Airworthiness Compliance Software Development

Built around your fleet's actual configuration, not a commercial CAMO template

Commercial continuing airworthiness management systems handle the standard AD tracking workflow, but CAMOs managing specialist fleets, legacy aircraft, or mixed-registry aircraft often find that standard systems cannot model their compliance methods, their AD applicability determinations, or their audit evidence requirements without significant manual workarounds. We build airworthiness compliance systems designed around your fleet and your CAMO approval.

  • AD applicability determination by aircraft serial number, engine, and installed equipment

  • Compliance method recording with audit evidence links

  • Due date calculation that recalculates automatically on new utilisation data

  • CAMO audit pack generation from live records

Recent outcomes

Voice AI · Research

6× deeper insights

Text-based interviews converted to automated phone calls

AI Automation · Ops

20k+ txns day one

Manual invoice OCR across 40+ gas stations

Loyalty · Retail

1,062 users in 4 weeks

SuperValu & Centra loyalty platform with receipt validation

SaaS · Logistics

2,000+ shipments yr 1

Multi-carrier shipping hub for Indonesian eCommerce

4.9
on Clutch
See our work

The problem

Sound familiar?

  • Continuing airworthiness engineers maintaining an AD compliance register in a spreadsheet that requires manual recalculation every time new flight hours are received?

  • An upcoming CAMO audit requiring weeks of preparation to compile evidence that should be available at any point in time?

Short answer

RaftLabs builds custom airworthiness compliance software for CAMOs managing specialist fleets, legacy aircraft, or mixed-registry aircraft. The system handles AD applicability determination by aircraft serial number range, compliance method recording with audit evidence links, automatic due date recalculation when utilisation data updates, and CAMO audit pack generation from live records. Most projects deliver in 12 to 18 weeks at a fixed cost, typically $50,000 to $180,000.

Key takeaways

  • Standard CAMO platforms (CAMP Systems, AMOS, Flightdocs) serve large commercial operators well but break down for mixed-registry or legacy fleets with non-standard AD applicability logic.
  • AD applicability is determined per aircraft against serial number, engine, propeller, and equipment configuration, with the reasoning captured for audit rather than left in an engineer's head.
  • Due dates recalculate automatically on every new hours/cycles update - the register never goes stale between maintenance visits.
  • A focused build (applicability, compliance recording, due dates, alerts) runs $50,000-$100,000; adding CAMO audit support and multi-registry coverage brings it to $100,000-$180,000.

Trusted by

Vodafone logo
Aldi logo
Nike logo
Microsoft logo
Heineken logo
Cisco logo
Calorgas logo
Energia Rewards logo

Compliance software delivery, by the numbers

software products shipped
100+
cost delivery
Fixed
week delivery cycles
12-18
industries served
24+

When commercial CAMO systems fall short for your fleet

CAMP Systems, Swiss Aviation Software AMOS, and Flightdocs serve large commercial operators well. The limitation appears when a CAMO manages a fleet with characteristics outside the platform's assumptions: multiple aircraft types from different registries, older aircraft where the type certificate configuration differs from the current baseline, or engines and components where AD applicability is determined by manufacturer serial number range rather than aircraft type alone.

Custom airworthiness compliance software is built around your fleet's actual configuration, the specific aircraft, engine, propeller, and component combinations you operate, with compliance method recording, due date calculation, and audit preparation matched to your CAMO's evidence requirements.

Capabilities

What we build

  • 01
    AD applicability determination

    Applicability analysis for each registration against type certificate, serial number, engine, propeller, and installed equipment, matched to each AD's effectivity statement. Applicability determinations are recorded with the engineer's reasoning, and configuration changes (an engine change, an STC) trigger automatic re-evaluation.

  • 02
    Compliance method recording

    Each applicable AD's compliance record captures the approved means of compliance, the source document, and any alternative means of compliance approved by the authority. Evidence, the maintenance work order or inspection report, links directly to the compliance record for audit retrieval.

  • 03
    Due date calculation and tracking

    Repetitive AD due dates recalculate automatically on hours, cycles, or calendar time as new utilisation data arrives. Multi-threshold tracking (warning plus mandatory date) lets engineers plan a maintenance visit ahead of the deadline rather than reacting to it.

