"I definitely recommend RaftLabs, especially to founders building complex platforms. They were transparent throughout the whole project."
Gil Nugraha
Founder at UrShipper
Procurement Software
When email purchase orders and manual invoice matching stop working
Most businesses start their procurement process in email: a department head sends a request, procurement raises an order, the supplier delivers, an invoice arrives, and finance pays it. For low volume this works. The process breaks down as volume grows: purchase orders get raised after the goods arrive, approvals get skipped, invoices don't match the PO because nothing was updated during the order process, and month-end is spent reconciling committed spend that no one had reliable visibility into. We build procurement systems for businesses that have outgrown email-based purchasing and need a process that enforces the right approvals, creates an accurate audit trail, and produces spend data the finance and operations team can act on.
PO creation from a supplier catalogue or free-text requisition with automated routing to the right approver based on value, category, and cost centre
Approval workflows with conditional routing reflecting your authority matrix: value thresholds, budget holder sign-off, and finance approval configured to your policy
Three-way matching of purchase order, goods receipt, and invoice with automatic approval for matched invoices and exception routing for discrepancies
Spend analytics showing committed and actual spend by category, supplier, cost centre, and period against budget
Bring the problem, the current workflow, or the existing code. We reply with a practical next step within one business day.
Trusted by
The brief
Start with what is not working.
Good software decisions begin with the constraint, not a list of features or a preferred technology.
01
Purchase orders raised by email or over the phone because the ERP purchasing module is too slow and too rigid for the way the business actually buys?
02
Invoices sitting in a queue for weeks because the three-way match fails and no one can see where the discrepancy is or who needs to resolve it?
Plain answer
RaftLabs builds custom procurement software for operations and finance teams: PO automation, approval workflows matched to your authority matrix, three-way matching, and spend analytics in one connected system.
What to remember
- Approval routing reflects your actual authority matrix, value thresholds, category ownership, and CFO sign-off, with parallel approval and delegation for approvers on leave.
- Three-way matching auto-approves invoices within tolerance and routes discrepancies with the specific quantity, price, or missing-receipt issue clearly presented for resolution.
- Spend analytics distinguish committed spend (approved, not yet invoiced) from actual spend, giving finance real-time budget visibility instead of a month-end surprise.
Proof
- shipping production software for operations and finance teams
- Since 2015
- RaftLabs delivery record
- average client rating across delivered projects
- 4.9/5
- Clutch, verified reviews
- scope and cost agreed in writing before any development starts
- Fixed price
- Every RaftLabs engagement
When email purchase orders and manual invoice matching stop working
We build procurement systems that enforce the right approvals and create an accurate audit trail. The result is spend data your finance and operations team can act on. Process design is agreed during discovery, before any development starts.
Capabilities
What we build
PO automation and requisition management
Catalogue or free-text requisitions converting to POs automatically, with blanket order support for recurring purchases.
Approval workflows and authority matrix
Value- and category-based routing with parallel approval, delegation for absences, and a complete approval audit trail.
Three-way matching
Automatic approval within tolerance, with clear discrepancy presentation and a documented resolution workflow. Exceptions route to the right person with the quantity, price, or missing-receipt issue already identified.
Spend analytics
Committed-vs-actual spend by category, supplier, and cost centre, with budget variance flagged before month-end. Finance sees the full commitment picture in real time instead of discovering it during reconciliation.
Category management
Category ownership, preferred-supplier designation, and savings tracking tied to sourcing strategy documentation.
Supplier catalogue
Team-maintained approved items and prices with validity periods and multi-supplier listings for buyer choice. The procurement team keeps prices current without developer involvement.
Where the money leaks in a manual procure-to-pay process
Manual accounts-payable is expensive per transaction. The gap is not the software licence but the time your finance team spends chasing approvals, keying data, and resolving exceptions a match rule could have caught.
The table below maps each procure-to-pay stage to where manual work costs you and what an automated workflow changes. Use it to locate your own biggest leak before you scope a build.
| Procure-to-pay stage | What goes wrong manually | What automation changes | Where the saving comes from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requisition and PO | Orders raised by email after goods arrive, with no commitment recorded | Catalogue or free-text requisition routes for approval before the order is placed | Fewer maverick buys, duplicate orders, and off-contract spend |
| Approval | Sign-offs skipped, or stuck in an inbox for days | Conditional routing on value, category, and cost centre, with delegation for absences | Shorter cycle time and policy enforced on every order |
| Goods receipt and matching | Invoices matched by hand, exceptions found late in the month | Three-way match auto-approves within tolerance and routes only real discrepancies | Lower cost per invoice and fewer late-payment penalties |
| Spend visibility | Committed spend invisible until the month-end reconciliation | Committed vs actual spend by category, supplier, and cost centre in real time | Budget control and compliance with negotiated supplier rates |
How we work
From scope to live procurement system
- Step 0101
Purchasing process scoping
We map how your business manages purchasing today: the volume of orders, the approval process, and where the current approach creates problems. You leave scoping with a written scope document and a fixed-price quote.
- Step 0202
Authority matrix and matching rules design
Approval routing, matching tolerances, and ERP integration designed against your actual purchasing policy.
- Step 0303
Build and integrate
Requisitions, approvals, and three-way matching built in parallel, tested against real purchasing scenarios.
