Fintech SaaS development with compliance built into the schema.
Financial services software has compliance requirements that most generic SaaS infrastructure is not designed to meet. Audit trails for financial regulation, KYC/KYB workflow, PCI-DSS handling, and open banking integration are not features you add later. They are architectural decisions that shape the data model, the tenant isolation strategy, and the vendor selection from the start. RaftLabs builds multi-tenant SaaS platforms for fintech companies, financial software vendors, and B2B fintech startups where financial compliance and security are built into the schema, not retrofitted before the first enterprise customer signs.
Financial compliance built into the architecture from day one, not added before enterprise customers ask for it
Multi-tenant SaaS with audit trails designed for financial regulation and SOC 2 readiness
Open banking integration via Plaid and TrueLayer, KYC/KYB workflow, PCI-DSS data handling
Subscription and usage-based billing via Stripe with tenant-level plan management
API-first architecture for the integrations that follow enterprise fintech deals
Fixed price, with a validated v1 live in 12-14 weeks, then grow the platform from there
4.8 Google Play rating Mobile POS SaaS
Bring the problem, the current workflow, or the existing code. We reply with a practical next step within one business day.
Trusted by
The brief
Start with what is not working.
Good software decisions begin with the constraint, not a list of features or a preferred technology.
01
B2B fintech startup with a working prototype and a first enterprise customer who needs SOC 2 and multi-tenancy before signing?
02
Financial software company running a single-tenant product that needs to serve 500 clients without a separate deployment per customer?
03
Payments company building a SaaS merchant dashboard and discovering PCI-DSS scope after the architecture is already set?
Plain answer
RaftLabs builds multi-tenant SaaS platforms for fintech companies and B2B financial software vendors. Capabilities include financial audit trails, KYC/KYB workflow, PCI-DSS data handling, open banking via Plaid and TrueLayer, and subscription billing. Financial compliance is built into the schema from day one. A fixed-price v1 starts at $65,000 and launches in 12-14 weeks, then grows as tenants and integrations are added.
What to remember
RaftLabs builds multi-tenant fintech SaaS platforms with financial compliance built into the schema from day one, not retrofitted later
A fixed-price v1 launches in 12-14 weeks, then the platform grows as tenants and integrations are added
Open banking integrations supported include Plaid, TrueLayer, and MX for account aggregation, payment initiation, and income verification
KYC and KYB workflow is tenant-configurable with verification status written to the audit trail
A v1 first phase starts at $65,000 to $110,000; the full platform grows to $110,000 to $175,000 as mobile apps, KYC/KYB, and more integrations are added
SOC 2 readiness and PCI-DSS scope are architectural decisions designed in from week one, not added before the first enterprise customer asks
The deal was ready to sign. Then the security questionnaire arrived.
A B2B fintech startup had a working prototype and its first enterprise customer ready to sign. Then procurement sent the security questionnaire: SOC 2, multi-tenant data isolation, and an audit trail covering every balance update, permission change, and login. None of it was in the prototype.
Retrofitting compliance onto a single-tenant product means rebuilding the data model, the tenant isolation, and the vendor choices that were locked in months ago. The build that should have taken weeks becomes a rewrite, and the enterprise deal waits on it.
Compliance is not a feature you add before the first enterprise customer asks. It is the schema you start with.
According to IBM's 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report, financial industry data breaches cost an average of $6.08 million per incident, the second-highest of any sector. For fintech SaaS platforms, the risk is architectural: platforms that reach production without compliance controls embedded in the data model face breach costs that dwarf the cost of building it right the first time.
RaftLabs builds multi-tenant SaaS platforms for fintech companies, financial software vendors, and B2B fintech startups, with financial compliance built into the schema, not retrofitted before the first enterprise customer signs. We have shipped products in production across fintech, healthcare, hospitality, and logistics, and are rated 4.9/5 by clients on Clutch. One recent build, a merchant POS SaaS for a UAE fintech, processed 10,000+ transactions in its first 3 months and passed a 2025 PCI DSS audit. A fixed-price v1 launches in 12-14 weeks, then grows from there: SaaS application development with the audit trails, open banking integration, and PCI-DSS payment handling that financial software needs from day one.
This works when compliance is architectural, not an afterthought.
Everything on the left should already be true for your product. Even one thing on the right, and a generic SaaS build is the smarter first step.
A fit
01
A B2B fintech or financial software product with real users and a first enterprise customer asking for SOC 2 and multi-tenancy.
02
Compliance requirements that shape the architecture: audit trails, KYC/KYB, PCI-DSS scope, or open banking integration.
03
Budget for a fixed-price build, and a compliance posture you want designed in from week one rather than retrofitted.