  • 04
    Alert generation and escalation

    Configurable lead times by AD category (mandatory, alert, routine) trigger pre-due alerts to the responsible engineer, with overdue escalation to the quality manager and aircraft owner. A daily fleet status report shows every AD due in the next 30, 60, and 90 days.

  • 05
    Continued airworthiness documentation

    Continued airworthiness records compile AD history, component life records, and modification records per aircraft into a single retrievable set, the basis for sale documentation. Component time and cycle tracking updates automatically from flight log data.

  • 06
    CAMO audit support

    Audit preparation compiles the compliance evidence package automatically from system records rather than by manual assembly. A pre-audit gap check flags applicable ADs with missing evidence or expired compliance dates before the auditor finds them.

How we work

From scope to live compliance system

  1. Week 1
    01

    Fleet and registry scoping

    We map your fleet configuration, registries, and current AD tracking method. You leave week 1 with a written scope document and a fixed-price quote.

  2. Weeks 2-5
    02

    Applicability and compliance-method design

    AD applicability logic and compliance recording structure designed against your actual fleet configuration.

  3. Weeks 6-15
    03

    Build and integrate

    Applicability engine, due date calculation, and audit evidence library built in parallel, tested against real fleet data.

  4. Final 2-3 weeks
    04

    Launch and CAMO training

    Engineering team trained on the compliance workflow before full fleet rollout.

Why us

Why CAMOs choose RaftLabs

  • 01
    Senior engineers build what they scope

    The engineers who assess your fleet also build the solution. No bait-and-switch, no offshore handoff after the contract is signed.

  • 02
    Fixed price before development starts

    We scope the work, calculate the cost, and lock it in writing before any development starts.

  • 03
    9 years and 100+ products shipped

    Clients include Vodafone, T-Mobile, Aldi, Nike, Cisco, and Lockheed Martin. Track record building compliance-critical, audit-facing platforms.

  • 04
    We'll tell you when a commercial CAMO platform is enough

    Custom software is justified by mixed-registry, legacy-fleet, or non-standard applicability needs, not recommended by default.

  • 05
    Audit evidence assembled automatically

    The audit pack compiles from live system records, not from an engineer's weeks of manual preparation.

Have an airworthiness compliance project?

Tell us about your fleet: the aircraft types you manage, the regulatory authorities you report to, and where your current process creates risk or audit burden. We'll scope a system built around your actual fleet configuration.

Airworthiness Compliance Software Development, scoped in one call.

Tell us what's broken. Within one business day you get a straight take on cost, timeline, and the right first step. No deck, no pressure.

Stay on topic

More on compliance & security

Frequently asked questions

Yes. The system supports multiple regulatory authority feeds, FAA, EASA, CASA, CAA, and others, with AD applicability determination run separately for each aircraft based on its registry. An aircraft on a foreign registry operating under a bilateral agreement can have its FAA AD compliance requirements tracked alongside locally-mandated requirements in the same system.

The applicability determination logic handles effectivity statements based on aircraft serial number, engine serial number, propeller serial number, and installed equipment. Configuration changes that affect applicability, such as an engine change or modification, trigger a re-evaluation of all AD applicability for the affected aircraft.

Yes. Continued airworthiness records, AD compliance history, component life records, and modification records can be exported as a structured data package and a PDF summary for disclosure to a prospective purchaser or receiving authority on import. The system retains the complete history for the life of the aircraft regardless of CAMO changes.

A focused build covering AD applicability determination, compliance recording, due date calculation, and alert generation typically runs $50,000 to $100,000 depending on fleet size and regulatory authority integrations. Adding CAMO audit support, continued airworthiness documentation, and multi-registry coverage brings the total to $100,000 to $180,000. Fixed cost agreed before development starts.

Work with us

Tell us what you need. We'll tell you what it would take.

We scope Airworthiness Compliance Software Development in 30 minutes. You walk away with a clear cost, timeline, and approach. No commitment required.

  • Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
  • Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
  • Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
  • 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
  • All conversations are NDA-protected.