• Are your network operations teams reactive -- finding out about performance degradation from customer complaints rather than from network monitoring?

  • Is capacity planning still based on historical averages rather than demand forecasting that accounts for geographic and temporal variability?

  • When a network incident occurs, how long does it take to identify the root cause -- and how much of that time is engineers manually correlating data across multiple monitoring systems?

AI for Telecom Network Optimisation

Network performance AI that predicts faults before customers experience service degradation, identifies underutilised and overloaded network segments, and surfaces root cause faster when incidents occur.

For network operations teams managing growing traffic volumes with finite spectrum and infrastructure investment.

  • Predictive fault detection from network telemetry that surfaces degradation signals before service impact occurs

  • Capacity demand forecasting by cell, region, and time window for proactive capacity management

  • Automated root cause analysis that correlates fault signals across network layers to identify cause faster

  • QoS monitoring with anomaly detection and impact-severity classification for triage prioritisation

RaftLabs builds AI telecom network optimisation software for operators -- covering predictive fault detection from network telemetry, capacity planning and demand forecasting, traffic routing optimisation, QoS monitoring and anomaly detection, and root cause analysis automation for network incidents. AI network optimisation reduces unplanned service degradation and improves mean time to resolution for network faults.

Vodafone
Aldi
Nike
Microsoft
Heineken
Cisco
Calorgas
Energia Rewards
GE
Bank of America
T-Mobile
Valero
Techstars
East Ventures
Products shipped
100+
Industries served
24+
Cost delivery
Fixed
Week delivery cycles
12-16

Network operations that are still primarily reactive have a cost they do not always quantify

An unplanned outage in a high-traffic cell causes customer experience degradation, service credits, and potential churn. Network Operations Centres that discover service quality issues from customer complaints or helpdesk ticket volumes are discovering them after the damage has started. The monitoring data that would have predicted the fault was generated -- it just was not being watched for the right signals.

AI network optimisation puts predictive intelligence on top of the monitoring data your network infrastructure already generates. Fault prediction, capacity forecasting, and root cause acceleration from the telemetry and performance data your NOC already collects.

What we build

Predictive fault detection

Machine learning models trained on your network telemetry data and historical fault records to predict equipment failures and service degradation before they cause customer impact. For LTE and 5G NR networks, cell-level KPIs monitored include RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power), RSRQ (Reference Signal Received Quality), SINR (Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio), CQI (Channel Quality Indicator), PRB (Physical Resource Block) utilisation, handover success rate, and call drop rate -- the standard 3GPP KPI set that captures both coverage quality and capacity pressure at the cell level. Statistical baseline modelling uses a 28-day rolling Z-score baseline per KPI per cell, with anomaly detection triggering when Z exceeds 2.5 -- a threshold calibrated to balance sensitivity against alert fatigue based on your network's historical variance. For NR 5G NSA (Non-Standalone) and SA (Standalone) architectures, X2/Xn interface KPIs covering secondary cell addition and EN-DC (E-UTRA-NR Dual Connectivity) bearer setup success rates are included alongside LTE anchor cell KPIs to detect degradation patterns specific to dual-connectivity operation. Drive test data from TEMS Discovery or NEMO Outdoor is ingested and correlated with network-side KPIs to validate predictions against customer-experienced signal quality. Prediction output: probability of fault within a defined time window with the contributing signals surfaced for NOC engineer review. Early warning that shifts the NOC response from reactive to proactive.

Capacity planning and demand forecasting

Demand forecasting by network segment, geographic cell, and time period for proactive capacity management. Cell-level PRB utilisation trends are decomposed into organic growth, seasonal patterns, and event-driven spikes so the capacity model distinguishes durable demand growth from temporary peaks. SON (Self-Organising Network) parameter optimisation recommendations are generated automatically for cells where antenna tilt, transmit power, or load-balancing parameters are identified as contributing to utilisation imbalance -- for Ericsson, Nokia, and Huawei network elements, vendor-specific SON parameter sets are used to generate configuration recommendations that can be reviewed and applied via the NMS API (Ericsson Network Manager, Nokia NetAct, Huawei iMaster NCE). Fronthaul and backhaul capacity analysis covers the transport layer alongside radio capacity -- identifying cells where radio capacity is adequate but backhaul bandwidth is the limiting factor before a radio upgrade is commissioned. Capacity headroom reports identify segments approaching utilisation limits based on projected growth rate, giving your planning team a 90-day and 180-day forward view of where capacity investment is needed. SLA compliance tracking covers MTTR (Mean Time to Repair), MTTD (Mean Time to Detect), and network availability SLA targets per cell and per region, reported against your commercial SLA commitments. The evidence layer for capital expenditure prioritisation decisions.

