Can you build equipment lifecycle management software that handles maintenance, logistics, and operational readiness in one system?

Yes. Equipment lifecycle management covering acquisition records, in-service maintenance history, spares logistics, planned maintenance scheduling, and operational readiness status is a core product type we build. Full traceability from acquisition to disposal is built in. Integration with legacy systems that have been in service for decades is part of the scope.

How do you handle security classification requirements for defence software?

Security classification requirements are scoped during discovery alongside the functional requirements. The classification level of the data determines the security architecture, the access control model, data residency, encryption standards, audit trail depth, and network segregation. We build to the security framework your organisation's security authority specifies, not a generic commercial standard.

What does defence software development cost?

Defence programmes run larger than commercial builds because of the documentation, security architecture, and integration burden. A focused first capability costs less than a full platform with training simulation, personnel management, and secure data architecture. We scope the programme in discovery and agree a fixed cost before development starts, with milestone-based payment.

Can you work with ITAR-controlled technical data?

ITAR shapes who can sit on the team, where the code and data are hosted, and how access is recorded. If your programme touches ITAR or EAR controlled technical data, we scope the staffing, hosting, and access controls in discovery before a line of code is written.

How do you approach CMMC compliance?

For US contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information, NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC Level 2 set the control baseline. That assessment is far easier to pass when the controls are designed into the architecture from the first sprint, not retrofitted before an audit.

Defence Software Development

Defence programmes run on software that has to survive security review, programme audit, and a procurement cycle that can outlast the technology it specified. We build the equipment, training, logistics, and compliance systems around your classification requirements, not around a commercial platform's defaults.

Equipment lifecycle management from acquisition through maintenance to disposal, with full traceability
Training simulation platforms and qualification tracking for large personnel bases
Logistics and spares management that talks to the legacy systems you cannot replace
Compliance evidence organised continuously against the contract's audit requirements

The problem

Sound familiar?

Equipment readiness data spread across paper records, legacy systems, and spreadsheets with no single operational picture?
Training qualification records with no systematic way to track currency across a large personnel base?
Audit preparation consuming weeks of engineer time manually assembling evidence before each programme review?

Short answer

Defence software development builds the systems defence contractors and government organisations run on: equipment lifecycle management, training simulation and qualification tracking, logistics and spares management, and compliance evidence for programme audits. The right route may be an existing platform, a configured system, or custom software built to the programme's security classification, data handling, and audit requirements. Classification controls, access restrictions, and audit trails are designed into the architecture from the first sprint, not retrofitted before an audit.

Trusted by

01 Diagnosis

Problems we solve in defence

01
Problem
Software that arrives already outdated
Solution
By the time a software system passes through the defence procurement process, the requirements defined years ago no longer match the threats of today. The technology specified in the contract has been superseded. As one practitioner guide puts it, the central answer to the Valley of Death between R and D and fielded capability is the process. We build in short sprints against the current requirement, with the architecture documented so each increment survives programme review.
02
Problem
Decades of systems, and nobody knows what the data means
Solution
Defence organisations are data hoarders. Maintenance history lives in one system, logistics in another, readiness in a spreadsheet. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO-23-105341), the F-35 fleet-wide mission-capable rate was approximately 55% in FY 2023 against an 80% target, with disconnected logistics software cited among the causes. A unified equipment lifecycle system integrates maintenance, logistics, and readiness status into one record the operations team can actually read.
03
Problem
The compliance burden falls on the smallest contractors
Solution
The Defense Industrial Base is tens of thousands of companies, many of them small businesses that now need CMMC Level 2. Vendor estimates put small-contractor CMMC costs at $30,000 to $150,000, and the cost of failing an assessment far above complying. We design the NIST SP 800-171 control baseline into the architecture from the first sprint, so the assessment is evidence you export, not a retrofit you fund.
04
Problem
Audit preparation assembled by hand, every time
Solution
When compliance evidence has to be pulled manually from maintenance systems, training records, and engineering documentation, the preparation exercise is expensive and the evidence is always assembled retrospectively. A compliance management platform that organises evidence continuously against the contract's audit requirements turns weeks of engineer time into a structured export.