Not a fit
01
A pre-revenue idea with no users and no enterprise customer in sight yet.
02
A generic SaaS product with no financial-compliance requirements a standard stack can't already meet.
03
You want the cheapest possible build and will trade compliance architecture to get there.
Immutable audit log of every transaction, account change, and access event. Configurable retention policy. Export for regulatory review. Built into the data model from the start, not added as a separate service. SOC 2 Type II readiness designed in from week one.
Configurable identity and business verification workflow via Jumio, Onfido, or Stripe Identity. KYB covers company registration, beneficial ownership, and director verification. Tenant-configurable risk thresholds. Exception routing to compliance review queue. Verification status written to audit trail.
Stripe-powered billing with per-seat, per-transaction, and usage-based plans. Tenant-level plan management without code deployments. Enterprise invoicing, purchase order workflows, and offline billing for financial services buyers with procurement teams.
07
API-first architecture for fintech integrations
REST and webhook-based API designed for the integrations enterprise fintech deals require: ERP connectors, accounting platforms, identity providers, and payment rails. OpenAPI documentation delivered as part of the build. SDK generation available for customer-facing APIs.
30 minutes. You leave with a compliance architecture outline, an integration assessment, and a fixed price. No commitment required.
How it works
From compliance scope to production
Week 1
01
Compliance architecture and scope
We map financial compliance requirements, PCI-DSS scope, audit trail design, open banking integration points, and multi-tenancy approach before any code is written. You leave week one with a written scope, a compliance architecture document, and a fixed-price quote.
Weeks 2-3
02
Data model and design
The multi-tenant data model, audit trail schema, and API contract are designed before development starts. Every screen is wireframed and reviewed. Subscription billing architecture and KYC/KYB workflow are finalised. OpenAPI specification drafted and reviewed before the first sprint.
Weeks 4-12
03
Build, integrate, and QA
Bi-weekly sprint delivery with a working staging environment from sprint one. Open banking integrations tested against provider sandboxes. Audit trail validated end-to-end. Stripe billing tested in live test mode before production cutover.
Weeks 12-14
04
Launch and post-launch support
Production deployment with infrastructure monitoring active on launch day. SOC 2 evidence collection started. Eight weeks of post-launch support: compliance issue resolution, integration tuning, and performance optimisation under real tenant load.
Scope decides where you land, not negotiation. Start with the v1 first phase, then grow into the full platform as tenants and integrations come on. Use the table to place your build, then the drivers below to see what moves you up the band.
Where your build lands
Scope tier
What it includes
Investment
Timeline
Start here: v1 first phase
Core financial workflow, multi-tenant foundation with RBAC, immutable audit trail, and one open banking integration.
$65,000-$110,000
12-14 weeks to a validated v1
Full platform: grow into
Adds native mobile apps, KYC/KYB workflow, multiple open banking and payment integrations, PCI-DSS payment handling, and SOC 2-ready infrastructure.
$110,000-$175,000
Phased after the v1, as tenants come on
Open banking + payment integrations
One connection is in the v1. Each extra Plaid, TrueLayer, MX, or card-processor integration adds provider-sandbox testing and credential handling, and moves you up the band.
KYC / KYB workflow
Tenant-configurable identity and business verification (Jumio, Onfido, Middesk) with an exception review queue is the largest driver after mobile apps.
Native mobile apps
iOS and Android apps with biometric auth and mobile KYC onboarding roughly double the client-side surface to build and test.
PCI-DSS payment handling
Tokenized checkout keeps scope small. Bringing card acceptance itself in scope adds architecture and audit work.
SOC 2 readiness depth
Evidence collection and control design for a Type II audit scale with how soon your first enterprise buyer needs the report.
Fintech SaaS is where compliance debt is most expensive to unwind. These are the failure modes we design around from week one, not the month before the audit.
PCI-DSS scope creep
A later feature quietly touches raw card data and pulls the whole platform back into audit scope. We fix the card-data boundary in week one so scope stays small.
Audit trails bolted on late
An append-only log added after launch usually has gaps a regulator will find. We make the audit log a write path every state change goes through, from the first sprint.
Single-tenant assumptions in the data model
Queries and foreign keys written without a tenant boundary are costly to unpick once real customer data exists. The tenant key is in the schema before the first table ships.
Open banking token expiry
Aggregation breaks quietly when a bank rotates or revokes credentials. We build per-tenant reconnect and consent-refresh flows, not a one-time link.
SOC 2 evidence started too late
Controls that were never logged cannot be evidenced at audit time. Evidence collection is instrumented from launch day.
What it costs
Fintech SaaS, starting at $65,000.
