Talk to us about your media CMS project.
Tell us your content types, publishing channels, and what your current system can't handle. We'll scope a CMS and give you a fixed cost.
Editorial team publishing to website, app, social, and newsletter from four different systems with no shared content store -- the same article reformatted four times?
Content archive with no searchable metadata, so journalists rebuilding research that's already been done because they can't find what's in the system?
One content record that publishes to your website, mobile app, email newsletter, and social channels -- with editorial workflow, digital asset management, and monetisation built in from the start.
We build custom CMS platforms for media companies, publishers, and broadcasters that need more control over their content infrastructure than WordPress or Contentful provides.
Structured content modelling for articles, video, audio, and live content
Editorial workflow -- drafts, review, approval, scheduling
Multi-channel publishing -- web, app, email, social
Digital asset management with metadata and search
A custom media CMS is built around the content types, editorial workflows, and publishing channels of a specific media organisation -- rather than adapting a general-purpose CMS to fit. It manages articles, video, audio, live blogs, and galleries in a structured content model, routes content through editorial approval, and publishes to web, app, email, and social from a single record. RaftLabs builds custom media content management systems for publishers, broadcasters, and digital media companies.
Editorial teams at media companies spend a disproportionate amount of time managing the publishing process rather than producing content. An article written in one tool is reformatted for the app, copied into the email platform, and manually adapted for social -- four versions of the same content managed separately, with no single source of truth and no consistent metadata across channels.
The archive problem compounds over time. Content produced years ago has value for SEO, for reference journalism, and for content packages -- but only if it is findable. A CMS without structured metadata and full-text search means journalists start from scratch rather than building on what was already published.
A custom media CMS is built around the content types your editorial team actually produces, the channels you publish to, and the workflow your organisation uses. It is not a general-purpose CMS configured with plugins to approximate media publishing -- it is designed for the job from the start.
Flexible content types designed for your editorial output -- article, video, podcast episode, live blog, photo gallery, and interactive feature -- each with fields appropriate to that format rather than every type inheriting a generic body copy field that does not fit. Structured fields for headline, deck, body copy, byline, tags, categories, SEO metadata, and channel-specific metadata that varies by destination. A headless CMS architecture delivers content through a REST or GraphQL API so any front-end -- web, mobile app, OTT platform, or email rendering engine -- can query exactly the fields it needs without the CMS being coupled to a particular output format. Content relationships link related articles, define series and topic hubs, and associate pieces to author profiles. Schema versioning allows content types to evolve -- adding new fields, deprecating old ones -- without breaking existing content records or requiring a migration for the full archive. Content search powered by Elasticsearch or Algolia indexes every structured field so a journalist can find a four-year-old article by topic, byline, keyword, or date range in under a second rather than scrolling through paginated archive views. WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility checks on published content flag missing alt text, low contrast, and heading hierarchy violations before content goes live. The structured model is what makes every piece of content publishable across all channels without manual reformatting and auditable for quality compliance without a manual checklist.
Draft, review, and published states with configurable approval routing -- a breaking news piece can bypass the standard three-stage review and go direct from writer to editor to publish, while a long-form investigation follows a full legal and editorial approval chain. Assignment of articles to specific editors with deadline tracking visible in a shared editorial calendar. Inline commenting and annotation tools attached directly to specific paragraphs or sentences so feedback is contextual to the content, not buried in a separate email thread that requires cross-referencing. Version history with diff view so editors can see exactly what changed between drafts -- which paragraph was rewritten, which source was removed, which headline was tested and replaced. Conflict-free collaborative editing using operational transformation, the same algorithm that powers Google Docs, so two editors can work on the same piece simultaneously without overwrites. Scheduled publish with configurable go-live times configurable per channel -- an article can be set to publish on the website at 6am, enter the morning email at 7am, and post to social at 10am, with each channel's timing locked at the point of writing rather than requiring a coordinator to watch a clock. GDPR consent gating for paywalled or subscriber-only content integrated directly into the workflow so an editor can mark a piece as metered, subscriber-only, or free without a developer code change. The workflow infrastructure that makes every editorial handoff visible, timed, and accountable without requiring a separate project management tool running in parallel.
Single content record published to web, mobile app, OTT platform, email newsletter, and social channels from one action. Channel-specific formatting applied at publish time using transformation rules defined per content type and destination -- image crops for the aspect ratio each channel requires, excerpt length for email, character limit for social post copy, and structured data payloads for mobile app content APIs. CDN integration with Cloudflare or Fastly distributes published web content from edge nodes globally with cache invalidation webhooks so updated or corrected content propagates to edge locations within seconds rather than waiting for a TTL expiry. Scheduled publishing with configurable go-live times per channel so the coordination task is embedded in the content record rather than handled by a distribution coordinator. Social post management handles platform-specific copy variants and link formats for Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook from a single compose interface. Push notification trigger for breaking news or priority content fires via APNs and FCM to mobile app subscribers who have opted into topic-based alerts. Reference CMS platforms like Contentful and Sanity demonstrate what structured content delivery APIs look like in production -- custom builds follow the same headless delivery pattern but with editorial workflow, digital asset management, and monetisation integrated rather than requiring separate tools. The publishing architecture that eliminates the four-system process and makes every piece of content available everywhere from a single edit.
