Real-time voice discussion platform
- 300+
- users in real-time audio discussions
GraphQL API Development Services
GraphQL lets API consumers request exactly the data they need, no more, no less. A mobile app that needs a user's name and avatar doesn't receive the full user object. A dashboard that needs nested relationships gets them in a single request rather than multiple round trips. The client specifies the shape of the data and the API delivers it.
RaftLabs builds GraphQL APIs using Apollo Server and GraphQL Yoga for Node.js backends, with schema design, resolver implementation, DataLoader for N+1 query prevention, authentication and authorization at the resolver level, and schema documentation. For teams replacing a REST API that has become unwieldy to extend, or for new products with multiple client types that need different data shapes.
Schema design that models your business domain cleanly, types, queries, mutations, and subscriptions for real-time data
DataLoader implementation to prevent N+1 queries that make GraphQL slow in production
Field-level authorization so different client types see only the fields they're permitted to access
GraphQL Playground and schema introspection documentation that developers can use without reading separate docs
Recent outcomes
Voice AI · Research
6× deeper insights
Text-based interviews converted to automated phone calls
AI Automation · Ops
20k+ txns day one
Manual invoice OCR across 40+ gas stations
Loyalty · Retail
1,062 users in 4 weeks
SuperValu & Centra loyalty platform with receipt validation
SaaS · Logistics
2,000+ shipments yr 1
Multi-carrier shipping hub for Indonesian eCommerce
The problem
Are your REST API clients (mobile, web, partner) each receiving oversized payloads because the API was designed for the most data-hungry consumer and everyone else gets the excess?
Is adding a new field to your REST API responses causing breaking changes for clients that don't need the field?
Short answer
RaftLabs builds GraphQL APIs with Apollo Server or GraphQL Yoga: schema design, resolvers, DataLoader for N+1 prevention, field-level authorization, query-cost limiting, and real-time subscriptions for mobile, web, and partner clients that share one schema. A first single-domain GraphQL layer starts around $25,000 to $45,000 and grows to $60,000 to $130,000 for federation and subscriptions. A validated v1 ships in 6 to 14 weeks at a fixed cost.
Key takeaways
Trusted by


GraphQL solves a problem REST handles badly: several client types with different data requirements hitting one API surface. A mobile app might want three fields; a web dashboard wants thirty. A REST endpoint that returns all thirty over-serves the mobile app and makes it download payload it throws away. When a screen needs nested relationships, REST assembles them across several calls. One GraphQL query returns the exact shape the client asked for.
GraphQL earns its bad performance reputation only when teams skip the work that makes it fast in production. The N+1 problem is the usual culprit: each item in a list fires its own database call, so a list of 50 becomes 51 round trips. DataLoader batches those into one. Query-cost and depth limits stop a client from composing a query that quietly melts your database. We build all of this into every project, not as a later add-on.
Adoption backs the shift. GraphQL now reaches 33% of developers (Postman, 2025 State of the API Report), and Gartner projects more than 60% of enterprises will run it in production by 2027, up from under 30% in 2024 (Gartner, "When to Use GraphQL to Accelerate API Delivery," 2024). Almost all of them serve mobile, web, and partner clients that outgrew a single REST contract.
Getting to production takes more than a schema. Persisted queries lock live clients to approved query hashes, and because those become plain GET requests, a CDN can cache them at the edge. Response caching keyed by type and id keeps hot objects off the database. We wire cost limiting, persisted queries, and caching in from the start, so the API holds its speed as query traffic grows.
Capabilities
Type definitions that model your business domain accurately rather than mirroring database tables: object types, inputs, enums, interfaces, and unions, plus queries, mutations, and subscriptions. Interface and union types handle polymorphic data in a single query, and Relay-compatible cursor pagination works natively. We review the schema before anyone writes a resolver: a naming problem caught in review takes minutes to fix, but becomes a breaking change once clients integrate.
Resolver functions for every field, with the resolver layer separated from the service layer so business logic can be tested independently and reused by REST endpoints or background jobs. Context injection provides database connections, the authenticated user, and DataLoader instances per request, errors return structured GraphQL codes with partial success, and Apollo Server plugins add request tracing and slow-field detection.
DataLoader implementation for every resolver that fetches related data, batching database calls within a single request. The N+1 problem is GraphQL's most common production failure: 50 articles with their authors means 51 queries without DataLoader, 2 with it. Instances are scoped per request, query complexity analysis and depth limiting reject queries that would generate unbounded database load, and persisted queries lock production clients to approved query hashes.
JWT or session authentication validated in GraphQL context before any resolver runs, so a failed check short-circuits the whole request. Field-level authorization with graphql-shield or custom directives lets public, partner, and admin clients share one schema while each sees only the fields their role permits. RBAC and ABAC patterns live at the resolver layer, and an unauthorized field returns a structured FORBIDDEN error for that field alone.
Subscription implementation for real-time data over WebSocket, pushing updates to connected clients instead of forcing them to poll. Built on Apollo Server with graphql-ws, authentication is validated during the WebSocket handshake, Redis-backed PubSub shares subscription events across server instances, and events filter server-side per subscription so a client watching one order receives only that order's updates.
GraphQL Playground and Apollo Sandbox for interactive schema exploration, with auth headers configured so developers test authenticated queries in the docs. Documentation lives as SDL descriptions in the schema itself, served via introspection, so it never drifts from the implementation, and Apollo Federation 2 composes multiple GraphQL services into one unified graph behind an Apollo Router gateway. Versioning uses @deprecated annotations for additive changes.
Tell us your client types, the data relationships that are difficult to express in your current API, and what you're trying to solve. We'll scope it and give you a fixed cost.
API Development Services, full API development capability overview
REST API Development, REST APIs for standard integration patterns
Third-Party API Integration, connecting your GraphQL API to external data sources
API Gateway Development, API gateway for managing multiple API surfaces
What clients say
Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