02 What we ship

What we build

Equipment and asset lifecycle management
Equipment register covering every asset with serial number, acquisition date, location, operational status, and maintenance history. Scheduled service intervals, modification states, and inspection requirements maintained against each asset. Serviceability reporting showing fleet readiness by category and location. Asset disposal workflow managing decommissioning and disposal documentation at end of life.
Training simulation software
Scenario management covering design, parameter configuration, and version control for simulation-based training. Trainee performance recording capturing decisions, procedures followed, and measurable outcomes. After-action review tools with replay of key decision points against the standard. Qualification record management tracking currency for each trainee, and programme compliance reporting showing who is current against each required qualification.
Logistics and supply chain management
Spares management against demand signals from maintenance planning. Procurement workflow with supplier qualification, purchase order management, and goods receipt. Inter-depot transfer management. Cataloguing to NATO or applicable national stock number standards. Shelf-life management for items with limited storage life. The logistics platform that keeps the right parts at the right location without spreadsheet reconciliation.
Personnel and qualification management
Personnel records covering rank, posting history, clearance status, and qualifications held. Qualification frameworks defining the required qualifications and training pathway for each role. Currency tracking showing what is current, approaching expiry, or lapsed, for each individual and the organisation. Succession data identifying where critical qualifications are held by too few people.
Compliance and audit management
Compliance obligation register with ownership, due date, and evidence requirements for each obligation. Audit preparation workflow assembling the evidence package in the format the audit standard requires. Finding management with corrective actions assigned, tracked, and verified closed. Risk documentation at the level of detail the contract's risk management plan requires.
Secure data management
Role-based access control with clearance level management, so personnel only see data at or below their clearance. Data classification labelling enforced at the application level. Audit trail recording every access, modification, and export with user identity and timestamp. Data residency in the approved locations for each classification level. Secure API design for integration with other systems.

03 Buy, build, or wait

The defence software question is really about whether the requirement fits a platform, or whether the classification, integration, and audit burden demand a build.

Buy or rent

A COTS platform, for standard workflows
When the requirement is generic asset tracking or scheduling and the platform's security posture already meets the programme's bar.
Wait, while the requirement is forming
Early-stage programmes where the procurement route, the classification level, or the legacy landscape is still being defined.

Build custom

When the classification shapes the architecture
Clearance-level access, data residency, and audit trails designed in from the first sprint. No commercial platform models your programme's security framework natively.
When the legacy systems stay
Decades-old systems with no API. Custom adapters, file-based integration, and a data model built around what those systems can actually share.
When the audit is the product
Evidence organised continuously against the contract's requirements, exportable the day it is requested.

Bottom line

Stay on the platform while the workflows are standard and the security bar is already met. Build when the classification regime, the legacy integration, or the audit burden is the programme.

04 How we work

How we work with defence clients

01
Discovery
Map the programme scope, security classification requirements, legacy system landscape, and contract documentation standards before writing a line of code. Identify the integration points with existing systems, the access control model the classification framework requires, and the audit evidence structure the programme's compliance obligations demand. The risk this retires: the architecture the security review rejects.
02
Architecture
Design the data model around the specific programme: equipment and asset structures, qualification frameworks, logistics data flows, and the audit trail architecture the contract's assurance standard requires. Classification controls, access restrictions, data residency, and audit logging are designed in before development begins. The risk this retires: the controls retrofitted before the audit.
03
Build
Two-week sprints with working software and formal sprint documentation at each checkpoint. The core asset management or qualification tracking capability ships first. Compliance management, logistics integration, and legacy system adapters follow in subsequent sprints. The risk this retires: the system that arrives already outdated.
04
Launch and support
Phased deployment with formal acceptance testing against the programme's acceptance standard before go-live. Documentation produced to the level the procurement framework requires. Post-launch support covers regulatory changes, contract modifications, and operational improvements as the programme evolves. The risk this retires: the handover with no evidence trail.

