Fintech SaaS Development

Fintech SaaS development with compliance built into the schema.

Financial services software has compliance requirements that most generic SaaS infrastructure is not designed to meet. Audit trails for financial regulation, KYC/KYB workflow, PCI-DSS handling, and open banking integration are not features you add later. They are architectural decisions that shape the data model, the tenant isolation strategy, and the vendor selection from the start.
RaftLabs builds multi-tenant SaaS platforms for fintech companies, financial software vendors, and B2B fintech startups where financial compliance and security are built into the schema, not retrofitted before the first enterprise customer signs.

  • Financial compliance built into the architecture from day one, not added before enterprise customers ask for it

  • Multi-tenant SaaS with audit trails designed for financial regulation and SOC 2 readiness

  • Open banking integration via Plaid and TrueLayer, KYC/KYB workflow, PCI-DSS data handling

  • Subscription and usage-based billing via Stripe with tenant-level plan management

  • API-first architecture for the integrations that follow enterprise fintech deals

  • Fixed price, with a validated v1 live in 12-14 weeks, then grow the platform from there

4.8 Google Play rating Mobile POS SaaS

Bring the problem, the current workflow, or the existing code. We reply with a practical next step within one business day.

Trusted by

Perceptional logo
Musgrave Group
UrShipper logo
Brux Dental Solutions
Bella Skin Institute Logo
Energia Rewards
Draftly logo
TuneClub Logo
Sekou LMS logo
Logo of food order management app gula
SnelwegDeals
Grubly logo
PSi logo
Instantor Rewards logo
logo of Mobile app for events, membership clubs, and communities
AldiFest retail campaign logo
logo of Online Video Maker Platform
EMS Connect logo
Worx Squad logo
logo of Online Web App For Making Intro
logo of Referral and Viral Marketing Platform
Concurrences logo
Bank of America logo
Nike logo
Microsoft logo
Cisco logo
Wells Fargo logo
GE logo
Jimmy Choo logo
T-Mobile logo
Iconmobile logo
Vodafone logo
University of Southern California (USC) logo

The brief

Start with what is not working.

Good software decisions begin with the constraint, not a list of features or a preferred technology.

01

B2B fintech startup with a working prototype and a first enterprise customer who needs SOC 2 and multi-tenancy before signing?

02

Financial software company running a single-tenant product that needs to serve 500 clients without a separate deployment per customer?

03

Payments company building a SaaS merchant dashboard and discovering PCI-DSS scope after the architecture is already set?

Plain answer

RaftLabs builds multi-tenant SaaS platforms for fintech companies and B2B financial software vendors. Capabilities include financial audit trails, KYC/KYB workflow, PCI-DSS data handling, open banking via Plaid and TrueLayer, and subscription billing. Financial compliance is built into the schema from day one. A fixed-price v1 starts at $65,000 and launches in 12-14 weeks, then grows as tenants and integrations are added.

What to remember

  • RaftLabs builds multi-tenant fintech SaaS platforms with financial compliance built into the schema from day one, not retrofitted later
  • A fixed-price v1 launches in 12-14 weeks, then the platform grows as tenants and integrations are added
  • Open banking integrations supported include Plaid, TrueLayer, and MX for account aggregation, payment initiation, and income verification
  • KYC and KYB workflow is tenant-configurable with verification status written to the audit trail
  • A v1 first phase starts at $65,000 to $110,000; the full platform grows to $110,000 to $175,000 as mobile apps, KYC/KYB, and more integrations are added
  • SOC 2 readiness and PCI-DSS scope are architectural decisions designed in from week one, not added before the first enterprise customer asks

The deal was ready to sign. Then the security questionnaire arrived.

A B2B fintech startup had a working prototype and its first enterprise customer ready to sign. Then procurement sent the security questionnaire: SOC 2, multi-tenant data isolation, and an audit trail covering every balance update, permission change, and login. None of it was in the prototype.

