AI for real estate companies that acts on the data you already hold.

An automated valuation model estimates property value using a regression or gradient boosting model trained on comparable sales data. The model learns the relationship between property attributes and sale price from historical transactions: location, property type, square footage, bedroom and bathroom count, age, condition signals, and proximity to amenity and transport points. At inference, you pass in the property attributes and the model produces a value estimate with a confidence interval. The confidence interval is important: an AVM with a narrow confidence interval for a high-volume, homogeneous property type like urban apartments may be reliable enough to use for initial valuation or portfolio tracking. For heterogeneous properties in markets with thin transaction volumes, the confidence interval widens and the AVM is better used as a starting point for human review rather than a standalone decision. We train AVMs on your local market transaction data combined with public data sources. Accuracy is validated against a holdout set of recent sales before deployment. Most AVMs we build achieve median absolute percentage error of 3-8% for the property types and geographies with sufficient training data.

AI lead scoring in real estate builds a classification model trained on your historical inquiry data: leads that converted to viewings, and viewings that converted to offers or lettings, versus leads that went cold. The model learns which combinations of signals correlate with conversion: inquiry source, property type and price range relative to stated budget, engagement behavior on your listings (time on page, number of properties viewed, saved searches), time from first inquiry to response, and prior interaction history. Each new inquiry is scored at intake. High-score leads surface to your agents immediately. Low-score leads enter a nurture sequence rather than consuming agent call time. The result is your agents spend their time on the leads most likely to convert, and response time for high-intent inquiries drops because the model identifies them ahead of the queue. For lead scoring to work well, you need enough historical conversion data: typically 6-12 months of inquiries with known outcomes. We assess data availability in discovery.

AI document extraction for real estate leases and contracts extracts the key structured data fields from unstructured document text: tenant name, landlord name, property address, lease start and end date, break clauses and notice periods, rent amount and review schedule, rent review mechanism and CPI cap, permitted use, service charge cap, dilapidations provisions, assignment and subletting rights, and any special conditions. Once extracted, this data is searchable, reportable, and exportable: you can query which leases expire in the next 6 months, which have uncapped rent reviews, which have break clauses approaching. For property managers and commercial landlords managing large lease portfolios, this replaces the process of reading each document manually every time a data point is needed. We build extraction pipelines against your specific lease types and document formats. Accuracy is validated before deployment across the document variation in your portfolio.

Rental price optimization models recommend asking prices that balance time-to-let against rental income. The model is trained on market data: what similar properties in comparable locations listed at, how long they took to let, and at what rent they ultimately transacted. It incorporates current demand signals: inquiry volume for similar properties, current vacancy rates in the area, and seasonal patterns. At listing, the model recommends a price range: a higher end that maximizes income if demand supports it and a lower end that minimizes vacancy if the market is softer. The model also recommends when to adjust price if a property is not generating inquiries after a set period. This is different from a static comparable analysis because it responds to current market conditions rather than historical asking prices. For landlords and agents managing large portfolios, price optimization reduces average days-to-let while maintaining or improving total rental income. We train these models on local market data combined with your historical listing and transaction data.

Cost depends on the scope: a focused lead scoring model or lease extraction pipeline typically runs between $25,000 and $60,000. A full automated valuation model with explainability output and CRM integration sits in the $60,000 to $120,000 range. We scope every project in week 1 and lock the price before development starts, so there are no surprises on the final invoice. Request a 30-minute call and we will give you a ballpark figure based on your specific workflow.

Research from Harvard Business Review shows leads contacted within 5 minutes of inquiry are roughly 100 times more likely to connect than leads contacted after 30 minutes, and real estate inquiries are typically answered the next business day, 14 to 18 hours later. A voice AI agent calls a new lead within 60 to 90 seconds of submission regardless of time of day, asks qualification questions, and books a showing directly against your calendar, so leads no longer have time to book with a competing agency before first contact.

Yes. We sign mutual NDAs before any discovery conversation where you share internal data, transaction history, or proprietary processes. Our standard NDA covers confidentiality of all project materials, data, and deliverables. We work with residential agencies, commercial landlords, and property management platforms across the US, UK, Europe, Canada, GCC, South Africa, and Southeast Asia where data privacy obligations are strict.