Asset Integrity Software for Oil & Gas

When equipment failure is predictable but the data to predict it is trapped in spreadsheets

Asset integrity failures in oil and gas have consequences that go well beyond the equipment itself. A corroded pipeline that fails unexpectedly causes production loss, environmental release, and potential injury. A pressure vessel with a known thickness measurement trend that was never compared to the previous reading causes a fitness-for-service failure that should have been caught two inspection cycles earlier. The data to prevent these failures usually exists, it just exists in formats that make trending, comparison, and prioritisation either manual or impossible. We build asset integrity platforms that centralise inspection records, automate risk-based scheduling, and surface anomaly trends before they become failures.

  • Asset register with full technical specification, documentation, and inspection history per equipment item

  • Risk-based inspection scheduling by asset criticality and condition rather than calendar intervals

  • Inspection result recording with corrosion measurement trending and anomaly flagging

  • Anomaly management workflow from identification to fitness-for-service assessment and close-out

Recent outcomes

Voice AI · Research

6× deeper insights

Text-based interviews converted to automated phone calls

AI Automation · Ops

20k+ txns day one

Manual invoice OCR across 40+ gas stations

Loyalty · Retail

1,062 users in 4 weeks

SuperValu & Centra loyalty platform with receipt validation

SaaS · Logistics

2,000+ shipments yr 1

Multi-carrier shipping hub for Indonesian eCommerce

4.9
on Clutch
See our work

The problem

Sound familiar?

  • Inspection records scattered across spreadsheets and paper files so when an anomaly is found on a vessel, there's no fast way to see the inspection history or compare it to the previous reading?

  • Inspection programme driven by calendar intervals rather than asset condition and criticality, so you're inspecting low-risk equipment on the same schedule as equipment where a failure would mean a production shutdown?

Short answer

RaftLabs builds custom asset integrity software for oil and gas operators. The platform covers a full asset register with technical documentation, risk-based inspection scheduling by asset criticality, inspection result recording with corrosion trending, anomaly and fitness-for-service management, preventive and corrective maintenance work orders, and integration with existing CMMS platforms like SAP PM and IBM Maximo. Most projects deliver in 12 to 16 weeks at a fixed cost.

Key takeaways

  • Risk-based inspection scheduling enforces regulatory minimum intervals (PHMSA, ASME, API) as a floor, only ever scheduling more frequent inspection, never less.
  • Thickness measurement trending calculates minimum remaining life from current corrosion rate, giving an auditable basis for interval adjustments.
  • Anomaly close-out requires a documented fitness-for-service assessment with method, assumptions, results, and the assessing engineer's qualification recorded.
  • A platform covering asset register, RBI scheduling, and inspection recording runs $50,000-$90,000; adding anomaly management and CMMS integration runs $80,000-$140,000.

Trusted by

Vodafone logo
Aldi logo
Nike logo
Microsoft logo
Heineken logo
Cisco logo
Calorgas logo
Energia Rewards logo

Asset integrity delivery, by the numbers

products shipped
100+
industries served
24+
cost delivery
Fixed
week delivery cycles
12-16

When equipment failure is predictable but the data to predict it is trapped in spreadsheets

We build asset integrity platforms that centralise inspection records, automate risk-based scheduling, and surface anomaly trends before they become failures, built around the specific equipment types, inspection methods, and regulatory frameworks of oil and gas.

Capabilities

What we build

  • 01
    Asset register and documentation

    Full equipment hierarchy with technical specification, design data, and documentation attached directly to each asset record.

  • 02
    Risk-based inspection scheduling

    Criticality- and condition-driven intervals enforcing regulatory minimums as a floor, with automatic schedule adjustment on inspection results.

  • 03
    Inspection result recording

    Corrosion trending with minimum-remaining-life calculation, and inspection findings classified by severity for triage.

  • 04
    Anomaly and fitness-for-service management

    Documented FFS assessments with assessor qualification recorded, risk-ranked open anomalies, and MOC linkage for resolutions.