05 Track record

What defence clients get when they work with us

Cost agreed before development starts, with milestone-based payment: Fixed

Building production software since: 2015

From discovery through launch and support: 1 team

06 Case studies

What we have built, and what defence adds on top

01
Problem
Straight answer first: we have not shipped a classified defence programme
Solution
We will not dress up adjacent work as a defence reference. What we have built is the machinery defence software runs on, in sectors that carry the same demands. On a civic engagement platform we designed a four-tier permission hierarchy and load-tested it before launch, with latency documented at each tier rather than asserted. A payment platform we built for a regulated operator was designed around audit-grade access controls, logging, and data handling. Our healthcare systems are built with HIPAA-grade access controls, with every record access tied to a named user in a log an auditor can read. Those are the primitives a defence programme asks for: access tied to clearance, an audit trail that survives review, evidence you can export the day it is requested.
02
Problem
What defence adds on top is the regime
Solution
If your programme touches ITAR or EAR controlled technical data, that shapes who can sit on the team, where the code and data are hosted, and how access is recorded. If you are a US contractor handling Controlled Unclassified Information, NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC Level 2 set the control baseline. Clearance is a hard constraint, not a footnote: personnel eligibility, facility requirements, and need-to-know access shape how the work is staffed and hosted. We scope all of it in discovery before a line of code is written.

08 Why us

Why choose us?

01
We've seen your problem before
Across dozens of industries, we recognise your situation fast, then frame the fix around your margin and your operations, not a generic template.
02
We own the number, not the ticket
We measure success the way you do: hours saved, revenue earned, margin recovered. We stay through launch and growth, so the result is ours to own.
03
Serious businesses trust us
Vodafone, T-Mobile, Cisco, Energia, Aldi, Nike. Building since 2015. Serious businesses keep coming back because we stay accountable long after launch.

09 Questions

Common questions

: Security classification requirements are scoped during discovery alongside the functional requirements. The classification level of the data the system will handle determines the security architecture, the access control model, the data residency requirements, the encryption standards, the audit trail depth, and the network segregation needed. We build to the security framework specified by your organisation's security authority rather than a generic commercial standard. For projects with classified data requirements, the security architecture is documented and reviewed before development starts.
: ITAR shapes who can sit on the team, where the code and data are hosted, and how access is recorded. If your programme touches ITAR or EAR controlled technical data, we scope the staffing, hosting, and access controls in discovery before a line of code is written. Clearance is a hard constraint, not a footnote.
: For US contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information, NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC Level 2 set the control baseline. That assessment is far easier to pass when the controls are designed into the architecture from the first sprint, not retrofitted before an audit. The compliance burden falls hardest on small contractors, which is exactly why the controls belong in the architecture, not in a remediation project.
: Yes. Defence organisations commonly operate legacy systems that cannot be replaced but need to share data with modern applications. We integrate through the interfaces they expose: file-based exchange, database-level integration, SOAP web services, or proprietary protocols. We assess each legacy integration during discovery so the achievable data flows are confirmed before development starts. Where a legacy system provides no integration interface, we discuss the options before committing to an approach.
: We work within the procurement framework applicable to the contract, whether that is direct negotiation with a prime contractor, work through a government panel arrangement, or a competitive tender. We produce the documentation the procurement process requires: requirement specifications, design documentation, test evidence, and acceptance criteria. For contracts requiring formal acceptance testing, we structure the test approach to satisfy the acceptance standard before development starts.
: Defence programmes run larger than commercial builds because of the documentation, security architecture, and integration burden. A focused first capability costs less than a full platform with training simulation, personnel management, and secure data architecture. We scope the programme in discovery and agree a fixed cost before development starts, with milestone-based payment against defined deliverables.

Defence software by product

Get a build-vs-buy plan for your defence programme.

Tell us your programme, your security classification requirements, and the operational problems your current systems don't solve. We'll scope the right system within your constraints.

Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
All conversations are NDA-protected.

Your name

Your work email

Please enter a valid email address.

Your phone number