• Managing 50+ artists across spreadsheets, shared folders, and email threads with no audit trail?

  • Tour bookings, contracts, and advance recoupment tracked in separate tools that don't connect?

Artist Management Software Development

Managing 50 or more artists across spreadsheets, shared folders, and email threads means nothing has an audit trail. Deals are tracked in one place, contracts in another, tour dates in a calendar no one else can see, and advance balances in a spreadsheet that was last updated two quarters ago.

We build custom artist management platforms that put artist CRM, contract tracking, tour scheduling, royalty split configuration, and label-to-artist reporting in a single system. Every deal, payment, and event is connected to the artist record it belongs to.

  • Artist CRM with deal and contract tracking

  • Royalty split configuration and advance recoupment tracking

  • Tour and booking schedule management

  • Label-to-artist reporting and payment dashboards

Artist management software is a purpose-built platform for managing artist relationships, deal pipelines, contracts, tour schedules, and royalty splits in one place. Generic CRMs lack the music-industry data model needed to track advance recoupment, split configurations, and label-to-artist payment flows. RaftLabs builds custom artist management software that fits how labels, management companies, and booking agencies actually work, typically delivering in 10 to 14 weeks at a fixed cost.

Vodafone
Aldi
Nike
Microsoft
Heineken
Cisco
Calorgas
Energia Rewards
GE
Bank of America
T-Mobile
Valero
Techstars
East Ventures
Software products shipped
100+
Cost delivery
Fixed
Week delivery cycles
10-14
Industries served
24+

What artist management software needs to do

A generic CRM tracks contacts and deals. Artist management requires a different data model entirely. An artist record needs to carry contracts, split sheets, advance balances, tour dates, booking confirmations, royalty history, and label relationships -- all connected, all auditable.

When those data points live in separate tools, the management team spends its time reconciling information rather than working deals. Advance recoupment is calculated manually each quarter. Tour logistics are coordinated over email. Contracts are stored in folders with no link to the deal or the payment that followed from them.

We build artist management platforms for labels, management companies, and booking agencies. The system is built around how you actually manage artists -- not how a generic CRM vendor imagined a music business might work. Deal pipelines, contract versions, split configurations, and advance tracking are core data objects, not custom fields bolted onto a contact record.

What we build

Artist CRM and deal pipeline

A CRM built around the artist relationship, not a generic contact record. Each artist profile carries active and historical deals, assigned team members, label relationships, document history, and social media analytics from Spotify for Artists, Apple Music for Artists, and Chartmetric API -- so the commercial context and the streaming performance data live in the same place rather than requiring a separate dashboard check. Deal pipelines track opportunity stage, deal terms, contract status, deal category (recording, publishing, sync, merchandise, brand partnership), and responsible party.

Managers see every active deal across their roster on one screen with filtering by deal stage, deal type, and contract expiry window. Labels see their full artist portfolio with deal status, key contractual dates, advance balances, and recoupment positions. Social media analytics aggregation pulls follower counts, monthly listener data, streaming performance, and playlist placements from multiple DSP and analytics APIs into the artist record so the team has a current picture of commercial traction alongside the deal data. Nothing falls through the cracks because a deal was tracked in someone's inbox instead of the system.

Contract and rights management

Contract records linked directly to the artist and deal they belong to. Upload signed agreements, track key dates (term start, term end, option exercise windows, delivery deadlines, exclusivity periods), and log amendments with version history so you can see the full history of a contract's evolution without hunting through email threads. Rights granted under each contract -- master recording rights, publishing rights, sync licensing rights, merchandise rights, touring rights -- are recorded against the contract so ownership is clear and auditable when a downstream sync licensing request, sample clearance, or sub-licensing opportunity comes in.

Deal terms tracking records advance amounts, royalty rates, territory scope, and reversion clauses against each contract so the commercial terms are queryable, not buried in a PDF. Automated alerts fire at configurable lead times before option exercise windows, delivery deadlines, and contract expiry dates so nothing lapses without a deliberate decision. Sync licensing deal management tracks incoming sync requests, licensed uses (TV, film, advertising, games), license fees, and usage term dates against the master recording and publishing rights records. Where a sync deal requires co-writer sign-off, the system tracks approval status from each rights holder before the license is issued.