A written compliance architecture, an integration assessment, and a firm quote in week one, before you spend a dollar on the build.
Cost drivers are the number of open banking and payment integrations, whether native mobile apps are required, and the depth of SOC 2 readiness. Most clients start with the core platform and add integrations once the first tenant is live.
Starting investment
Starts at $65,000
A validated v1 launches in 12-14 weeks. Compliance scope, the most common fintech cost driver, is nailed down in week one. Start with the core platform, then add integrations as tenants come on.
No hourly billing
Once we scope your first phase, that price is locked in writing. No hourly billing, and no mid-build surprises when the SOC 2 work turns out larger than estimated.
Post-launch support
Eight weeks of post-launch support included: audit trail validation, integration tuning, and performance optimisation under real tenant load, with SOC 2 evidence collection support during the first 30 days after launch.
Three things make fintech SaaS genuinely different at the architecture level. First, audit trail requirements: financial regulators require a complete, immutable record of every transaction, account change, and access event. Building that into the platform from day one is straightforward. Retrofitting it onto an existing system costs significantly more and sometimes requires rebuilding the data model. Second, PCI-DSS scope: any SaaS platform that handles card data has PCI-DSS obligations. The scope is determined by the architecture: platforms that tokenize card data via Stripe or Braintree and never store raw PANs have a much smaller compliance footprint than platforms that handle card data directly. That decision is made at the schema level, not after the product ships. Third, enterprise procurement requirements: the first enterprise customer will ask for SOC 2, multi-tenant data isolation, and API documentation before signing. These are not features to add later. They are architectural decisions that need to be made before development starts if you want to close enterprise deals on a predictable timeline.
Yes. We start with an audit of the existing codebase and data model before recommending an approach. For most fintech products, the migration target is schema-per-tenant: each customer gets their own database schema within a shared database server. This gives strong isolation, satisfies most enterprise procurement requirements, and is technically tractable as a migration path from a single-tenant design. The migration is planned so existing customers stay on the working product while the multi-tenant version is built and validated in parallel. Data is migrated in phases with integrity validation at each step. We document the migration plan and get sign-off from your team before any data movement happens.
We connect to Plaid (US, UK, Canada, and Europe), TrueLayer (UK, Europe, and Australia), and MX (US). Capabilities: read-only account aggregation for balance and transaction history; account verification for ACH and direct debit setup; payment initiation for account-to-account transfers; and income and asset verification for lending decisioning. For fintech SaaS platforms, the integration is typically tenant-specific, each business customer connects to their own banking data, so the integration layer needs to support multiple credential sets per tenant. We design that architecture into the platform from the start. The integration approach and data scope are confirmed during week-one discovery.
We build KYC and KYB as a configurable workflow component in the platform. KYC covers identity verification (document capture, liveness detection, AML and sanctions screening) via Jumio, Onfido, or Stripe Identity. KYB covers business entity verification (company registration checks, beneficial ownership, director identity verification) via Middesk, Stripe Treasury, or regional providers. For SaaS platforms, the KYC/KYB workflow is tenant-configurable: each business customer can set their own verification requirements and risk thresholds. Exception cases route to a compliance review queue. Verification status is written to the audit trail. The design is reviewed with your compliance team before development begins.
Most clients start with a v1 first phase: core financial workflow, multi-tenant architecture, audit trails, and one open banking integration. That phase runs $65,000 to $110,000 and launches in 12-14 weeks. The full platform grows from there, adding mobile apps, KYC/KYB workflow, multiple open banking integrations, PCI-DSS compliant payment handling, and SOC 2-ready infrastructure, reaching $110,000 to $175,000. Cost drivers are the number of open banking and payment integrations, whether native mobile apps are required, the complexity of the KYC/KYB workflow, and the depth of SOC 2 readiness required. The fixed total for each phase is agreed before development starts.
It depends on your product, your market, and who you are selling to. SOC 2 Type II is required by most enterprise B2B buyers before signing. It demonstrates that your security controls are audited and effective. Design for it from day one. PCI-DSS applies if your platform handles payment card data. Scope it correctly at the architecture stage by routing card data through a PCI-certified processor (Stripe, Adyen) so raw card data never touches your servers. GDPR applies to any platform handling personal data of EU residents. Data residency controls, right-to-erasure workflows, and breach notification procedures need to be in the architecture before EU customers onboard. Financial regulatory requirements (FCA, FinCEN, state money transmission) depend on your product type. We scope compliance requirements in week one and design them into the architecture before development begins.
Work with us
Tell us where the work is stuck.
Bring the rough workflow, half-built product, or messy brief. We will map the smallest useful first move, then send scope, timeline, and price in plain English.
Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.