Insurance Agency Management Software

Agency management software built around your book of business, not Applied Epic's data model

Most independent agencies run their back office on Applied Epic, EZLynx, or a patchwork of spreadsheets bolted onto whichever AMS they started with. Policy data sits in one place, billing in another, and commission reconciliation happens in Excel because the platform's built-in reports don't match how the agency actually splits producer pay. We build a purpose-built agency management system around your agency's real policy, billing, and commission workflow, instead of forcing that workflow into an incumbent's template.

  • Policy management across every carrier your agency writes with

  • Billing and invoicing that matches how your agency actually bills clients

  • Commission tracking built around your agency's real producer splits

  • Fixed-cost delivery, scoped up front, with source code ownership

See our work

Bring the problem, the current workflow, or the existing code. We reply with a practical next step within one business day.

Trusted by

Perceptional logoMusgrave GroupUrShipper logoBrux Dental SolutionsBella Skin Institute LogoEnergia RewardsDraftly logoTuneClub LogoSekou LMS logoLogo of food order management app gulaSnelwegDealsGrubly logoPSi logoInstantor Rewards logologo of Mobile app for events, membership clubs, and communitiesAldiFest retail campaign logoVidmattic logoEMS Connect logoWorx Squad logologo of Online Web App For Making Intrologo of Referral and Viral Marketing PlatformConcurrences logoGitano Perfumes logoBank of America logoNike logoMicrosoft logoCisco logoWells Fargo logoGE logoJimmy Choo logoT-Mobile logoIconmobile logoVodafone logoUniversity of Southern California (USC) logoTicketstop logo

The brief

Start with what is not working.

Good software decisions begin with the constraint, not a list of features or a preferred technology.

01

Your team exporting Applied Epic or EZLynx reports into Excel every month because the built-in commission reports don't match how your agency actually splits producer pay?

02

Paying per-user license fees for an AMS that still can't handle your agency's carrier mix or billing structure without manual workarounds?

Plain answer

Insurance agency management software, often called an AMS, is the back-office system an insurance agency uses to manage policies, billing, commission tracking, and carrier connections across every line it writes. Independent agencies and brokerages buy it to replace manual reconciliation and per-user licensing on incumbent platforms. RaftLabs builds custom agency management systems for agencies whose commission structure or carrier mix has outgrown an off-the-shelf template. Every build is fixed cost, scoped and agreed in writing before development starts.

What to remember

  • Agencies outgrow Applied Epic and EZLynx's rigid data model as they add carriers, product lines, and producer splits the template wasn't built to handle.
  • Commission tracking is the most common reason agencies look at custom software: their split structure doesn't map to what a standard AMS report shows.
  • Per-user seat pricing on incumbent platforms gets more expensive as an agency grows headcount, with no way to pay only for the workflows the agency actually uses.

Proof

software products shipped since 2015
100+
RaftLabs delivery record
scope and cost agreed in writing before any development starts
Fixed price
Every RaftLabs engagement

Reconciliation shouldn't be a monthly Excel project

This is not a client-facing quoting or servicing portal, that's a separate product. Insurance agency management software is the back-office operating system your agency runs on: every policy across every carrier, billing and invoicing, commission tracking against your agency's real producer splits, workflow automation, and the carrier connections that keep policy data current. An agent portal, if your agency has one, plugs into this system, it doesn't replace it. We build the operating system underneath, sized to your agency's actual structure instead of a template built for every agency at once.

Capabilities

What we build

Policy management across every carrier

Every policy your agency writes tracked in one place, regardless of which carrier or MGA it's placed with, replacing the mix of AMS records and spreadsheets agencies default to when the incumbent platform doesn't fit.

Billing and invoicing

Agency bill and direct bill handled the way your agency actually bills clients, with payment tracking and aging built around your process instead of a generic invoicing module.

Commission tracking and reconciliation

Commission logic built around your agency's real split structure, tiered splits, overrides, and agency bill versus direct bill, so producers can reconcile what they're owed without a spreadsheet.

Workflow automation

Renewal reminders, policy servicing tasks, and follow-ups automated around your agency's process, so nothing depends on someone remembering to check a spreadsheet.