Advance and recoupment tracking

Advance balances tracked from the moment funds are issued, linked to the contract and the specific royalty accounts they recoup against. Most recording contracts specify which royalty income streams recoup against the advance -- typically record sales royalties but not mechanical royalties or sync fees -- and the system enforces this accounting logic automatically. As royalties are earned and ingested from digital distribution statements (DistroKid, TuneCore, CD Baby, or direct DSP exports), the system applies them against the outstanding advance balance per the contractual recoupment rate and shows the current recoupment position.

Mechanical royalty income from Harry Fox Agency (HFA), Music Reports, or NMPA-affiliated licensing organisations is tracked separately from performance royalty income from PROs (ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC for US performance rights; PRS for Music, SOCAN, and equivalent societies for international performance rights). Labels and managers see unrecouped balances and current recoupment velocity across the full roster without running manual calculations. Artists can see their own recoupment position through a dedicated portal view if you choose to expose it. Royalty statement generation produces periodic statements per artist showing earnings by income stream, recoupment applied, net payable amount, and statement period -- replacing the manually assembled spreadsheet that currently takes days to produce at quarter end.

Tour and booking management

Tour schedules built inside the artist record rather than in a shared calendar that has no link to the artist's other data. Each booking carries venue, promoter contact, deal terms (guarantee, percentage split, ticket scaling), support act lineup, production rider requirements, hospitality rider costs, and travel logistics. Routing views show the full tour leg on a map with driving and flight distances between dates so routing gaps that create unnecessary travel costs are flagged before itineraries are confirmed with promoters.

Booking status tracks from offer through hold, confirmation, signed contract, and settlement so the booking agent, tour manager, and business manager all see the same status without requiring a status call. Tour revenue tracking records concert ticket sales revenue (against the deal terms guarantee or percentage), merchandise revenue per show, and hospitality rider cost allocation across the tour period. Settlement reconciliation compares projected deal terms against actual settlement statements from each promoter to flag discrepancies. Digital distribution statement reconciliation ingests statements from DistroKid, TuneCore, or CD Baby APIs alongside the touring revenue records so total artist earnings across touring and recorded music are visible in the same reporting view.

Royalty split and payment configuration

Split sheets stored as live data, not static PDF documents. Each split is linked to the recording (ISRC-identified) or composition (ISWC-identified) it governs and to the royalty accounts that will receive distributions. Co-writer percentages for both writer's share (paid by PROs) and publisher's share are tracked separately because they flow through different collection channels. Mechanical royalty splits for reproductions (digital downloads, streaming mechanicals, physical) are tracked per the licensing terms with Harry Fox, Music Reports, or direct digital licensing arrangements.

When a royalty payment comes in from any source -- ASCAP/BMI/SESAC quarterly distributions, HFA mechanical payments, distribution platform payments -- the system calculates each participant's share based on the current split configuration for that recording or composition and queues the payment amounts. Split amendments are versioned so the system can apply the correct split to each historical payment period without reprocessing prior distributions. Collaborators with different splits across different tracks on the same album -- common when features or co-writes were negotiated track by track -- are handled without manual allocation at payment time. The payment queue produces a disbursement file showing each payee, amount, and source income stream for the business manager or accountant to process.

Artist and label reporting portal

Reporting dashboards for label executives, managers, and artists, each scoped to the data they need access to. Label executive views show roster-wide performance: advances outstanding by artist, recoupment positions and velocity, deal pipeline value by stage, upcoming option windows, and income by revenue stream across all artists. Manager views show their specific roster with tour revenue by show, deal activity by stage, royalty earnings by income type, and advance recoupment status. These views replace the quarterly manual spreadsheet with a live data view that's always current.

Artist portals give artists visibility into their own earnings, advance balance, recoupment position, upcoming payment amounts and timing, and streaming analytics pulled from Spotify for Artists and Apple Music for Artists APIs -- without requiring a call to the label or management company. Chartmetric API integration aggregates streaming performance, chart positions, playlist placements, and social media metrics into the artist portal so artists can see their commercial traction alongside their financial data. Royalty statements export to PDF for formal quarterly and annual distributions to artists and co-writers. Digital distribution statement reconciliation pulls raw statements from DistroKid, TuneCore, or CD Baby and reconciles them against the system's calculated royalty positions, flagging discrepancies before they become payment disputes.

