Custom construction management software that runs the job site, not the trailer.

Scope decides the price. A focused v1 covers project scheduling, daily logs, budget vs actual cost tracking, and the offline field app. A full platform adds safety compliance modules, equipment management, subcontractor portals, and deep accounting integration. We scope in fixed-price phases, so you know the cost of each stage before it starts.

A focused v1 covers scheduling, daily logs, cost tracking, and the offline field app, integrated with one accounting system. Safety compliance and equipment modules follow. Accounting and Procore integration are scoped in discovery, because the data mapping between your chart of accounts and the platform's cost codes is where these projects live or die. We launch the v1 with one pilot crew, harden it on a live job, then roll out company-wide: a construction crew that hits bugs early will not give the app a second chance.

Every job gets a budget broken down by cost code, matching your accounting structure. Committed costs (subcontracts, purchase orders) and actual costs (payroll, invoices, equipment hours) flow in automatically from integrations or manual entry, and the dashboard shows budget vs actual per cost code in real time. Change orders are logged against the job with approval status, so the projected final cost updates as changes get approved instead of surprising you at closeout. PMs get alerts when any cost code crosses a threshold, like 80% of budget spent. At month end, the same data feeds your WIP reporting without a second round of spreadsheet reconciliation.

Toolbox talk scheduling and sign-off capture, so every talk is logged with attendees, topic, and date. Incident and near-miss reporting from the field app with photo attachments and automatic notifications to the safety manager. OSHA 300 log generation from the incident data, plus inspection checklists for equipment and site conditions. Corrective action tracking: every incident gets an assigned owner and a due date, and the dashboard flags overdue items. For firms working under owner or GC safety programs, we can build the specific reporting formats your clients require, because a generic safety module that doesn't match the contract spec is shelfware.

Yes. Common integrations: Procore (project directory, drawings, RFIs, submittals via the Procore API), Sage 300 CRE (job cost, AP, payroll via the Sage API or ODBC), Autodesk Construction Cloud (BIM 360 document management and model coordination), and QuickBooks (for smaller firms on QuickBooks Enterprise). We also integrate with Foundation, Viewpoint Vista, and CMiC where clients run them. Integration scope is confirmed in discovery: we map your chart of accounts and cost codes to the platform's data model before any code is written, because a cost tracking tool that posts to the wrong codes is worse than a spreadsheet. Every integration is tested against a staging environment with your real data shape before production cutover.

Buy when your workflow matches the product. If Procore or Buildertrend covers 90% of what your crews do, buy it. Build when the gaps are structural: per-seat pricing that punishes you for growing the crew, workflows the product can't model (specialty trade sequences, owner-specific reporting), or data that has to flow between systems the product won't integrate with. The honest middle path is also common: keep Procore for document management and build the custom layer around cost tracking and field reporting where the off-the-shelf tools are weakest. We will tell you in the first call if buying is the better move.

Price the full stack, not the headline subscription: the core licence plus mandatory add-ons, per-user fees as the crew grows, and the cost of getting your data out if you leave. Compare vendors on where your workflows live: Procore for GCs running many projects, Autodesk where BIM and design coordination are central, CMiC where financials come first. Ask whether your workflows live in the field or the model, and price everything that follows from the answer.

Change orders determine profitability. The discipline: identify scope changes immediately, document on site, price transparently while conditions are visible, and secure written approval before executing. Pause work until it is priced and approved. Disputes come from how the change was communicated and managed, not the change itself. Automate creation to approval so budgets update instantly when changes are approved. The job site runs on paper. The office runs on spreadsheets. Nobody runs the job, until change orders have one disciplined loop.

Vendors quote impressive accuracy numbers but results depend on your data quality. Run a pilot on a live project and judge the AI on your own jobs before signing. Estimators will not trade their workflow for a black box: copilot framing accelerates the existing workflow rather than replacing it. A mobile app for site staff is table stakes; field-office isolation is the failure mode. And the contract question: which records get loaded versus re-keyed in writing, can pending or rejected change orders carry their status, how is load completeness proved, how do we get all data out in documented format if we leave, and at what cost?

Ask the full-stack question: what do the mandatory add-ons cost (payment applications, RAMS) versus the headline subscription? Ask the change-order question: identify, document, price, approve before executing. Does the workflow enforce it? Ask the field question: will crews actually use it, does it accelerate the existing workflow or replace it with a black box? Ask the document question: automatic version tracking that flags and deactivates outdated documents, so crews build from the current plans, not outdated ones. And the exit question: how do we get all data out, in what format, at what cost?

The field app is offline-first by design, not as a fallback. Crews download the day's work plan, drawings, and checklists when they have signal. On site with no coverage, they file daily logs, capture progress photos, complete safety checklists, and log equipment hours normally. Everything is timestamped and stored on the device. When signal returns, the app syncs all queued activity to the server in order, and the office dashboard updates. No lost logs, no foreman re-entering the day's work from the trailer at 6pm. This matters because job sites are connectivity deserts by nature: steel structures, basements, and rural greenfield sites. We test the offline path on the actual devices your crews carry, including the oldest phones in the field, not just new test hardware.