Authentication
Whether sessions, password reset, and account recovery are real, or whether the AI builder stubbed in a login screen that doesn't actually gate anything.
Free Vibe Coding Security Review
Free, manual review — not an automated scan
AI app builders ship a working demo, not a secure backend. See what's actually exposed before your users do.
What's actually load-bearing
Which parts of your Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, or Emergent build are solid, and which ones only work in the demo.
The specific gaps that'll bite you
Exposed keys, fake auth, unwired Stripe webhooks, missing Supabase Row Level Security, no rollback plan.
A prioritized list you can act on
Ranked by risk, not padded to look thorough. Forward it to your own team or come back to us.
Proof
Reviewed by the same team that takes AI-tool prototypes into production, across 20+ MVP engagements.
Direct answer
A free vibe coding security review is a manual audit of an app built with an AI coding tool (Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, Emergent, or similar), checking authentication, payment integration, Supabase Row Level Security, data integrity, and deploy safety. RaftLabs reviews the app manually and replies with ranked findings within 2 business days, no automated scan.
How it works
From URL to findings in 2 business days
- 012 MIN
Share your app
Send the live URL or a repo link, and tell us which AI builder you used. No login required on our end. - 022 BUSINESS DAYS
A senior engineer reviews it
Manual review, not an automated scanner. We check auth, payments, Supabase Row Level Security, data integrity, and deploy safety the way we would before taking any client's app live. - 03INBOX
You get the findings
A ranked list of what's solid and what's exposed, in plain language. Fix it yourself, hand it to your team, or come back to us.
What we check
AI builders optimize for a demo that looks finished. These are the six places that gap between looks-finished and is-finished shows up most.
Payments and webhooks
Whether Stripe (or your payment provider) is fully wired: webhooks handled, subscriptions and refunds working, not just a checkout button that looks right in a demo.
Supabase Row Level Security
The most common gap we see in Lovable and Bolt builds on Supabase: tables with RLS disabled or misconfigured, meaning any authenticated user can read or write data that isn't theirs.
Exposed keys and secrets
API keys and service credentials that ended up in client-side code or a public repo, where anyone can copy them out of your browser's network tab.
Data integrity
Whether the database has real constraints, foreign keys, and validation, or whether bad data can slip in because nothing at the schema level is stopping it.
Safe deploys
Whether you have error monitoring, a rollback plan, and health checks, or whether every deploy is a guess about what might break for users already on the app.
Useful next steps
More on MVP development
Work with us
Work with us
MVP Development Services
See the service
Article
Junk Removal Software Development: Build vs. Buy for Multi-Truck Operators
Jobber and Hauler Hero work fine at one or two trucks. At five trucks across multiple markets, the gaps in off-the-shelf tools start costing real money. Here is what multi-truck junk removal operators actually need from custom software and when building makes financial sense.
Read more
Article
Cost to Build a Home Services Marketplace Like TaskRabbit
A practical guide for regional and niche home services platforms evaluating a custom two-sided labor marketplace. Covers cost ($40K-$140K), V1/V2/V3 features, and where off-the-shelf tools like Sharetribe and Housecall Pro fail.
Read more
Article
Restaurant Reservation System Development: Cost, Build vs. Buy, and Where Projects Fail
Restaurant groups paying $6,000-$12,000 per location per year in OpenTable fees are commissioning their own reservation systems to own guest data and cut dependency. Here is what that build actually costs, who it is right for, and where these projects go wrong.
Read moreProof
Proof
TiAiMe: a sprawling AI life assistant, cut down to an MVP people could actually try
Read the case studyOnce you know what's exposed, we can take the parts that need rebuilding and turn them into production software.
Fixed cost, scoped after the review, not before.
What clients say
What founders say about taking AI-built apps live
Three-year average engagement. Founders and operators describing the work in their own words. No marketing varnish.
Testimonial 1 of 1: Gil Nugraha
Gil Nugraha
Founder at UrShipper
Indonesia
I definitely recommend RaftLabs, especially to solo founders like me. Their clear communication and detailed discussions have always helped me make better decisions.
Ready to see what's actually under the hood?
Send the URL. We check what's solid and what's exposed, rank it by risk, and send the findings. No sales call unless you ask for one.
- Free for any Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, or Emergent build. No credit card, no trial.
- A senior engineer reviews it manually. No automated scan.
- Ranked findings on auth, payments, Supabase security, and deploy safety within 2 business days.
- No sales call unless you ask for one.
Common questions
- Yes. No credit card, no trial, no hidden upsell. We offer it because we review a lot of Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, and Emergent builds already when scoping production work, and this lets founders see where they stand before committing to anything. If you want help fixing what we find, we're here. The findings are yours either way.
- Lovable, Replit, Bolt.new, v0, Emergent, Cursor, Base44, and anything else that generated your app, framework and backend don't matter. Most of what we check (auth, payments, data integrity, deploy safety) applies regardless of which tool built the frontend. If your backend is Supabase, we go deeper on Row Level Security specifically, since that's the gap we see most often.
- Because an automated scanner catches syntax patterns, not business logic. A real engineer reads your auth flow, checks whether your Supabase policies actually match your data model, and traces what happens when a webhook fails, the kind of thing a linter misses entirely. Two business days is what it takes to do that properly instead of generating a generic checklist.
- The live URL, or a repo link with read access if you'd rather share code than a running app. Tell us which AI builder you used and whether Supabase (or another backend) is involved. We work with whatever you're able to share.
- Within 2 business days, delivered to your inbox. This isn't an automated scan, a real engineer reviews your app and writes up what they find, which is why it takes a couple of days instead of a couple of seconds.
- A senior engineer from our product engineering team, the same people who scope and take AI-tool prototypes into production. They review your app the way they'd review one before shipping it for a client, which is why the findings go beyond what an automated scanner surfaces.
- No. The report is yours to act on however you want, forward it to your own developer, fix it yourself, or shop it to another agency. If you'd rather have us handle the rebuild, that's a separate, fixed-cost conversation, not something bundled into the free review.