  • 05
    Preventive and corrective maintenance

    PM schedules generating work orders automatically, with corrective work linked directly to the originating inspection finding.

    Built with
    SAP PM · IBM Maximo
  • 06
    Integrity reporting and compliance

    Programme compliance and corrosion fleet reporting, pipeline integrity management plan compliance, and regulatory submission exports.

How we work

From scope to live integrity platform

  1. Week 1
    01

    Asset base and CMMS scoping

    We map your asset base, current inspection programme, and CMMS setup. You leave week 1 with a written scope document and a fixed-price quote.

  2. Weeks 2-5
    02

    Risk model and integration design

    Criticality classification, inspection methods, and CMMS integration designed against your equipment types and regulatory framework.

  3. Weeks 6-14
    03

    Build and integrate

    Asset register, RBI scheduling, and anomaly management built in parallel, tested against real inspection data.

  4. Final 2-3 weeks
    04

    Launch and team training

    Integrity and inspection teams trained on the new workflow before full rollout.

Why us

Why oil and gas operators choose RaftLabs

  • 01
    Senior engineers build what they scope

    The engineers who assess your asset base also build the solution. No bait-and-switch, no offshore handoff after the contract is signed.

  • 02
    Fixed price before development starts

    We scope the work, calculate the cost, and lock it in writing before any development starts.

  • 03
    9 years and 100+ products shipped

    Clients include Vodafone, T-Mobile, Aldi, Nike, Cisco, and Lockheed Martin. Track record building industrial and field operations platforms.

  • 04
    Integrates with your CMMS, doesn't replace it

    SAP PM and Maximo remain the system of record for work execution.

  • 05
    Regulatory minimums enforced, never bypassed

    The risk model schedules more frequent inspection than the minimum, never less.

Have an asset integrity project?

Tell us your asset base, current inspection programme, and CMMS setup. We'll scope an integrity platform built around your equipment types and regulatory framework.

Talk about your asset integrity project

Related services

Asset Integrity and Maintenance Software for Oil & Gas, scoped in one call.

Tell us what's broken. Within one business day you get a straight take on cost, timeline, and the right first step. No deck, no pressure.

Stay on topic

More on manufacturing & energy

AI for Manufacturing Companies

AI for Manufacturing Companies

Read more
AI in warehouse management: what's actually working in 2026

AI in warehouse management: what's actually working in 2026

AI warehouse tools promise a lot. Most deliver on about half of it. Here's an honest look at what's working, what's still early, and how to pick the right place to start.

Read more
Mining Software Development

Mining Software Development

Custom mining software for mining operators, mine planning, equipment monitoring, safety compliance, geological data management, production reporting, and asset maintenance.

Read more

Frequently asked questions

Yes. We build the asset integrity capability as a layer that feeds data to the existing CMMS. Inspection work orders originate in the integrity platform and push to SAP PM or Maximo for execution; completion data flows back to update the inspection record.

Where a regulation sets a mandatory maximum inspection interval, as PHMSA Pipeline Safety Regulations and ASME/API codes do, the system enforces that interval as a floor below which the calculated interval cannot fall. The risk model can schedule more frequent inspection than the minimum but never less.

The platform is configurable for any inspection method: ultrasonic thickness measurement, magnetic particle inspection, dye penetrant testing, radiography, ACFM, intelligent pigging, visual inspection, and cathodic protection survey, across pressure vessels, pipelines, storage tanks, and rotating equipment.

A platform covering an asset register, risk-based inspection scheduling, inspection result recording, and a management dashboard typically runs $50,000 to $90,000. Adding anomaly management with fitness-for-service workflow and CMMS integration brings the total to $80,000 to $140,000.

Work with us

Tell us what you need. We'll tell you what it would take.

We scope Asset Integrity and Maintenance Software for Oil & Gas in 30 minutes. You walk away with a clear cost, timeline, and approach. No commitment required.

  • Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
  • Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
  • Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
  • 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
  • All conversations are NDA-protected.

Go deeper

Browse our case studies

Oil & gas software by area