• Production planning done in Excel with no real-time connection to actual machine availability or current inventory levels?

  • Last-minute material shortages stopping production because MRP wasn't run recently enough?

  • Planners manually allocating work orders to machines without visibility of current machine loading?

  • Schedule changes made verbally on the floor that never make it back to the planning tool?

Production Planning and Scheduling Software

Planning production in Excel means the plan is already wrong before the morning shift starts. Machine availability, current WIP, and inventory levels have changed since the file was last saved. Planners spend their day firefighting rather than planning because the tool they have doesn't reflect reality.

We build custom production planning and scheduling software that connects to your live data. Demand, capacity, materials, and machine availability are checked together before a schedule is generated. Planners see what is feasible, not just what was asked for.

  • Demand-driven scheduling with capacity checking against machine and labour constraints

  • MRP tied to live BOM and current inventory so material shortages surface before they stop production

  • Finite scheduling with machine loading and Gantt visualization for planners and supervisors

  • Scenario planning and what-if analysis for capacity decisions without touching the live schedule

Production planning software converts demand signals into a feasible production schedule by checking capacity, materials, and constraints before committing to a plan. It replaces spreadsheet planning with a system that knows what machines are available, what materials are in stock, and what orders are already running. RaftLabs builds custom production planning and scheduling software that integrates with your ERP and reflects your actual factory constraints.

Vodafone
Aldi
Nike
Microsoft
Heineken
Cisco
Calorgas
Energia Rewards
GE
Bank of America
T-Mobile
Valero
Techstars
East Ventures
Products shipped
100+
Industries served
24+
Cost delivery
Fixed
Week delivery cycles
12-14

What good production planning software actually does

Most production planning problems are information problems. The planner knows the orders. They don't always know which machines are running, how much of a key component is actually on hand, or how long the setup between products takes on a specific machine. When the plan is built without that information, the schedule is optimistic and the floor ignores it.

A custom planning system connects those information sources so the plan reflects reality. Material availability comes from live inventory. Machine capacity comes from the current schedule and maintenance calendar. Labour availability comes from the shift plan. The output is a schedule that the floor can actually execute, not one that needs to be manually adjusted every morning.

We build production planning tools for make-to-order, make-to-stock, and mixed-mode manufacturers. The scheduling logic is built to match your constraints, whether that means sequence-dependent setups, shared tooling, or labour pools that move between work centres.

What we build

Demand-driven production scheduling

Convert customer orders, forecasts, and replenishment triggers into a prioritised production queue. The system applies S&OP (Sales and Operations Planning) logic to reconcile the demand plan with production capacity before committing to the schedule. Demand signals from your ERP -- whether from SAP SD, Oracle NetSuite sales orders, or a direct order management system -- are consumed in real time rather than in overnight batch runs. DDMRP (Demand Driven Material Requirements Planning) buffer sizing can be layered in to maintain strategic inventory buffers at decoupling points, reducing the bullwhip effect in mixed-mode environments.

The system checks due dates, customer priority, and current WIP position before generating the schedule. Planners see a ranked order list with demand dates and the calculated start date needed to meet them. Late orders are flagged before they become late. When new orders arrive mid-shift, the schedule is immediately recalculated using the current capacity snapshot, not the capacity snapshot from this morning's planning run. Priority tiers -- expedited, standard, and forecast replenishment -- are user-configurable so the scheduling logic matches the way your commercial team classifies demand, not a generic priority model.

Capacity planning against machine and labour constraints

Model your work centres, machines, and labour pools with their available hours, efficiency factors, and maintenance windows. Constraint-based scheduling applies finite capacity rules so no machine is overloaded. Bottleneck resources are identified using Theory of Constraints (TOC) methodology -- the system flags the capacity-limiting work centre in the current schedule and protects its throughput by keeping feeding operations from starving it and downstream operations from blocking it.

When orders are loaded against the schedule, the system checks available capacity and flags overloads before they are committed. Planners see machine loading by day or week in a Gantt-style resource view and can shift orders to balance the load. Changeover minimisation uses SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) methodology -- jobs are sequenced on shared machines to minimise total setup time based on the product family transition matrix. Labour constraints are checked alongside machine constraints so the schedule is feasible against both simultaneously, not in separate planning runs that produce conflicting output.

Material requirements planning

Run MRP II logic on demand rather than overnight. The system performs a full BOM explosion from the master production schedule, netting each component against on-hand inventory, open purchase orders, and scheduled receipts before generating requirements. Demand forecasting uses exponential smoothing to project forward consumption for make-to-stock items, with the smoothing coefficient configurable per item class. Lead time netting accounts for purchasing lead times, supplier lead times, and safety stock buffers defined in the item master.

Integration with SAP PP/APO or Oracle Demantra passes planned orders and purchase requisitions back to your ERP so procurement acts on system-generated recommendations rather than planner emails. Material shortages are linked to the specific production orders they affect so planners know exactly which orders are at risk and by how many days. When a purchase order receipt is confirmed in the ERP, the related material shortage is cleared and the production schedule adjusts automatically rather than waiting for the next overnight batch run.

Finite scheduling and machine loading

Schedule production orders to specific machines with finite capacity constraints applied at every work centre simultaneously. The scheduler respects machine availability, setup times between product families, minimum run quantities, and tooling constraints that tie specific jobs to specific machines. Sequence-dependent setups are modelled using a machine-level setup matrix, so the scheduler picks the job order that minimises total setup hours across the week rather than sequencing blindly by due date.

No order is scheduled to a machine that doesn't have the capacity to run it in the required window -- overloads are flagged at scheduling time rather than discovered when the shift starts. Machine loading views show each machine's schedule by shift, broken down by order, run time, and setup time. Supervisors see what is planned without needing to ask the planning team. When a machine goes down unplanned, the affected orders are immediately surfaced with an impact assessment showing which customer due dates are at risk and by how many hours.