Retrofitting compliance onto a single-tenant product means rebuilding the data model, the tenant isolation, and the vendor choices that were locked in months ago. The build that should have taken weeks becomes a rewrite, and the enterprise deal waits on it.

Compliance is not a feature you add before the first enterprise customer asks. It is the schema you start with.

According to IBM's 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report, financial industry data breaches cost an average of $6.08 million per incident, the second-highest of any sector. For fintech SaaS platforms, the risk is architectural: platforms that reach production without compliance controls embedded in the data model face breach costs that dwarf the cost of building it right the first time.

RaftLabs builds multi-tenant SaaS platforms for fintech companies, financial software vendors, and B2B fintech startups, with financial compliance built into the schema, not retrofitted before the first enterprise customer signs. We have shipped products in production across fintech, healthcare, hospitality, and logistics, and are rated 4.9/5 by clients on Clutch. One recent build, a merchant POS SaaS for a UAE fintech, processed 10,000+ transactions in its first 3 months and passed a 2025 PCI DSS audit. A fixed-price v1 launches in 12-14 weeks, then grows from there: SaaS application development with the audit trails, open banking integration, and PCI-DSS payment handling that financial software needs from day one.

This works when compliance is architectural, not an afterthought.

Everything on the left should already be true for your product. Even one thing on the right, and a generic SaaS build is the smarter first step.

A fit
01

A B2B fintech or financial software product with real users and a first enterprise customer asking for SOC 2 and multi-tenancy.

02

Compliance requirements that shape the architecture: audit trails, KYC/KYB, PCI-DSS scope, or open banking integration.

03

Budget for a fixed-price build, and a compliance posture you want designed in from week one rather than retrofitted.

Not a fit
01

A pre-revenue idea with no users and no enterprise customer in sight yet.

02

A generic SaaS product with no financial-compliance requirements a standard stack can't already meet.

03

You want the cheapest possible build and will trade compliance architecture to get there.

What we build

What goes into a fintech SaaS build

Ready to scope your fintech SaaS platform?

30 minutes. You leave with a compliance architecture outline, an integration assessment, and a fixed price. No commitment required.

How it works

From compliance scope to production

  1. Week 1
    01

    Compliance architecture and scope

    We map financial compliance requirements, PCI-DSS scope, audit trail design, open banking integration points, and multi-tenancy approach before any code is written. You leave week one with a written scope, a compliance architecture document, and a fixed-price quote.

  2. Weeks 2-3
    02

    Data model and design

    The multi-tenant data model, audit trail schema, and API contract are designed before development starts. Every screen is wireframed and reviewed. Subscription billing architecture and KYC/KYB workflow are finalised. OpenAPI specification drafted and reviewed before the first sprint.

  3. Weeks 4-12
    03

    Build, integrate, and QA

    Bi-weekly sprint delivery with a working staging environment from sprint one. Open banking integrations tested against provider sandboxes. Audit trail validated end-to-end. Stripe billing tested in live test mode before production cutover.

  4. Weeks 12-14
    04

    Launch and post-launch support

    Production deployment with infrastructure monitoring active on launch day. SOC 2 evidence collection started. Eight weeks of post-launch support: compliance issue resolution, integration tuning, and performance optimisation under real tenant load.

Scope decides where you land, not negotiation. Start with the v1 first phase, then grow into the full platform as tenants and integrations come on. Use the table to place your build, then the drivers below to see what moves you up the band.

Where your build lands

Scope tierWhat it includesInvestmentTimeline
Start here: v1 first phaseCore financial workflow, multi-tenant foundation with RBAC, immutable audit trail, and one open banking integration.$65,000-$110,00012-14 weeks to a validated v1
Full platform: grow intoAdds native mobile apps, KYC/KYB workflow, multiple open banking and payment integrations, PCI-DSS payment handling, and SOC 2-ready infrastructure.$110,000-$175,000Phased after the v1, as tenants come on
Open banking + payment integrations
One connection is in the v1. Each extra Plaid, TrueLayer, MX, or card-processor integration adds provider-sandbox testing and credential handling, and moves you up the band.
KYC / KYB workflow
Tenant-configurable identity and business verification (Jumio, Onfido, Middesk) with an exception review queue is the largest driver after mobile apps.
Native mobile apps
iOS and Android apps with biometric auth and mobile KYC onboarding roughly double the client-side surface to build and test.
PCI-DSS payment handling
Tokenized checkout keeps scope small. Bringing card acceptance itself in scope adds architecture and audit work.
SOC 2 readiness depth
Evidence collection and control design for a Type II audit scale with how soon your first enterprise buyer needs the report.

