REST API Development Services

REST API development for contracts other teams can rely on.

RaftLabs designs REST APIs for products, partners, and internal systems that need explicit rules for resources, authorization, errors, retries, pagination, and change. We start with one bounded domain and one real consumer, then expand after the contract survives integration.

See our work

Bring the problem, the current workflow, or the existing code. We reply with a practical next step within one business day.

The brief

Start with what is not working.

Good software decisions begin with the constraint, not a list of features or a preferred technology.

01

Are teams interpreting the same endpoint differently because examples, errors, and permission rules are incomplete?

02

Can you retry a timed-out write or change the API without duplicating work or breaking a consumer?

Plain answer

REST API development turns a business capability into a stable HTTP contract. RaftLabs defines resources, authorization, errors, retries, pagination, tests, monitoring, and OpenAPI documentation. A first production domain for one real consumer starts at $15,000 and usually takes 6 to 10 weeks.

An endpoint can work and still leave every consumer guessing.

One team treats a missing field as empty. Another treats it as an error. A timed-out write is retried and creates a duplicate. A partner learns about a breaking response change from its customers.

A dependable REST API makes those decisions part of the contract. Consumers know what may be sent, what each failure means, what can be retried, and how change reaches them.

Adjacent API proof

customers migrated without reported service disruption
200+
UrShipper client report
shipments across 70+ countries in year one
2,000+
UrShipper client report
transactions in the first three months
10,000
RaftLabs mobile POS project record

These projects required external contracts, retries, reconciliation, and live operating controls. They are adjacent API proof, not presented as dedicated public REST API engagements.

Custom REST API work pays off when the interface is a business boundary.

If one standard connector covers the need, configuring it is usually the better investment.

A fit
01

Applications, enterprise customers, or partners need a stable interface to the same capability.

02

Permissions, retries, webhooks, or version changes carry material operating risk.

03

A representative consumer can review examples and integrate with the first domain.

Not a fit
01

A supported connector already covers the workflow and data volume.

02

The underlying ownership and business rules are still changing every week.

03

The request is a one-time data transfer rather than an interface that must be operated.

Scope

What the first production domain includes

  • 01

    Contract and resource design

    Resources, operations, schemas, validation, status codes, errors, pagination, filtering, examples, and change rules are reviewed with a real consumer. The OpenAPI description stays with the implementation.
  • 02

    Identity and authorization

    The design separates caller identity from operation, object, and property permissions. Negative tests check that a valid caller cannot read or change another tenant's records.
  • 03

    Reliable writes and webhooks

    Idempotency, duplicate detection, signature verification, retries, dead-letter handling, and reconciliation are defined around the business operation rather than added after an incident.
  • 04

    Tests, observability, and handover

    Contract and integration tests run with deployment. Request correlation, useful error categories, metrics, alerts, examples, and a runbook give the receiving team a supportable service.

REST or GraphQL: which interface fits?

REST vs GraphQL

RESTGraphQL
Best fitStable resource operations and partner contractsDifferent first-party clients need different connected views
ContractEndpoints, HTTP methods, schemas, and status codesTyped schema, fields, queries, and mutations
CachingHTTP semantics can make shared caching directUsually needs operation-aware or application caching
Main riskInconsistent endpoints and version driftUnbounded queries and resolver cost
Choose whenConventions reduce consumer effortQuery flexibility removes meaningful client work

The broader API development services page maps the category. If your problem is consuming an external provider rather than publishing your own interface, see third-party API integration.

How it works

From consumer workflow to a production contract

One complete domain is more useful than dozens of ambiguous endpoints.

  1. Phase 1
    01

    Map consumers and failure costs

    Define callers, operations, ownership, permissions, likely retries, and the cost of a missed or duplicated request.

  2. Phase 2
    02

    Review the contract

    Agree resources, schemas, errors, pagination, change rules, and representative examples with the first consumer.

  3. Phase 3
    03

    Prove one domain

    Develop the vertical slice with authorization, tests, observability, deployment, documentation, and realistic failure cases.

  4. Phase 4
    04

    Integrate and release

    Onboard the consumer, resolve ambiguity before it spreads, watch live behaviour, and record who operates each dependency.

The contract details that prevent expensive incidents

The OpenAPI Specification provides a language-neutral description that people and software can read. RFC 9110 defines HTTP method semantics, while RFC 9457 defines a reusable problem format for HTTP APIs. These standards give the project common language; they do not decide the business rules.

Authorization stops at login
Authentication identifies the caller. Every operation must still check the record and properties that caller may access. OWASP ranks broken object-level authorization first in its 2023 API Security Top 10.
POST retries lack reconciliation
An idempotency key at the HTTP edge cannot stop a downstream worker or provider from repeating the same business operation. The stable operation identity must travel through the workflow.
Documentation is written after release
Examples and schema decisions need consumer review before implementation expands. Otherwise the document records ambiguity instead of resolving it.
Deprecation has no usage evidence
A date alone does not prove clients migrated. Consumer inventory, usage telemetry, migration tests, and contractual obligations determine when an old version can retire.

Read the OWASP API Security Top 10 for the primary security risk categories. We turn the relevant categories into project-specific controls and tests rather than claiming a framework makes the API secure.

Proof from API-dependent products

The UrShipper case study documents five carrier services, Shopify integration, more than 200 customers moved without reported disruption, and more than 2,000 shipments across 70+ countries in year one. The mobile POS case study documents signature-verified webhooks, queued event processing, idempotent workers, reconciliation, and 10,000 transactions in three months.

Those records show relevant delivery mechanics. Neither is represented as a universal uptime, throughput, or migration guarantee.

Scope and price

A first REST API domain starts at $15,000.

One real consumer, one bounded resource domain, and the contract, tests, release, and handover path around it.

A narrow proof may fit the $8,000 to $20,000 micro-project band. Multi-domain platforms grow in phases after the first consumer succeeds.

Starting investment

Starts at $15,000

A first production domain usually takes 6 to 10 weeks. Authorization, external dependencies, and migration move the estimate most.

Scope before implementation

We agree the consumer, resource boundary, contract decisions, acceptance tests, timeline, and phase price before production work begins.

Owned handover

The agreed deliverables include the API description, source, tests, deployment files created for the project, and operating documentation.

Useful next steps

More on integrations & APIs

Common questions

A sensible first phase covers one resource domain and one real consumer. It includes the API contract, authentication and authorization, request and response schemas, errors, pagination where needed, safe retry behaviour, OpenAPI documentation, automated tests, deployment, monitoring, and a handover runbook.

REST is a strong fit for stable resource operations, partner interfaces, predictable HTTP behaviour, and broad tooling support. GraphQL can fit when several first-party clients need different views over connected data. Some products use both at different boundaries.

We define authorization at operation, object, and property level, then test allowed and denied cases. Every endpoint receiving an object identifier must verify that the caller may access that specific object rather than trusting possession of the identifier.

For writes that may be retried, we define an application-level idempotency contract. A stable key is bound to the caller and request payload, concurrent requests have explicit behaviour, and downstream queues or external systems use the same business operation identity for reconciliation.

A first production resource domain starts around $15,000 and usually takes 6 to 10 weeks. More consumer types, complex authorization, external dependencies, webhooks, migration, and operational tooling increase the scope. The phase price is fixed after contract discovery.

Work with us

Bring us the API contract nobody agrees on.

Show us one consumer, one resource domain, and the failures already costing time. We will scope the smallest credible release.

  • Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
  • Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
  • Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
  • 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
  • All conversations are NDA-protected.