritten in PL/pgSQL, Oracle sequences replaced with PostgreSQL SERIAL or generated columns, and Oracle-specific date arithmetic functions replaced with PostgreSQL equivalents. We work through the SCT report manually, rewrite the incompatible objects, and test the converted schema against a data sample from the source database before the migration runs. Application queries that use engine-specific SQL are also reviewed and updated as part of the schema conversion engagement.
Database migration cost depends on three factors: database size, the number of databases being migrated, and whether schema conversion between engines is required. Like-for-like migrations (PostgreSQL on-prem to PostgreSQL on RDS) for a single database of moderate size typically run $15,000 to $30,000. Multi-database migrations or databases over 1TB typically run $30,000 to $60,000. Cross-engine migrations that require schema conversion (Oracle to PostgreSQL, MSSQL to Aurora) add schema conversion and testing effort and typically run $40,000 to $80,000 depending on stored procedure and schema complexity. We scope every migration based on a discovery engagement, database inventory, size assessment, schema analysis, and a review of application query patterns that may be affected by the migration.
Work with us
We scope Database Migration Services in 30 minutes. You walk away with a clear cost, timeline, and approach. No commitment required.