Fintech SaaS is where compliance debt is most expensive to unwind. These are the failure modes we design around from week one, not the month before the audit.

PCI-DSS scope creep
A later feature quietly touches raw card data and pulls the whole platform back into audit scope. We fix the card-data boundary in week one so scope stays small.
Audit trails bolted on late
An append-only log added after launch usually has gaps a regulator will find. We make the audit log a write path every state change goes through, from the first sprint.
Single-tenant assumptions in the data model
Queries and foreign keys written without a tenant boundary are costly to unpick once real customer data exists. The tenant key is in the schema before the first table ships.
Open banking token expiry
Aggregation breaks quietly when a bank rotates or revokes credentials. We build per-tenant reconnect and consent-refresh flows, not a one-time link.
SOC 2 evidence started too late
Controls that were never logged cannot be evidenced at audit time. Evidence collection is instrumented from launch day.

What it costs

Fintech SaaS, starting at $65,000.

A written compliance architecture, an integration assessment, and a firm quote in week one, before you spend a dollar on the build.

Cost drivers are the number of open banking and payment integrations, whether native mobile apps are required, and the depth of SOC 2 readiness. Most clients start with the core platform and add integrations once the first tenant is live.

Starting investment

Starts at $65,000

A validated v1 launches in 12-14 weeks. Compliance scope, the most common fintech cost driver, is nailed down in week one. Start with the core platform, then add integrations as tenants come on.

No hourly billing

Once we scope your first phase, that price is locked in writing. No hourly billing, and no mid-build surprises when the SOC 2 work turns out larger than estimated.

Post-launch support

Eight weeks of post-launch support included: audit trail validation, integration tuning, and performance optimisation under real tenant load, with SOC 2 evidence collection support during the first 30 days after launch.

Useful next steps

More on SaaS development

EHR Integration Services

Work with us

EHR Integration Services

See the service
Proof

Proof

Brux ships a dental marketing SaaS: AI smile previews, GoHighLevel sync, and self-serve onboarding built for 1,000-office scale

Read the case study
School Management System: Build Custom vs. Buy Off-the-Shelf (2026)

Article

School Management System: Build Custom vs. Buy Off-the-Shelf (2026)

PowerSchool, Infinite Campus, and Brightwheel work for most schools. But private K-12 networks, tutoring centers, and vocational schools hit real walls with generic platforms. Here is what custom school management software actually costs, when it makes sense, and how RaftLabs builds it.

Read more
PCI DSS compliance: Payment security laws for app builders

Article

PCI DSS compliance: Payment security laws for app builders

If your app processes, stores, or transmits credit card data, PCI DSS isn't optional - it's a contract requirement from every payment processor. Here's what the standard requires and how it shapes your app architecture.

Read more
Athlete Management Software Development: What It Costs and When to Build Instead of Buy

Article

Athlete Management Software Development: What It Costs and When to Build Instead of Buy

Smartabase and Kitman Labs centralize training load, wellness, injury, and testing data for performance teams. Here is what it costs to build your own ($35K-$130K), the three build phases, and when a club or governing body should build instead of license.

Read more
Cost to Build a CRM Like HubSpot: Architecture, Phases, and When to Go Custom

Article

Cost to Build a CRM Like HubSpot: Architecture, Phases, and When to Go Custom

CRM platform development costs $45K-$220K. This guide covers when to build vs buy, cost by phase, who the real buyers are, where projects fail, and how RaftLabs approaches these builds for SaaS companies and vertical markets.