Carrier connections and data feeds

Download feeds and integrations with the carriers your agency places business with, scoped during discovery, keeping policy and billing data current without manual re-entry.

Reporting built around how your agency runs

Production, retention, and commission reporting built around the numbers your agency actually reviews, not a fixed report template.

How we work

From workflow mapping to live software

  1. Weeks 1-3
    01

    Discovery and workflow mapping

    We map your agency's policy workflow, billing process, commission structure, and carrier mix. You leave with a written scope and a fixed-price quote.

  2. Weeks 3-6
    02

    Data architecture and integration design

    We design the policy and commission data model and the carrier integration layer, matched to your agency's actual structure rather than a generic AMS schema.

  3. Weeks 6-18
    03

    Working software every two weeks

    You review working software at each sprint. Policy management, billing, and commission tracking are built and tested incrementally.

  4. Final 3-4 weeks
    04

    Testing and rollout

    The system runs against real policy and commission data so your team can validate reconciliation before producers depend on it.

Working with us

What a RaftLabs build includes

  • 01

    The team that scopes builds the system

    The people who map your commission structure and carrier mix also build the system. No offshore handoff after the contract is signed.

  • 02

    Fixed price before development starts

    We scope the work, calculate the cost, and lock it in writing before any development starts.

  • 03

    Founded 2015

    A track record building financial back-office systems that handle policy, billing, and commission data with the reconciliation accuracy agencies depend on.

  • 04

    You own the source code

    No per-user licensing and no vendor lock-in after delivery. The codebase, and everything built into it, is yours.

Work with us

Have an insurance agency management software project?

Tell us how your agency tracks policies, billing, and commissions today, and where the incumbent platform stops fitting. We'll scope a fixed-cost build.

  • Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
  • Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
  • Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
  • 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
  • All conversations are NDA-protected.

Common questions

Insurance agency management software, often called an AMS, is the system an insurance agency uses to manage policies, billing, and commissions across every carrier it places business with. It replaces manual reconciliation and spreadsheet tracking with a single system built around the agency's actual workflow.

Yes. Commission structures vary agency to agency: tiered splits, override arrangements, agency bill versus direct bill, and a standard AMS report often can't reproduce them. We build the commission logic around your agency's real split structure during discovery, so reconciliation matches what producers are actually owed.

Yes. We scope which carrier download feeds and integrations matter most to your agency during discovery, then build the connections that keep policy and billing data current without manual re-entry.

Cost follows scope: the carrier mix, the commission structure complexity, and how many carrier connections need building. A focused MVP covers policy management, billing, and commission tracking; a full build adds workflow automation and carrier connections. We scope a fixed cost after discovery.

Applied Epic and EZLynx are strong, established platforms for agencies whose policy, billing, and commission workflow fits their standard model. Custom software makes sense once your agency's commission structure, carrier mix, or billing process has outgrown what the template supports, or once per-user licensing costs work against you as you add headcount. We help assess the right fit during discovery.

Yes. We extract policies, clients, activities, attachments, and commission history from your current AMS and map them into the new system with reconciliation reports so nothing goes missing. The riskiest part is usually commission splits and producer hierarchies, which we validate against your carrier statements before cutover.

We build with encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access down to the field level, and full audit logging of who viewed or changed policyholder records. For agencies handling health or financial products, we scope state-specific privacy rules and carrier security questionnaires during discovery so there are no surprises at renewal.

The sale lives in the CRM and the policy lives in the AMS, and nothing joins them until someone builds the join. Quote-to-bind ratio, at-risk renewals, commission variances, and the cross-sell book stay invisible until the month-end spreadsheet rebuild. A CRM subscription and an AMS purchase cover different work. Ask whether the AMS can own all policy data storage and reporting, or whether you are paying twice for the same record.

At-risk renewals are the flagship blind spot: invisible while quote data and policy data never join. When systems are split, commission variances stay invisible until the month-end spreadsheet rebuild. Once the two systems join in one governed report matched on client and effective date, the blind spots turn into a nightly worklist: quote-to-bind ratio, at-risk renewals, commission variances, and the cross-sell book.

Yes. We model agencies, branches, and producers as separate entities with their own commission structures, carrier appointments, and reporting, while group leadership gets consolidated dashboards. Shared clients across locations are deduplicated so service staff see one record, not three.