
Purpose Built EdTech LMS SaaS Platform Disrupting African K-12 Schools
- 4000+
- 25%
- 16 weeks
Custom grant management software for grant-seeking nonprofits managing a complex portfolio of institutional funders, and for grant-making foundations who need an application portal, review workflow, and grantee compliance tracking built around their specific programme design.
Spreadsheet-based grant tracking works up to a point. When your grant portfolio spans 50 active grants with different reporting schedules, or your foundation processes 500 applications per cycle through a multi-stage review, the spreadsheet breaks down and compliance risk grows with it.
Grant calendar with deadlines, letter of inquiry tracking, application records, and compliance schedules
Restricted grant budget tracking with expenditure posting and variance reporting for finance and programme staff
Foundation application portal with multi-stage review, scoring, and award letter generation
Grantee compliance portal with report submission, review, and payment release tracking
Recognition
Grant reporting deadlines managed in a shared calendar with supporting documents assembled from multiple folders the week before each submission, rather than tracked automatically from the award date with documents organised by grant?
Foundation receiving hundreds of applications by email PDF that reviewers score in separate spreadsheets, with no way to compare applications, track review completion, or produce a consistent decision record?
In short
RaftLabs builds custom grant management software for both grant-seeking nonprofits and grant-making foundations. For grant-seekers, the platform covers a grant calendar with deadlines, letter of inquiry tracking, application records, award notices, and grant period compliance deadlines. For foundations, it covers an online application portal, internal review and scoring, award letter generation, grantee reporting requirements, and multi-year payment scheduling. Most projects deliver in 12 to 16 weeks at a fixed cost.
Companies we've built for


Grant management at scale involves two different problems depending on which side of the grant relationship you occupy. For grant-seeking nonprofits, the problem is visibility across a complex portfolio of institutional funders with different reporting schedules, different budget templates, and different compliance expectations. Each grant sits in a separate folder with its own deadline calendar that nobody maintains consistently. For grant-making foundations, the problem is application volume: processing hundreds or thousands of applications through a multi-stage review with consistent scoring and a defensible decision record can't be done well through email and spreadsheets.
We build grant management software for both sides of this relationship. We've built application management platforms, review workflows, and compliance tracking systems for complex multi-stakeholder processes. We understand the specific data requirements of grant management, for both the grant writer submitting to funders and the programme officer reviewing applications.
Grant pipeline for grant-seeking organisations tracks every active funder relationship from prospecting through to close: letter of inquiry deadline, application deadline, decision date, grant period start and end, and all reporting deadlines for the full grant period. Grant status dashboard shows the number of active grants, total awarded, total pending, and upcoming reporting deadlines within the next 30, 60, and 90 days. Alert notifications go to the grants manager and programme director as deadlines approach, with escalation to senior leadership for high-value grants approaching a reporting deadline without a completed draft. Historical grant record for every funder relationship holds the application history, the award amounts, the reporting submissions, and any funder communications stored against the funder record.
Restricted grant budget management for each active grant shows the approved budget by category, expenditures posted against each budget line as costs are incurred, and the remaining balance visible to programme and finance staff at any point during the grant period. Expenditure posting from the finance system via integration or manual entry allocates costs to the correct grant based on the account coding used in the financial system. Budget modification tracking documents funder-approved moves between budget categories against the grant record and updates the revised budget. Variance report generation for interim and final grant reports shows approved budget versus actual expenditure by category in the format required by the funder. Indirect cost recovery tracking handles grants where the funder allows an overhead or indirect cost rate, with the indirect cost calculated and recorded as part of the grant budget management.
Online application portal for grant applicants with configurable application forms by grant programme: different programmes have different eligibility questions, narrative sections, and document upload requirements. Two-stage application process manages a letter of inquiry before inviting full proposals, LOI submission, review, and invitation to full proposal within the platform, with applicant status notifications at each stage. Eligibility pre-screening filters out ineligible applications before reviewer time is consumed on them. Applicant organisation profile with registered charity number, financial data, and previous grant history is accessible to reviewers without requiring applicants to resubmit the same information for every grant programme. Application deadline management closes automatically at the configured deadline and acknowledges receipt to every applicant.