Read more

Frequently asked questions

Three things make fintech SaaS genuinely different at the architecture level. First, audit trail requirements: financial regulators require a complete, immutable record of every transaction, account change, and access event. Building that into the platform from day one is straightforward. Retrofitting it onto an existing system costs significantly more and sometimes requires rebuilding the data model. Second, PCI-DSS scope: any SaaS platform that handles card data has PCI-DSS obligations. The scope is determined by the architecture: platforms that tokenize card data via Stripe or Braintree and never store raw PANs have a much smaller compliance footprint than platforms that handle card data directly. That decision is made at the schema level, not after the product ships. Third, enterprise procurement requirements: the first enterprise customer will ask for SOC 2, multi-tenant data isolation, and API documentation before signing. These are not features to add later. They are architectural decisions that need to be made before development starts if you want to close enterprise deals on a predictable timeline.

Yes. We start with an audit of the existing codebase and data model before recommending an approach. For most fintech products, the migration target is schema-per-tenant: each customer gets their own database schema within a shared database server. This gives strong isolation, satisfies most enterprise procurement requirements, and is technically tractable as a migration path from a single-tenant design. The migration is planned so existing customers stay on the working product while the multi-tenant version is built and validated in parallel. Data is migrated in phases with integrity validation at each step. We document the migration plan and get sign-off from your team before any data movement happens.

We connect to Plaid (US, UK, Canada, and Europe), TrueLayer (UK, Europe, and Australia), and MX (US). Capabilities: read-only account aggregation for balance and transaction history; account verification for ACH and direct debit setup; payment initiation for account-to-account transfers; and income and asset verification for lending decisioning. For fintech SaaS platforms, the integration is typically tenant-specific, each business customer connects to their own banking data, so the integration layer needs to support multiple credential sets per tenant. We design that architecture into the platform from the start. The integration approach and data scope are confirmed during week-one discovery.

We build KYC and KYB as a configurable workflow component in the platform. KYC covers identity verification (document capture, liveness detection, AML and sanctions screening) via Jumio, Onfido, or Stripe Identity. KYB covers business entity verification (company registration checks, beneficial ownership, director identity verification) via Middesk, Stripe Treasury, or regional providers. For SaaS platforms, the KYC/KYB workflow is tenant-configurable: each business customer can set their own verification requirements and risk thresholds. Exception cases route to a compliance review queue. Verification status is written to the audit trail. The design is reviewed with your compliance team before development begins.

Most clients start with a v1 first phase: core financial workflow, multi-tenant architecture, audit trails, and one open banking integration. That phase runs $65,000 to $110,000 and launches in 12-14 weeks. The full platform grows from there, adding mobile apps, KYC/KYB workflow, multiple open banking integrations, PCI-DSS compliant payment handling, and SOC 2-ready infrastructure, reaching $110,000 to $175,000. Cost drivers are the number of open banking and payment integrations, whether native mobile apps are required, the complexity of the KYC/KYB workflow, and the depth of SOC 2 readiness required. The fixed total for each phase is agreed before development starts.

It depends on your product, your market, and who you are selling to. SOC 2 Type II is required by most enterprise B2B buyers before signing. It demonstrates that your security controls are audited and effective. Design for it from day one. PCI-DSS applies if your platform handles payment card data. Scope it correctly at the architecture stage by routing card data through a PCI-certified processor (Stripe, Adyen) so raw card data never touches your servers. GDPR applies to any platform handling personal data of EU residents. Data residency controls, right-to-erasure workflows, and breach notification procedures need to be in the architecture before EU customers onboard. Financial regulatory requirements (FCA, FinCEN, state money transmission) depend on your product type. We scope compliance requirements in week one and design them into the architecture before development begins.

Work with us

Tell us where the work is stuck.

Bring the rough workflow, half-built product, or messy brief. We will map the smallest useful first move, then send scope, timeline, and price in plain English.

  • Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
  • Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
  • Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
  • 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
  • All conversations are NDA-protected.