Automated root cause analysis

Root cause acceleration for network incidents by correlating fault signals across network layers, equipment types, and geographic regions automatically. Network topology graph analysis maps neighbour cell relationships (the X2/Xn interface topology for LTE and NR), physical adjacency between sites, and shared transport segments -- so when a degradation pattern affects a cluster of cells, the system can determine whether the fault is at a shared upstream node (transport, baseband, power) or is cell-specific. When a performance incident is detected, the system queries historical fault patterns for similar signal combinations, correlated upstream and downstream KPI changes within the network topology graph, and equipment maintenance history from your OSS (NetCracker, Amdocs, or Ericsson OSS) to surface the most likely root cause candidates. OSS/BSS integration with NetCracker, Amdocs, Ericsson OSS, and Nokia NetAct brings in maintenance windows, configuration change events, and alarm history alongside the telemetry data so the system can identify whether a recent configuration change or planned maintenance correlates with an incident onset. Root cause hypotheses are presented with supporting evidence and confidence scores rather than requiring engineers to manually correlate data from five different monitoring systems. MTTD is reduced by surfacing relevant context within minutes of incident onset rather than requiring manual data assembly across platforms.

QoS monitoring and anomaly detection

Quality of Service monitoring across your key performance indicators for LTE and 5G NR: call setup success rate, voice MOS (Mean Opinion Score), data throughput per cell and per user, PDCP layer packet loss rate, latency (user-plane round-trip time), RSRP, RSRQ, and SINR distribution across the coverage area. For each KPI at each cell level, a 28-day rolling Z-score baseline captures the normal variation pattern for that cell at that time of day and day of week. Anomaly detection triggers when the Z-score for a KPI exceeds 2.5 standard deviations from the rolling baseline -- sensitive enough to catch developing degradation before it crosses the static alarm thresholds in your NMS, but specific enough to avoid the alert fatigue that comes from threshold-based monitoring that fires on every minor fluctuation. Impact severity classification assesses each anomaly by affected user count (estimated from active session data), revenue exposure (based on the service type and SLA tier), and SLA compliance risk (MTTD and MTTR budget remaining before breach) to determine triage priority. The QoS intelligence that gives your NOC team a prioritised, evidence-based picture of service quality across every cell in the network without manually checking individual KPI dashboards in the NMS.

Network performance dashboards

Operational dashboards for NOC teams, engineering managers, and senior leadership -- each role configured with the view relevant to their function. NOC operator view: real-time network health overview showing active incidents by severity, sites with degraded KPIs (RSRP, SINR, call drop rate, PRB utilisation above 80%), and maintenance windows in progress. Cell performance heat maps display throughput, utilisation, and QoS by geographic area so coverage gaps and congestion hotspots are visible without querying the NMS directly. Engineering view: trending KPI charts per cell over selectable time windows, handover success rate analysis across neighbour pairs, and drive test data overlay for coverage validation against network-side KPIs. Historical trend views support SLA reporting -- availability per cell, per site, and per region calculated against MTTR and network availability SLA targets. Incident timeline view for post-incident analysis shows the sequence of KPI changes, alarm events, configuration changes, and engineer actions from detection through resolution. Executive reporting: network availability percentage, customer-impacting event count, MTTD and MTTR trends, and SLA compliance status over the reporting period. Dashboards are built on your existing data infrastructure -- ingesting from your OSS, NMS, and telemetry store rather than requiring a separate data warehouse in most implementations.

