AI Agents for Insurance
A chatbot tells a policyholder how to file a claim. An AI agent collects the FNOL data, validates it against the policy record, creates the claim in your system, assigns it to the right adjuster, and sends the first status message, all from a single inbound contact. The difference matters in insurance because half-finished workflows create the cost: when a FNOL lands by email and a handler has to open three systems and re-key the data, that's a workflow problem, not a training problem. We build insurance AI agents with a defined scope per workflow, explicit escalation rules, and compliance-aware data handling.
FNOL intake agents that collect, validate, and route first notice of loss from any channel
Underwriting data agents that query CLUE, MVR, credit bureaus, and property databases and return structured output for review
Claims status agents that give policyholders real-time updates without advisor involvement
Compliance-aware architecture with full audit trails and configurable human-in-the-loop checkpoints
Bring the problem, the current workflow, or the existing code. We reply with a practical next step within one business day.
Trusted by
The brief
Good software decisions begin with the constraint, not a list of features or a preferred technology.
Your claims team re-keying the same FNOL data from emails, portals, and phone notes into your system of record, every single intake?
Underwriting data collection from CLUE, MVR, and third-party sources taking days and pulling attention away from actual risk assessment?
Plain answer
RaftLabs builds AI agents for insurance workflows: FNOL intake, underwriting data extraction, claims status, renewal reminders, and fraud-signal flagging. Unlike rule-based RPA, these agents act end-to-end across systems, apply configurable decision logic, and escalate to human reviewers at defined checkpoints. A focused agent launches as a production v1 in 10-14 weeks at fixed cost, then extends to more workflows.
What to remember
Proof
An agent fixes the half-finished-workflow problem by owning it end-to-end. It escalates the exceptions that genuinely need a human. Each agent runs one insurance workflow well. We scope the integration with your policy administration system and claims platform during discovery, where most projects find their real complexity.
McKinsey puts 30 to 40% of an underwriter's time on administrative work like rekeying data and running manual analyses ("Insurance productivity 2030"). That is the work an agent should take off your team.
We are direct about proof. RaftLabs has shipped AI agents and document data-extraction systems, not yet a live insurance claims or underwriting agent. The engineering is the same one domain over. The adjacent work below shows it.
Capabilities
Extracts structured FNOL data from email, portal, or phone transcript, validates against the policy record, creates the claim, and routes it to the right adjuster queue.
Runs parallel CLUE, MVR, credit, and property database retrieval, assembling a structured underwriting package the moment all sources return.
Answers policyholder status enquiries in plain language from live claims data, and sends proactive updates at defined workflow trigger events.
Drives personalised, compliance-checked renewal outreach across the pre-renewal window, escalating coverage questions to a human.
Aggregates configurable fraud indicators into a transparent risk score, routing high-risk claims to SIU with the specific signals that triggered the flag.
Reviews claim narratives at defined lifecycle points to flag recovery-worthy cases for professional review, never determining liability itself.
How we work
We map your target workflow, systems, and where your team is losing time. You leave week 1 with a written scope document and a fixed-price quote.
System integrations, decision logic, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints designed against your compliance requirements.
The agent workflow built as a directed graph with explicit state transitions, tested against real claim and submission scenarios.
Claims and underwriting teams trained on the escalation workflow before the v1 goes live. We extend to more workflows from there.
Why us
The engineers who assess your workflow also build the solution. No bait-and-switch, no offshore handoff after the contract is signed.
We scope the work, calculate the cost, and lock it in writing before any development starts.
We've built AI agents and document data-extraction systems across fintech, healthcare, logistics, and retail. Real engagements across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and logistics, not every one published as a named case study.
The scoping document defines the workflow state machine, integration points, and escalation logic before any code is written.
A data flow diagram, controls inventory, and audit trail specification are delivered alongside the working system.
Proof
Useful next steps
Work with us
Business Broker Software Development
See the serviceTry it yourself
AI Use Case Finder
Find the AI project that pays for itself first.
Open the free tool
Article
OCR vs LLM: How We Built Automated Invoice Scanning
We rebuilt our invoice scanning pipeline using Large Language Models to overcome the limits of traditional OCR. This post shares how we designed a scalable, cost-effective system with Gemini 2.5 Flash, achieving 97% line-item accuracy. Learn how we combined OCR and AI to deliver smarter, automated invoice extraction for high-volume, real-world use cases.
Read more
Article
Top 8 Loyalty Program App Development Companies 2026
Choosing the right loyalty app development company can define your customer retention success. This list features vetted firms for 2026, evaluated on shipped loyalty programs and verified delivery track record. Whether you're a startup or an enterprise, these teams bring the tech and thinking to launch programs that actually deliver.
Read more
Article
Cost to Build an App Like DraftKings: Sportsbook and DFS Build Guide
A DraftKings-style app is three products stacked together: daily fantasy, a real-money sportsbook, and a casino. Here is what each layer actually costs, why licensing dwarfs the software bill, and which operators should build instead of renting a white-label skin.
Read more
Article
AI agents for fintech: Use cases and what they cost
Loan processing, KYC review, fraud triage, trade reconciliation - AI agents handle the high-volume rule-based work that consumes your fintech team. Here's where the ROI is real and what the builds actually cost.
Read moreRPA follows fixed rules on structured data and breaks when formats change. AI agents handle unstructured variation because the LLM reads intent and content, not just field positions. Agents can also take multi-step actions across systems: validate a policy number, create a claim record, route it to the right adjuster, and send acknowledgement as one end-to-end workflow with the full state tracked and auditable.
Every agent action is logged: the data it retrieved, the decision it made, what it wrote to the system of record, and when. That audit trail is what state Departments of Insurance and NAIC model rules on AI systems expect a carrier to produce on request. Standard consumer LLM API terms lack the data processing agreements required for policyholder data, so we confirm DPAs are in place before any policyholder data reaches an LLM. For any output that can decline, delay, or price a policyholder, the agent surfaces the specific reasons and routes to a human, because adverse-action and unfair-claims-practice rules demand an explainable basis, not a black-box score.
We integrate with systems that expose REST APIs or SOAP web services, including Guidewire PolicyCenter and ClaimCenter, Duck Creek Policy and Claims, and Applied Epic. Bureau data including CLUE and MVR is accessed via LexisNexis, ISO, or state-specific aggregators. Integration complexity is the single biggest variable in project scope, so we confirm API access and sandbox environments during discovery.
A focused insurance AI agent covering one workflow, one system integration, defined escalation logic, and compliance-aware architecture typically runs $35,000 to $75,000 and launches as a production v1 in 10-14 weeks, then extends. A multi-agent build covering FNOL intake, underwriting data extraction, and claims status with integrations to a policy admin system and claims platform typically runs $75,000 to $150,000.
Yes. For email, the agent monitors a designated inbox and runs extraction against the email body and attachments. For web portal submissions, it receives a webhook or polls the portal API. For phone transcripts, it extracts FNOL fields from unstructured conversational text. Each channel feeds the same downstream validation and routing workflow, producing a consistent structured claim file.
Work with us
Tell us the workflow you want to automate, the systems you run on, and where your team is losing time to work an agent should handle. We'll scope what it takes and give you a fixed cost.
Go deeper