- Step 0404
Parallel run and launch
The system runs alongside the existing process before full cutover, with the procurement team trained on catalogue admin.
Why us
Why operations and finance teams choose RaftLabs
- 01
The engineers who scope also build
The engineers who assess your authority matrix also build the solution. No bait-and-switch, no offshore handoff after the contract is signed.
- 02
Fixed price before development starts
We scope the work, calculate the cost, and lock it in writing before any development starts.
- 03
Shipping production software since 2015
Real engagements across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and logistics, not every one published as a named case study. Relationships, not vertical claims.
- 04
Built for audit and segregation of duties
Every requisition, approval, and match is logged with who did what and when. Approval routing enforces segregation of duties, so the person who raises an order cannot approve it, the control auditors check under SOX.
- 05
We'll tell you when your ERP module is enough
Custom is justified by real authority-matrix or catalogue complexity, not recommended by default.
- 06
Adoption designed in, not assumed
A faster requisition experience and a parallel-run period address the real risk in any procurement rollout.
What we plan around
Most procurement rollouts fail on the same few things. Here is where they go wrong and how we design against each one before it happens.
- Users route around the system
- If the requisition flow is slower than email, people bypass it and the data stays incomplete. We build the buyer experience to be faster than the process it replaces, then run a parallel period before the old process is switched off.
- Match tolerance set too tight
- Zero-tolerance three-way matching turns every rounding difference into an exception, and the queue never clears. We set tolerances by category with your finance team so real discrepancies surface and noise does not.
- ERP integration left to the end
- Pushing approved POs and matched invoices back to SAP, NetSuite, or Dynamics is where timelines slip. We design that integration early, not after the build is done.
- The catalogue goes stale
- Prices drift and approved suppliers change. We give the procurement team admin tools to maintain the catalogue and price validity without developer involvement.
What clients say
What our clients say
Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.
Testimonial 1 of 1: Gil Nugraha
We have not shipped a public, named procurement platform we can point to yet. The closest reference is adjacent supply-chain work: a multi-carrier shipping platform where the same disciplines apply, structured workflows, exception handling, and integrations that hold up under real transaction volume.
Proof
Adjacent supply-chain work
Scalable Multi-Carrier Shipping Software for a Global Logistics Platform
App like Clubhouse for political networks: how RaftLabs built Voter IQ's live audio rooms, constituency hierarchy, and issue escalation before an election cycle
A Clubhouse-style live audio app for political networks. Constituency-aware groups, issue escalation up the hierarchy, and role-controlled rooms. First release in 16 weeks, tested to handle thousands of people connected at once.
Over 15+ clinics see success by adopting RPM app, PDC with remote care in 2 months
The RPM app improves remote care with 50% faster response times, driving rapid adoption by healthcare providers. It reads health data from wearable health monitoring devices like CGM, BPM, etc., securely storing and sending it to healthcare providers.
Work with us
Have a procurement software project?
Tell us how your business manages purchasing today: the volume of orders, the approval process, and where the current approach creates problems. We'll scope a procurement system built around your actual purchasing operation.
- Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
- Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
- Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
- 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
- All conversations are NDA-protected.
Common questions
Custom is right when your authority matrix is complex enough that the ERP's approval routing can't model it, when you need a catalogue and requisition experience fast enough that users actually adopt it, when your spend analytics go beyond standard ERP reports, or when the exception workflow your team needs doesn't match the module.
Yes. Common integrations include SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, NetSuite, Xero, and QuickBooks, covering pushing approved POs to the ERP, receiving goods receipt confirmations, and pushing matched invoices to the payment queue.
We build a requisition and approval experience faster than the email process it replaces, and run a parallel period alongside the existing process so issues are resolved before the old process is switched off, plus admin tools so the procurement team manages the catalogue without developer involvement.
Buy the suite when procurement is standard indirect spend. Custom earns its keep when onboarding workflows, multi-entity approvals, or industry compliance rules break the standard mold. Alternatives by fit: Ariba for SAP shops, Ivalua for deep configuration, Zip, Procurify, or Precoro for mid-market procure-to-pay. And compare three-year totals: subscriptions times three plus volume fees, implementation, integration, and internal headcount, not monthly fees.
This is the pass-fail gate. The platform must read open purchase-order lines and write confirmations back; parallel systems get abandoned. Ask before signing: integrated with our exact ERP and version before? Does it require ERP customization? Who owns the integration when we upgrade? If the vendor cannot answer these, the procurement system will become a second place to enter data, and nobody will enter it twice.
Weight adoption above feature depth: a platform requesters avoid produces no data for finance. Run the four-week pilot test: count email purchase requests after four weeks, and check whether approvers can decide from their phone. Dedicated training changes outcomes. If the pilot does not move email requests into the system, the rollout plan is wrong, not the people.
Define the KPIs before buying: invoice exceptions, purchase-order coverage, email-request leakage, approval cycle time. Ask the vendor which KPIs their product moves and how they are measured. An evasive answer is itself the finding. Check the compliance story: segregation of duties (one person cannot raise, approve, and receive), audit-trail immutability, delegated authority recorded and time-bounded. And ask who owns your data and what the exit path looks like.
Go deeper