Frequently asked questions

A general-purpose CRM tracks contacts and deals, but it doesn't have the data model that artist management requires. Advance recoupment linked to a specific royalty account type, split sheet configurations with co-writer percentages tracked at the recording level, contract option windows with automated alerts, PRO royalty income distinguished from mechanical royalty income, ISRC and ISWC identifiers on recordings and compositions, and tour settlement reconciliation against deal terms -- none of these are standard Salesforce or HubSpot objects.

You can bolt custom fields onto Salesforce to approximate some of this, but the result is fragile: each custom object relationship requires maintenance, the reporting logic becomes a tangled formula because the data model was never intended for these relationships, and new staff can't work in it without training on your custom configuration. HubSpot's custom objects have similar limitations for a data model this domain-specific. A purpose-built system has the artist, recording, composition, royalty account, split sheet, advance, and tour booking as first-class data objects connected the way a music business actually works. The workflows, automation, and reporting work without workarounds because the underlying data model is correct.

Split complexity varies by how your deals are structured, not by roster size alone. A label with standard deal templates -- say, an 18% all-in royalty rate applied across the roster with a consistent recoupment structure -- is simpler to configure than a management company where every artist has individually negotiated splits on every release and every feature track.

The platform handles both. Splits are stored at the recording level (keyed to ISRC) so an artist can have different splits on tracks from different albums, different deals, or different co-write arrangements. A track with three co-writers who each negotiated different participation percentages is tracked at the individual co-writer level with each person's writer's share and publisher's share recorded separately. When mechanical royalties arrive from Harry Fox or Music Reports, and performance royalties arrive from ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC, the system applies the correct split for each income type -- which may differ depending on how the publishing rights were split. At 50 artists with multiple releases each, the number of split configurations can run into the hundreds. Scale is handled by the system architecture, not by adding staff to run calculations.

Yes. Multi-entity architecture is a standard requirement for groups that manage multiple labels, operate a management division alongside a label division, or handle publishing administration separately from the recording rights business. Each entity has its own roster, deal pipeline, royalty accounts, advance ledgers, and reporting views. Data is not shared across entities unless a specific cross-entity relationship exists -- an artist signed to one label but managed by an affiliated management company is the typical example.

Staff access is role-based and entity-scoped: an A&R manager at one label sees that label's roster and pipeline but not the other label's deals. A business manager handling royalty accounting for both labels has cross-entity read access to the royalty and advance records. A group executive sees consolidated reporting across all entities -- total advances outstanding, aggregate recoupment positions, combined deal pipeline value -- while also being able to drill into any individual entity. Access control configuration is part of the setup process, not a post-launch customisation. Royalty statement reconciliation for distribution statements from DistroKid, TuneCore, or CD Baby is handled per entity because each entity typically has separate distribution accounts and payment recipients.

A focused artist CRM with deal tracking, contract management, key date alerts, and basic label-to-artist reporting runs from $15,000 to $35,000. This covers the core deal management and contract administration workflows without royalty accounting or distribution integration.

A full artist management platform with advance recoupment tracking linked to specific royalty account types, split sheet management with co-writer percentage tracking at the ISRC level, mechanical royalty ingestion from Harry Fox/Music Reports, performance royalty tracking from ASCAP/BMI/SESAC distributions, quarterly royalty statement generation, tour and booking management with settlement reconciliation, digital distribution statement reconciliation from DistroKid/TuneCore/CD Baby APIs, social media analytics aggregation from Spotify for Artists and Chartmetric, and label-to-artist reporting portals runs from $30,000 to $80,000 depending on roster size, the number of distribution and PRO integrations, and the complexity of your deal structures. We scope projects in detail before quoting so the cost reflects your actual requirements.

What clients say

What our clients say

Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.

Dr. J. Ayo Akinyele
Dr. J. Ayo Akinyele
USA
President, Co-Founder

I was pleased with RaftLabs team quality, consistency and execution.

01 / 02

Related services

  • Custom Software Development -- Custom music streaming platforms, distribution pipelines, royalty management systems, and artist tools
  • AI Agent Development -- Autonomous agents for rights detection, royalty anomaly flagging, and content recommendation
  • Business Process Automation -- Automate DSP delivery workflows, royalty ingestion, split sheet processing, and payment disbursement

Talk to us about your artist management project.

Tell us about your roster size, your current tools, and where the process breaks down. We will scope a system built around how your team actually works.