Guest feedback is not a satisfaction metric. It is pricing power. Cornell University's Center for Hospitality Research found that a one-point gain in a hotel's online reputation score supports an 11.2% lift in average daily rate with no loss of occupancy (Cornell CHR, Anderson, 2012). What guests say, and how fast you act on it, moves the rate you can charge. That makes the collection and routing system one of the most commercially important tools a property runs.
That figure is the industry's, not ours. What we bring is the build: the trigger logic, the PMS integration, and the routing that make a feedback system work in live operations rather than in a demo.
- Post-stay review requests
- The default in most hotels. An email or SMS goes out after check-out asking for a review. Good for public reputation volume, but the feedback arrives after the guest has left, when the only lever left is damage limitation.
- Review-mining and reputation monitoring
- Reading and scoring what guests already posted on TripAdvisor, Google, and Booking.com. Useful for trend lines and competitor context, but every insight it surfaces is a complaint that already went public.
- In-stay feedback loops
- Event-triggered micro-surveys sent while the guest is still on property. The only channel that catches a problem when a duty manager can still fix it before it becomes a 1-star review. This is where the commercial value sits, and where most off-the-shelf tools are weakest.
Our delivery evidence
01
- active users within 2 months on the City Break Apartments guest experience platform (Ireland)
- 580+
02
- from kick-off to a live v1 with surveys running
- 8-10 wks
03
- rated by clients on Clutch
- 4.9/5
Feedback system features
What the system covers
- 01
In-stay micro-surveys
Short, event-triggered surveys sent via push notification, SMS, or email at key moments during the stay. First impression check-in survey, post-housekeeping survey, pre-departure survey. 2-3 questions maximum to keep response rates high. Issues flagged in real time so staff can intervene before check-out.
- 02
Real-time issue escalation
A negative in-stay response triggers an immediate alert to the relevant department head or duty manager. The alert includes the guest name, room number, concern, and the response they gave. Each step staff take is logged against the alert so the management team can see which issues were resolved and in what time.
- 03
Post-stay review routing
After check-out, the system sends a review request. Satisfied guests are directed to TripAdvisor, Google, or Booking.com. Guests below the satisfaction threshold go to a private feedback form. The routing threshold is configurable. Each touchpoint is tracked so you know open rate, click rate, and conversion to public review.
- 04
PMS-triggered automation
Survey sends are triggered by real guest events pulled from the PMS: check-in, housekeeping, and check-out, with no manual list management. Guest contact details, arrival date, and room data come from the PMS automatically. Surveys stop automatically if the guest checks out early.
- 05
Sentiment dashboard
Survey responses and review text classified by topic: cleanliness, staff, food, location, value. Scores over time by property, season, and guest segment. Patterns surface that individual reviews hide. Exportable for management reporting and benchmarking.
- 06
Review monitoring and response workflow
New TripAdvisor and Google reviews surfaced in a single dashboard via API. Response templates per review type, editable by the management team. Manager reviews and approves before posting. Full response history logged per review.
- 07
Multi-property aggregation
Group-level dashboard for hotel chains and management companies showing sentiment scores, review volume, and issue escalations across all properties. Drill down to individual property or compare properties side by side. Role-based access so property managers see their property and group managers see everything.
Manual review requests vs a PMS-triggered feedback system
| Manual review requests | PMS-triggered system |
|---|
| Timing | A weekly export or a batch blast at a fixed hour | Fires on the real event: 2 hours after check-in, the day after housekeeping, 24 hours before departure |
|---|
| List hygiene | Cancelled and early-departure guests get surveyed anyway | PMS state stops sends to cancelled reservations and early check-outs |
|---|
| Wrong-guest sends | Common, and each one earns a negative response for a stay that never happened | The guest, room, and dates come from the PMS record, so the right guest gets the right survey |
|---|
| Unhappy guests | Routed to a public review page like everyone else | Routed below a configurable threshold to a private form, so recovery happens before the review posts |
|---|
| Sentiment routing | A spreadsheet someone reads on Monday | A negative in-stay response alerts the duty manager in real time, with guest, room, and the concern attached |
|---|
| Response workflow | Reviews answered when someone remembers | New reviews surfaced in one dashboard with templates and response-time tracking against an internal SLA |
|---|
How we work
From scope to live feedback
- Week 1
01Feedback flow and PMS scope
We map your current review and complaint process, confirm the PMS integration method, and design the trigger schedule. Fixed price agreed before development starts.