All of the sprints were completed on schedule and on budget. We highly recommend RaftLabs!
01 / 02
Stay on topic

Article
Cost to Build a CRM Like HubSpot: Architecture, Phases, and When to Go Custom
CRM platform development costs $45K-$220K. This guide covers when to build vs buy, cost by phase, who the real buyers are, where projects fail, and how RaftLabs approaches these builds for SaaS companies and vertical markets.
Read more
Article
How to Build a CRM Like HubSpot: Custom Build Guide for Niche Businesses
HubSpot costs $24,000-$60,000 per year for a 10-person team. The cost to build a custom CRM like HubSpot starts at $60,000-$100,000 once. Here is who should build one, what phases to ship, and where these projects fail.
Read more
Article
Salesforce vs custom CRM: How to know when to switch
Salesforce works for most teams. Then it doesn't. Here is how to tell if you've hit the wall - and what building a custom CRM actually costs and delivers.
Read moreGraphQL is the better choice when you have multiple client types with different data requirements (mobile, web, third-party) that would benefit from fetching exactly what they need; when your data has complex relationships that require multiple REST round trips to assemble; or when your schema evolves frequently and you want to add fields without versioning the API. REST is simpler when your clients have uniform data requirements, when your team is not familiar with GraphQL tooling, or when you have simple CRUD operations without complex relationships. Both are valid, the choice follows your client diversity and schema complexity.
Query complexity analysis assigns a cost to each field in the query and rejects queries whose total cost exceeds a configured limit. Depth limiting rejects queries that nest beyond a maximum depth. Both are implemented at the server level before resolvers execute. Persisted queries, where production clients only send a query hash rather than the full query text, prevent arbitrary query construction entirely, and are the most effective defense for production APIs where the client code is controlled.
Yes. Many production APIs serve a GraphQL endpoint for flexible client queries alongside REST endpoints for specific use cases: webhooks (which are inherently REST callbacks), file uploads (which REST handles more naturally than GraphQL multipart), and integrations with third-party systems that expect REST. A common pattern is a GraphQL endpoint for frontend clients alongside REST endpoints for partner integrations and internal service-to-service calls. The two don't need to be an either-or decision.
Both compose several GraphQL services into one graph, but they split the work differently. Schema stitching merges schemas at a gateway where you hand-write the type merging and conflict resolution, so the gateway holds the composition logic and every change ripples back to it. Apollo Federation moves ownership to the subgraphs: each service declares the types it owns and how they connect through directives, and the router composes the supergraph from that. For a handful of stable services, stitching is fine. For many teams shipping independently, federation scales better because no single gateway file becomes the bottleneck. We default to Federation 2 for new multi-service graphs.
A first GraphQL layer over a single domain, with schema design, resolvers, DataLoader, and field-level authorization, starts around $25,000 to $45,000. As you add subscriptions, federation across services, and a query-cost and depth-limiting layer, it grows to $60,000 to $130,000. You get a fixed cost agreed before development starts.
Work with us
We scope GraphQL API Development in 30 minutes. You walk away with a clear cost, timeline, and approach. No commitment required.