Centralised media library for images, video, audio, and documents -- all stored in S3 with metadata indexed for search, so the full archive is accessible by query rather than by navigating folder hierarchies. On upload, images are processed via Cloudinary or Imgix for on-demand transformation: resize, crop to aspect ratio presets, format conversion to WebP for web delivery, and quality compression configured to balance file size against visual fidelity. AI-assisted tagging and keyword extraction on upload adds subject labels, scene descriptions, and object identifications without requiring manual metadata entry for every asset -- journalists uploading 30 images from a press conference do not need to tag each one individually. Rights and licence tracking records the photographer credit, usage restrictions, territory limitations, and licence expiry date attached to each asset, so the editorial team knows what they can use and where before publishing rather than discovering a rights violation after the fact. Version tracking for updated assets shows the change history and which published content items reference a given asset, useful when an asset needs to be replaced or recalled. Full-text search across all metadata fields means finding a specific image is a query, not a folder browse through 50,000 files organised by the person who uploaded them four years ago.
Paywall and metering logic for subscription and freemium content access -- hard paywall, metered access with a monthly free article allowance, or registration wall -- configurable per content type and category. GDPR consent gating for paywalled content ensures that subscriber data handling meets regulatory requirements, with consent records stored alongside the subscription record. Article-level paywall configuration lets editors mark content as free, metered, or subscriber-only at the point of writing without a developer change, so commercial editorial decisions stay with the editorial team. Ad slot management integrated with Google Ad Manager, Xandr, or a custom ad server, with content-level targeting signals -- content category, author, topic tags, keyword density -- passed to the ad server to improve yield on programmatic inventory. Sponsored content tagging and disclosure management marks commercial partnerships with configurable disclosure labels that meet FTC and ASA requirements without requiring a manual process. Affiliate link management handles click tracking, conversion attribution, and partner reporting from within the CMS rather than requiring a separate affiliate platform. The monetisation layer that connects editorial decisions -- what is free, what is gated, what carries commercial content labels -- directly to the revenue infrastructure, without requiring a developer change every time the commercial model adjusts.
Article-level engagement metrics -- page views, unique readers, scroll depth percentile, average time on content, and return visit rate -- displayed on the content record so the journalist and editor see the performance data alongside the piece without switching to a separate analytics tool. Referral source breakdown by article shows which distribution channels are driving traffic to which content types, so the team allocates effort toward the channels that actually reach the audience they are trying to build. Subscription conversion rate tracked by content piece, content type, and author gives the editorial team visibility into which journalism converts casual readers to paying subscribers -- information that has direct implications for content commissioning decisions. Live view counts for editors monitoring breaking news performance in real time, useful for deciding when to push a follow-up piece or trigger a social amplification action. Content search performance: which articles are being discovered via site search using which query terms, which queries return no results, and which high-volume searches lead to exit rather than engagement. The analytics layer is built inside the CMS so editorial decisions are informed by how content is actually performing -- not by a separate analytics dashboard that requires a data team member to pull the report and interpret it for the editorial room.
Frequently asked questions
WordPress works well for content-heavy sites where the standard article model fits and plugin availability covers the workflow requirements. It struggles with structured content that needs to publish across multiple channels simultaneously, high-traffic live publishing events where server-side rendering at scale becomes a bottleneck, and complex multi-stage editorial workflow that goes beyond what plugin-based workflow tools handle. Contentful and Sanity are strong headless CMS platforms with clean REST and GraphQL delivery APIs -- they handle structured content modelling and multi-channel delivery well. What they are not purpose-built for is editorial workflow with approval stages, digital asset management with rights tracking, monetisation logic, or Elasticsearch-powered content search with full metadata indexing. A custom CMS is the right call when your content types, workflow complexity, or multi-channel publishing requirements are specific enough that configuring a general-purpose platform requires workarounds significant enough to create daily editorial friction -- or when the total cost of platform licences, plugin subscriptions, and ongoing developer configuration time exceeds the cost of building the right infrastructure once.
Each content type has a defined output format for each channel, configured as a transformation template rather than hardcoded logic. When an editor publishes an article, the CMS applies the channel-specific transformation rules to produce the web page (HTML with structured data markup), the mobile app content payload (JSON via REST or GraphQL delivery API), the email newsletter HTML (table-based layout with inline styles), and the social post copy (platform-specific character-limited variants) -- all from the same structured content record without the editor touching any of it. Editors configure the channel-specific fields that vary: a different headline optimised for SEO vs. social, a specific image crop from the asset for email aspect ratio, a short teaser description for the push notification. These fields live in the content record alongside the main article but are only surfaced when the editor explicitly configures them -- the CMS does not require them to fill in every channel variant before publishing. CDN cache invalidation webhooks ensure that when an article is corrected or updated, the Cloudflare or Fastly edge cache clears within seconds rather than serving stale content until TTL expiry.
Live blogs are implemented as a content type with a real-time update feed -- editors post updates from a simple interface, each update is timestamped and ordered, and the page updates for readers without a full page reload. Breaking news publishing strips out draft and approval workflow and allows direct-to-publish from a designated editor role. Infrastructure for high-traffic events uses CDN caching for static content and edge-side includes for dynamic elements like comment counts or update timestamps, so the CMS server is not hit for every page view during a traffic spike. Load testing is part of the delivery process for platforms that expect high concurrent traffic events.
A core CMS covering article publishing, basic editorial workflow, digital asset management, web and email publishing, and subscriber access management typically delivers in 14 to 18 weeks. Adding native mobile app publishing, live blog, advanced monetisation, or a large content migration from a legacy system extends the timeline. We scope the feature set against your editorial and technical requirements before committing to a timeline. The scope document defines what is in the build and what is not, so the timeline is specific rather than a bracket that adjusts as the project runs.
What clients say
Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

I was pleased with RaftLabs team quality, consistency and execution.
01 / 02
Tell us your content types, publishing channels, and what your current system can't handle. We'll scope a CMS and give you a fixed cost.