- Weeks 2-3
02Survey and dashboard design
Survey questions, routing logic, escalation flows, and dashboard views wireframed and reviewed with your operations team. Email and SMS templates designed in your brand.
- Weeks 4-8
03Build and integrate
Bi-weekly delivery. PMS integration and trigger logic tested end-to-end: guest checks in, survey sends, response received, dashboard updated. Review routing logic tested with real addresses.
- Weeks 8-10
04Launch and team walkthrough
Production deployment of the v1. Dashboard walkthrough with operations and management teams. Eight weeks of post-launch support included, then the platform grows from there.
No feedback system is neutral. Route it badly and it suppresses honest reviews, annoys guests, or drowns managers in noise. These are the failure modes we design against from week one.
- Review gating is against platform policy
- Sending only happy guests to Google or TripAdvisor while diverting unhappy ones is review gating, and both platforms prohibit it in their own guidance. We build a genuine private feedback path for lower scores, not a filter that suppresses honest reviews. It intercepts complaints for recovery; it does not block anyone from posting.
- Survey fatigue kills response rates
- Fire too many surveys and response rates collapse. We cap frequency per guest, keep each survey to 2 to 3 questions, and tune the trigger schedule in the post-launch window using real response data rather than a guess.
- PMS data is often incomplete
- Missing emails, shared reservation contacts, and OTA-masked addresses are normal. We confirm the integration method and the data quality in discovery week, and fall back to on-property QR capture where contact data is thin.
- Sentiment models mislabel hospitality language
- Generic sentiment scoring misreads sarcasm and hotel-specific phrasing. Topic categories and thresholds are tuned to your property's language, and low-confidence responses route to a human rather than a wrong auto-category.
- Alert fatigue makes escalation useless
- If every response pings a manager, the alerts get ignored. Escalation fires only on genuinely negative in-stay responses, to the right department, with each step logged so the pattern is visible later.
Why us
Why hotel operators choose RaftLabs
01Catches problems before they go public
The purpose of in-stay feedback is to catch dissatisfied guests while you can still fix the problem. A post-stay review form is damage limitation. We build the trigger logic and escalation flow that makes in-stay feedback actually work in operations.
02PMS integration standard
Guest data comes from the PMS automatically, so survey timing aligns with actual stay events rather than a fixed schedule that reaches the wrong guest at the wrong time.
- Built with
- Mews · Opera · Apaleo · Cloudbeds
03Fixed price, defined scope
Scope and cost locked before development starts. Eight weeks of post-launch support included in the project cost.
Proof
What stands behind the build
01Hospitality portfolio, not a test build
City Break Apartments: 580+ active users on a guest experience platform we shipped, covering booking, check-in, and service management. Adjacent to feedback, on the same PMS-integrated operations we build guest surveys into. We understand how hospitality operations run and build software that fits into them.
02Event-driven PMS integration
Surveys trigger from real PMS events, not a daily export. The right guest gets the right survey at the right moment. We've integrated with Mews, Apaleo, Cloudbeds, and Opera.
03Fixed price before development starts
Scope and cost agreed in writing before development begins. No open-ended billing after handover.
048 weeks post-launch support included
Bug fixes, trigger adjustments, and dashboard refinements after real guest data starts coming in.
Where this is heading: review platforms are rewarding response, not just volume. Google Business Profile and TripAdvisor both state in their own guidance that responding to reviews supports ranking and traveller trust, and AI answer engines increasingly summarise a property's reputation from that same public review text. A system that catches issues in-stay, keeps public scores honest, and tracks response time against an SLA is what feeds those summaries well. The properties that win the next few years will be the ones acting on feedback during the stay, not reading about it a week later.