Gantt visualization and schedule management

Interactive Gantt charts let planners drag and drop orders across machines and time, with the system validating capacity and material constraints as each move is made. If a drag operation would overload a machine or create a material shortage, the system flags the conflict before the move is committed rather than silently allowing it. Colour coding shows order status (released, in progress, complete), priority tier, and material availability at a glance, so the planner sees problem orders immediately without running a separate exception report.

Orders can be split across machines, merged into longer runs for efficiency, or locked to prevent the automatic scheduler from moving them. The lock function is useful for orders that are already kitted and in the queue -- the planner wants the optimizer to work around them rather than re-sequence them. Supervisors and production managers see a read-only Gantt view of the current schedule so they know what is planned for the shift without relying on a printed schedule from three hours ago. Schedule export to PDF is available for shift handover briefings on the floor.

Scenario planning and what-if analysis

Model capacity changes before committing to them. Add a machine, change shift patterns, bring in a subcontractor, adjust the product mix, or simulate the impact of a key material shortage, and see the effect on your schedule and customer delivery dates without touching the live plan. Scenarios are saved as named copies of the current schedule and can be compared side by side against the baseline or against each other, with an on-time delivery rate and average lead time shown per scenario to quantify the trade-offs.

The S&OP what-if layer lets supply chain planners model the next 8-to-13-week horizon, testing demand uplift assumptions against the finite capacity model before the monthly S&OP meeting. When a decision is made -- a new shift pattern approved, a subcontract arrangement confirmed -- the chosen scenario is promoted to the live schedule with a single action. All scenario history is retained for reference so the reasoning behind past capacity decisions is auditable. Capacity decisions are made on data from the scheduling model rather than on the planning team's best guess.

Frequently asked questions

Yes. ERP integration is a standard part of every production planning project we deliver. Common integration points include pulling open sales orders and demand forecasts, syncing inventory levels and on-hand balances, reading multi-level BOM structures, and pushing planned production orders or work orders back to the ERP for release and tracking. For SAP environments, we integrate via SAP PP/APO standard RFC calls or SAP S/4HANA OData APIs, depending on your system version. For Oracle NetSuite, we use the SuiteScript REST API. We have also integrated with Microsoft Dynamics 365, Epicor, and Infor M3 using their respective web service layers.

The integration specification -- which objects flow in each direction, how conflicts are resolved, and how often the sync runs -- is agreed during scoping so data flows are fully defined before development starts. Bidirectional sync frequency is configurable from real-time event-driven updates down to scheduled intervals, depending on what your ERP supports and what your planning team's workflow requires.

Sequence-dependent setups are modelled as a setup matrix that defines the changeover time for every product family-to-product family transition on each machine. The matrix is typically structured by product family rather than individual SKU, which keeps the matrix manageable as your product range grows. The scheduler uses the matrix when sequencing orders so that setup time is included in the capacity calculation and the total scheduled time per shift adds up correctly.

The SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) optimisation layer uses the matrix to find the sequence that minimises total setup hours across a machine's order queue for the planning horizon, subject to due date constraints. When due date urgency and setup minimisation conflict, the planner can adjust a configurable urgency weight to trade off one against the other. The matrix is maintained by your engineering or planning team through an admin interface and can be updated without a code change as your product mix evolves or as your engineering team refines the setup time data.

The system receives feedback from the shop floor through operator job confirmations in an MES, barcode scan events at work centre completions, or manual status updates entered by the supervisor. When actual progress diverges from the plan -- a job runs longer than scheduled, a machine goes down, or a batch fails quality inspection and needs to be re-run -- the remaining schedule is recalculated against current WIP and remaining capacity for the shift.

Planners see the updated picture as soon as the deviation is recorded. The exception view shows every order that has slipped from its planned completion time, ranked by impact on customer due dates. The planner can decide whether to resequence remaining orders, reallocate work to another machine with available capacity, authorise overtime, or let the floor catch up if the variance is within tolerance. TOC (Theory of Constraints) logic flags when the bottleneck resource is the source of the slip so the planner focuses recovery effort on the right work centre. The plan stays connected to reality throughout the shift rather than becoming a document that is ignored after 9am.

Yes. Outside processing operations are modelled as work centres with configurable lead time, capacity, and transit time constraints, just like any internal resource. When an order includes an outside processing step -- heat treatment, plating, NDT inspection, or any other subcontracted operation -- the system calculates the send date, the expected return date based on the supplier's lead time, and the downstream production start date that depends on the returned material arriving on time.

The procurement team is automatically notified to raise the subcontract purchase order when the send date falls within the planning horizon, giving enough lead time to confirm the slot with the supplier. If the subcontractor confirms a different return date than the system's lead time assumption, the planner can update the expected receipt date and the downstream schedule adjusts immediately. Lead time for the outside process is included in the critical path calculation for the delivery date so the plan reflects the actual production routing rather than treating the subcontract step as invisible.

What clients say

What our clients say

Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

Gil Nugraha
Gil Nugraha
Indonesia
Founder at UrShipper

I definitely recommend RaftLabs, especially to founders building complex platforms. They were transparent throughout the whole project.

01 / 02

Related services

  • Business Process Automation -- Automate production scheduling, quality inspection workflows, supplier purchase orders, and inventory replenishment
  • AI Agent Development -- AI agents for predictive equipment maintenance, defect detection, and production optimisation
  • Custom Software Development -- Custom MES, ERP modules, and production management platforms built for your manufacturing process

Let's talk about your production planning project

Tell us about your planning process and the constraints that make it hard. We'll scope a scheduling tool built around your factory, not the median factory.