Internal review workflow assigns applications to reviewers based on programme area, geography, or rotation rules. Scoring rubric is configured per grant programme with the criteria and weighting that reflect the foundation's grant-making priorities. Reviewer scoring is completed within the platform with scores and written comments stored against the application and visible to the programme officer and grants committee. Conflict of interest declaration requires each reviewer to declare per application, with flagged applications excluded from that reviewer's queue and the conflict documented for the decision record. Committee meeting preparation compiles application summaries, aggregated scores, and reviewer comments into a committee pack without manual assembly. Decision recording captures the grant award amount, conditions, and any declination notes against the application for the foundation's decision record.
Grantee portal where awarded organisations submit progress reports, financial reports, and supporting documents for each grant requirement. Report templates are configured per grant programme with the narrative sections, financial reporting format, and document requirements the foundation needs for compliance review. Submission deadline tracking sends automated reminders to grantees as reporting deadlines approach, and overdue report flags alert foundation staff when a grantee has missed a deadline. Foundation staff review submitted reports within the portal with review comments, approval, and any follow-up requests documented against the submission. Payment release ties to report approval for foundations where grant payments are conditional on satisfactory reporting: the next payment isn't released until the required report has been reviewed and approved.
Multi-year grant management records the full award commitment at the point of award and schedules individual payment tranches across the grant period. Payment schedule tracking records each tranche's scheduled date, amount, conditions, and actual payment date, with total committed versus paid visible to the foundation's finance team for cash flow planning. Conditional payment releases flag tranches conditional on a specific milestone or report submission in the payment schedule, with the release trigger configured in the review workflow. Portfolio reporting for foundations with large multi-year grant commitments shows total outstanding commitment across all active multi-year grants, payments due in the current fiscal year, and projected payments in future years for board and investment committee planning. Grant closure workflow archives the grant record and preserves the funder-grantee relationship history when the final payment has been made and the final report received.
Yes. Some organisations both seek grants from funders and make grants to other organisations or individuals: community foundations, federated funds, and some larger operating charities with a grant-making programme. The system supports both functions simultaneously. The grant-seeking module tracks the organisation's own applications to external funders, while the grant-making module manages the application portal, review workflow, and grantee compliance for the organisation's own grant programme. Access control means staff working on the grant-seeking side see only their module, and grant-making programme staff see only the grant-making module, while the grants director or CEO can see both.
Eligibility screening is configured per grant programme based on the criteria the foundation uses: organisation type, geographic focus, programme area, budget size, or previous grant history with the foundation. The pre-screening questions are presented at the start of the application before the applicant completes the full form. If an applicant's answers indicate ineligibility, the application is declined at the screening stage with a notification explaining why, and the ineligible application isn't forwarded to reviewers. For programmes with borderline eligibility questions that require human judgement, the pre-screening flags the application for programme officer review rather than automatically declining it. Eligibility criteria are configurable without development support so the foundation's staff can adjust them as grant programme parameters change.
Yes. Integration with the finance system is important for restricted grant budget tracking: expenditures coded to grant-specific account codes in the accounting system need to flow into the grant budget tracking module without manual data entry. We integrate with Xero, Sage Intacct, QuickBooks, and mid-market ERP systems via API or file-based exchange depending on the system's integration capability. The integration maps account codes in the financial system to grant budget categories in the grant management platform, so costs are allocated to the correct grant and budget line automatically as accounting entries are posted. The integration architecture is agreed with your finance and IT team during discovery.
A grant management platform for grant-seeking organisations covering a grant calendar, pipeline management, restricted budget tracking, and reporting deadline management typically runs $30,000 to $55,000. A foundation application portal with review workflow, scoring, committee preparation, and grantee compliance reporting typically runs $50,000 to $90,000. A full platform covering both grant-seeking and grant-making functions, multi-year payment management, and finance system integration typically runs $80,000 to $140,000. We price every project at a fixed cost agreed before development starts.
What clients say
Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

RaftLabs has been an exceptional partner. From the start, they became more than just a service provider, they embraced our vision with their expertise and dedication.
01 / 02
Tell us whether you're managing grants as a funder, a recipient, or both, the number of active grants, the reporting schedule, and the compliance gaps in your current process.