Incident management integration

Integration with your existing incident management and ticketing systems -- ServiceNow (via REST API and Flow Designer), Jira Service Management, BMC Remedy, or your custom ITSM platform. Automatic incident creation when AI detection triggers above a defined severity threshold, with the relevant KPI data (RSRP, SINR, call drop rate, PRB utilisation), Z-score anomaly details, root cause hypotheses, and affected cell list pre-populated in the ticket so the assigned engineer has the diagnostic context immediately without querying the NMS separately. Incident correlation prevents duplicate tickets when the same underlying fault generates alarms from multiple monitoring sources -- the system identifies that a common upstream cause links multiple cell alarms and creates a single parent incident with child correlations rather than five separate tickets for five cells that share a failed transport node. Escalation routing is based on fault type, affected customer count, SLA exposure, and time-of-day so a major outage during business hours follows a different path than a degradation event at 3am. MTTD and MTTR are tracked per incident and reported against your SLA targets over rolling 30-day, 90-day, and 12-month periods. Post-incident analysis exports the full incident timeline -- detection, first response, diagnosis, resolution -- for customer SLA reporting and internal review. The connection between AI detection and the human response workflow that acts on it, without requiring a change to your existing NOC processes.

Frequently asked questions

Network optimisation AI works with the telemetry your network infrastructure already generates. For LTE and 5G NR mobile networks: eNodeB and gNodeB KPIs including RSRP, RSRQ, SINR, CQI distribution, PRB utilisation, call setup success rate, handover success rate, and call drop rate -- exported from your NMS (Ericsson Network Manager, Nokia NetAct, Huawei iMaster NCE) via performance management file (PM file) collection or direct API. Alarm logs from your NMS and EMS platforms provide the historical fault labels needed to train the anomaly detection models. Drive test data from TEMS Discovery or NEMO Outdoor is ingested and correlated with network-side KPIs to validate prediction accuracy against measured customer experience. For fixed and IP networks: interface utilisation and error counters from SNMP polling or streaming telemetry via gRPC with OpenConfig YANG models, BGP route change events, and optical performance monitoring data from ROADM and OTN layers. For transport networks, fronthaul and backhaul interface utilisation data is required to support the capacity analysis module. Most mature LTE and 5G NR networks generate sufficient KPI telemetry for predictive analytics without additional instrumentation. The data assessment phase at the start of the project determines what is available, at what granularity, and what additional collection would improve prediction accuracy.

We integrate with existing NMS, OSS, and monitoring platforms rather than replacing them. For Ericsson environments, we use Ericsson Network Manager's northbound REST APIs and PM file collection via SFTP to pull KPI counter data and alarm history. For Nokia, we integrate with Nokia NetAct via its CORBA northbound interface or REST APIs depending on the NetAct version. For Huawei, we use the Huawei U2000 or iMaster NCE northbound interface (MTOSI/CORBA or REST) for KPI export and alarm data. For multi-vendor environments, we build a vendor-normalisation layer that maps each vendor's KPI counter names to a common schema so the analytics models work across vendor boundaries without separate configurations per vendor. For IP and transport monitoring, we integrate with Zabbix, Prometheus, and vendor EMS platforms via SNMP, gRPC streaming telemetry, or database connection. For OSS/BSS integration covering alarm management, work orders, and configuration data, we connect to NetCracker, Amdocs, and Ericsson OSS via their published APIs. For networks with limited centralised telemetry collection, we design a telemetry aggregation layer that pulls from distributed sources into a time-series database (InfluxDB or TimescaleDB) suitable for AI processing. Integration scope is mapped in full during the discovery phase.

A focused implementation covering predictive fault detection and QoS anomaly monitoring for a defined network scope (single technology layer or geographic region) typically delivers in 12-16 weeks. Broader implementations adding capacity forecasting, root cause analysis, and dashboard delivery for a full multi-technology network run 16-24 weeks. Timeline depends on telemetry data quality, integration complexity, and number of network elements. We deliver in phases so you have working fault prediction operational before the full scope is complete.

Yes. AI network optimisation is designed to augment your NOC team, not replace your existing tools. Your existing NMS continues to handle alarm management and configuration. The AI layer adds predictive intelligence, anomaly detection, and root cause acceleration on top of it. NOC engineers use their existing workflows and tools, with AI-generated alerts and root cause information surfaced as additional context in the incident ticket or a NOC dashboard. Integration with your existing incident management workflow ensures that AI detections enter the same handling process as other alerts. We work within your current NOC operating model.

What clients say

What our clients say

Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

Charles E.
Charles E.
USA
Entrepreneur at Aggie Technologies

All of the sprints were completed on schedule and on budget. We highly recommend RaftLabs!

01 / 02

Related services

Talk to us about your network optimisation project.

Tell us your network type, monitoring infrastructure, and the specific performance problem you are trying to solve. We will scope the AI system and give you a fixed cost.